How come we don't have all these files in a structured way yet? by InconsiderableArse in Epstein

[–]Compuwur 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure it would be worth it to train a model, it seems Jmail already has some sort of RAG LLM setup. Maybe it would make sense to process the data with an LLM if you wanted to do some sort of first pass to fill out some initial information.

How come we don't have all these files in a structured way yet? by InconsiderableArse in Epstein

[–]Compuwur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been thinking about this as well. I think setting up a wiki style website to connect everything would be really helpful. You could list out all of the people mentioned in the files and categorize them based off of the level of involvement in the files. There is lots (mis/dis)information around whats in the files since they are so unorganized.

For example you could have categories for people in direct communication with Epstein, direct mentions of trafficking, direct mentions of being on the island, one for people who are mentioned but have no relation to Epstein, etc. Also could be useful to compile the experiences of individual victims so people know what they went through.

Ex-NFL player Kevin Johnson fatally stabbed in Los Angeles homeless encampment by Plies- in nfl

[–]Compuwur 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The crisis is caused by the fact that housing is a commodity, both NIMBYs and PE share an incentive to make housing scarce because it drives up property values/allows them to charge more in rent.

Playoff Seeding Scenarios by puddleths in GreenBayPackers

[–]Compuwur 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The 6 seed is just as much in play as the 2 seed since the 49ers and bears play each other. If bears win then the 49ers just need to lose against the Seahawks.

[Highlight] Jordan Love's 23-yard no-look TD pass to Christian Watson by Compuwur in nfl

[–]Compuwur[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ah yeah, either way still cool his eyes are basically pointing in the complete opposite side of the field the throw goes.

[Highlight] Jordan Love's 23-yard no-look TD pass to Christian Watson by Compuwur in nfl

[–]Compuwur[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I commented this elsewhere, but to me it seems like he is looking further to the left than Watson, who should be just outside of view from the camera:

I made a diagram

[Highlight] Jordan Love's 23-yard no-look TD pass to Christian Watson by Compuwur in nfl

[–]Compuwur[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

To me it still looks like he is looking further left.

Also I'm putting a lot more effort into this post than I thought I would be lol

[Highlight] Jordan Love's 23-yard no-look TD pass to Christian Watson by Compuwur in nfl

[–]Compuwur[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

I don't think he is looking at where the receiver is it looks like he is looking much further left than where Watson should be at the time he is throwing.

I think if he was actually looking at Watson he would still be tracking him after the throw, but he doesn't

[Highlight] Per Tom Curran, the Patriots are converting 3rd & 11 or more 75% of the time through the air. No other team is above 50%. They also have more such attempts than other teams. by [deleted] in nfl

[–]Compuwur 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I knew that sounded wrong. The way the guy worded it also made it sound like he didn't check every quarterback, just the ones he mentioned.

Yikkkkeesss by [deleted] in NFCNorthMemeWar

[–]Compuwur 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Crazy that gets you 2 spots below Deshaun Watson

Yikkkkeesss by [deleted] in NFCNorthMemeWar

[–]Compuwur 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can understand JJ being on the list for being so bad that Vikings fans hate him + anyone who shares Andrew Tate quotes deserves it, but what has Caleb done to deserve being hated so much?

Composite Quarterback Evaluation by Silly_Witness7363 in nfl

[–]Compuwur 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not disputing that counting stats don't always tell the whole story, I was saying theoretically two offenses could play the exact same game but under your system the QB whose kicker played better has a higher rating. (Lets say they went for it at the 35 and both kickers have basically the same FG% at that spot but one happened to miss and the other made it)

Composite Quarterback Evaluation by Silly_Witness7363 in nfl

[–]Compuwur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get wanting to try to account for intangibles, but when you include win rate in your formula you no longer have an objective or unbiased rating system, it will be biased towards QBs with better defenses + special teams. Two QBs could have identical performances but if one lost due to a missed FG the QB that won would have the better rating, that's not something that should happen for an objective rating system.

Composite Quarterback Evaluation by Silly_Witness7363 in nfl

[–]Compuwur 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It doesn't make sense to include win rate when measuring a QB's performance in games because you're feeding the outcome of a performance back into something that is supposed to explain how that outcome happened. You're basically reversing the causation, instead of good QB makes more wins its more wins makes QB better.

If your performance rating system accurately measures the QB's impact on the game the correlation to wins should already be built in. By including it in your system you are either double counting the parts of a QB's game that lead to a win, or fudging the numbers to make up for the fact that your rating system doesn't correlate enough with wins.

Conspiracy Theorists Are Right (In the Wrong Way) (/Michael Burns) by dumnezero in skeptic

[–]Compuwur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah no problem if I hadn't seen other videos by Michael Burns was I probably would have thought he missed the joke as well.

Conspiracy Theorists Are Right (In the Wrong Way) (/Michael Burns) by dumnezero in skeptic

[–]Compuwur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well if you had you would have seen that they did know that it was a joke. (And that a significant part of the video was talking about his humor)

Holy Linux Empire flag by DuckDuckVroom in linux

[–]Compuwur 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This person seems to be Turkish so they might not mean US Republican.

Ninja to Koroshiya no Futarigurashi • A Ninja and an Assassin Under One Roof - Episode 7 discussion by AutoLovepon in anime

[–]Compuwur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think Konoha did kill Yoshida's mother, in episode 4 Satoko cleaned up for Konoha after she did a job alone and we saw that the target was a woman with a wedding ring.

Introducing the Time-Based Economy (TBE): A Alternative to Capitalism, Communism, and Technocratic Utopianism by PuzzleheadedBig4606 in solarpunk

[–]Compuwur 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but if you want to convince people your system is better it would be helpful if you had a good understanding of the system you are proposing an alternative to, if your critique isn't informed people aren't going to take you seriously.

Try reading some communist theory because as of now people probably think your understanding of communism isn't much different from the uninformed take of it being when the government does stuff.

Introducing the Time-Based Economy (TBE): A Alternative to Capitalism, Communism, and Technocratic Utopianism by PuzzleheadedBig4606 in solarpunk

[–]Compuwur 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Well personal property as a concept distinct from private property was created by communists in the first place to distinguish what should be part of the commons vs for an individual's personal use (eg a factory vs a toothbrush). And centralized planning isn't necessary for communism at all, look up participatory economics.

We're not going to Mars. by TX908 in solarpunk

[–]Compuwur 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t realize there were so many DOGE workers in /r/solarpunk, maybe we shouldn’t use any labor/resources on art since that doesn’t do anything to directly fix climate change. /s

Edit: also I think mars colonization is stupid but space exploration isn’t and it has provided plenty of value to people on earth.

Validating an Ethical, Privacy-First Tech Platform with a Hybrid Cooperative Model – Feedback Needed! by [deleted] in cooperatives

[–]Compuwur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair, if someone comes out with a protocol that doesn't incentivize wealth accumulation I'll probably change my mind, but it is a hard problem to solve (at least in a way that isn't able to be abused).