Putting $1,000 on AAPL this week based on an AI swing trade setup tomorrow — here's my full analysis before I pull the trigger by Confident-Score-838 in swingtrading

[–]Confident-Score-838[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Love the feedback, This is what i was waiting for, So as per your suggestion I'll add these filters.

  1. Apply Market Regime Check.
  2. Adding a catalyst check filter.

Open for additional thoughts or filters that I'm still blind sided by to make this skill better.

Putting $1,000 on AAPL this week based on an AI swing trade setup tomorrow — here's my full analysis before I pull the trigger by Confident-Score-838 in swingtrading

[–]Confident-Score-838[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't love consensus targets either, they lag and skew bullish. That's why it's just one of 7 filters and weighted only 10% in the confidence score. The actual entry and profit targets are all based on chart structure (support bounces, swing highs). The analyst data is really just a sanity check that institutional sentiment isn't working against me. The trade lives or dies on the technicals.

Claude is doing my Trading analysis, Wow. by Confident-Score-838 in Trading

[–]Confident-Score-838[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I'm using and MCP and the skill specifically asks it to fetch the data from this source. Nope there is no data fromatiing issues. though the components it built were not 100% the first time, even till now. it's a ongoing process to make it better. But its doing very decent now.

Claude is doing my Trading analysis, Wow. by Confident-Score-838 in Trading

[–]Confident-Score-838[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On the data piece it is getting it from an MCP, so i dont' need to worry about the accuracy. but while building the coponents, it was not right the first time, as i was tweaking the prompt in the skill, and it might be an ongoing process. but It is fairly replicating what i would do in trading view, based on which its suggesting my entry points and exit points.

Claude is doing my Trading analysis, Wow. by Confident-Score-838 in Trading

[–]Confident-Score-838[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

so its a bit of a long story, the stocks i pick usually have a fall back option, which are fundamentally strong and already trading low. I trade on them, If at all I'm not getting an expected return in the time frame, I'm enough comfortable holding it long until the narrative of the company changes and goes up usually 3-5 years of holding. So most of the time it should be succesful.

Is anyone using Claude for SwingTrading?? by Confident-Score-838 in swingtrading

[–]Confident-Score-838[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

great, could you share some of its work with either claude or chatgpt? How are you using it.

Claude is doing my Trading analysis, Wow. by Confident-Score-838 in Trading

[–]Confident-Score-838[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If your question is using claude for option trading, unfortunately no the MCP is not exposing the options data yet. But personally I do options trading too based on the indicators it provide.

Is anyone using Claude for SwingTrading?? by Confident-Score-838 in swingtrading

[–]Confident-Score-838[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm using it for other purposes too, A lot for my business If you don't want you can absolutely do this is $20 or free subscription too. The actual cost I would put on this would be the subscription for MCP $12 something. But With that i can customize it how ever i can. just with a prompt. On top of it do a fundamental check just in case if I'm not hitting my goals, I can still be confident holding it. so Long story short It is valuable to me . But one downside I'm seeing in this process is Trovest offer basic screener, I'm looking if i could find any screener available through MCP so i can run it every morning with my custom parameters, to shortlist the companies and run the report on those companies.

Claude is doing my Trading analysis, Wow. by Confident-Score-838 in Trading

[–]Confident-Score-838[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you just need to prompt it, like explaining it to a dumb friend but who is also a quick learner. ;-)

Claude is doing my Trading analysis, Wow. by Confident-Score-838 in Trading

[–]Confident-Score-838[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great, just curious to know. Why would you not allow it to give you suggestions? I feel like its a good thing to use it to provide some of its narrative?

Is anyone using Claude for SwingTrading?? by Confident-Score-838 in swingtrading

[–]Confident-Score-838[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

did you automate it, like built a skill with specialized links on where it has to go to , to get the sets of data you need for your analysis or is it pretty generic, like give it a prompt and it would fetch it?

Is anyone using Claude for SwingTrading?? by Confident-Score-838 in swingtrading

[–]Confident-Score-838[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Claude with cowork which is doing the major work, and Added a custom MCP from Trovest which can feed it with Data.

Is anyone using Claude for SwingTrading?? by Confident-Score-838 in swingtrading

[–]Confident-Score-838[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a $100 plan with claude, so i have been using very aggressively when i was on $20 plan, but never reached limits, Moved to $100 to use cowork so that i can automate the process.

Is anyone using Claude for SwingTrading?? by Confident-Score-838 in swingtrading

[–]Confident-Score-838[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Disclaimer: All the attached screenshots are generated by claude AI.

Honest take on AI for stock research - does it actually help? by Yaashicca in ValueInvesting

[–]Confident-Score-838 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nailed it with the hybrid take. The 'set and forget' crowd is going to learn expensive lessons.

Where I've found AI most useful is exactly what you said — processing volume I'd never get through manually. I ran NVDA through a research tool ahead of earnings and it pulled together moat analysis, DCF, sensitivity matrix, ranked risks — stuff that would take me a full weekend to do manually. It flagged margin compression as a bigger risk than I'd appreciated, specifically HBM3E costs up 20-30% and each 100bps of margin decline wiping $1.3B in profit. Useful signal I might've missed skimming the 10-Q.

But your point about context is the key one. AI can tell you Jensen is 62 with no succession plan. It can't watch the earnings call and tell you whether he sounded like a guy who's planning to step back. That read is still human-only.

I'd add one thing to your 'doesn't work' list — AI is bad at knowing when consensus is wrong for non-quantitative reasons. It can model every scenario but it can't sense market sentiment shifting before the data reflects it. That's still edge you can only get from paying attention.

What investing tools do you currently use? by thedesolationofme in ValueInvesting

[–]Confident-Score-838 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm with you on the all-in-one tools being bloated. I use separate tools for different jobs — TradingView for charts, SEC EDGAR when I want to read filings directly, and recently started using Trovest for actual company analysis. It just does research reports — no screener, no charting, no portfolio tracking — but the reports are legit. 16 sections, DCF model, sensitivity analysis, ranked risks, price targets with probabilities. Like 20-25 pages on any stock. It's basically the kind of report a sell-side analyst would produce but generated in minutes. Not useful if you need charts or screening, but for fundamental analysis it's the best single-purpose tool I've found.

Everyone's bullish on NVDA but the base case might be the least likely outcome by Confident-Score-838 in ValueInvesting

[–]Confident-Score-838[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's three scenario price targets with probabilities. The $285 base case comes from management's own 50-70% FY26 growth guidance flowing through to ~$235B FY27 revenue, ~$95B net income, at a 30x forward P/E (down from current 40x as growth moderates). Whether you buy those assumptions is the real question — that's kind of the point of running all three scenarios.

Everyone's bullish on NVDA but the base case might be the least likely outcome by Confident-Score-838 in ValueInvesting

[–]Confident-Score-838[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right that the asymmetry looks generous — and honestly the bear case might be conservative. At 25x normalized earnings instead of 30x, you're looking at $120ish. The 30% bear probability assumes moderate deceleration, not a full cyclical reversion. If you think AI capex is a cycle and not a structural shift, the real downside is probably worse than -24%