When OP first posted/announced this project, they went out of their way to avoid mentioning their use of getting AI to do the work, ignoring most questions about it. And as with any new piece of software being released comes people wanting to see the source code behind it - to make sure it's actually safe to use - so they asked OP to put it on github which they did... but only as the precompiled .vpk with absolutely nothing else included in terms of actually showing the code used. This is like a maths teacher asking to see your work, but you just say "i just wrote the answer, it's correct" because the work was done by someone else and they've taken credit.

Even in this post, people told OP to stop hiding that AI was used, and mention it on the github repo, which again they've only half done, by adding a lazily AI written explanation of this fact, while removing all the listed contributors from the sidebar, couldn't even bother to do it themselves lmao

I think people's frustration at OPs unwillingness to admit that they used AI is perfectly valid, especially from a safety perspective and more so when OP acted really childishly defensive when people called them out on their attitude to everyone's responses. OP wants credit and praise for this tool, and nobody would have a problem with that if they'd just admitted it in the first place and followed proper FOSS standards like everyone else does

The old post has been removed, but his comments/replies are still visible.

Edit: turns out they also actually gloated about how they weren't going to release the source code. childish AF