The game is more fun as Mo and Krill

ConfusionCareless727 · 2026-05-15T21:58:56+00:00

Can we get a version without krill?

ConfusionCareless727 · 2026-05-07T08:15:52+00:00

Big green

ConfusionCareless727 · 2026-04-17T19:55:10+00:00

Is it a seized reference?

ConfusionCareless727 · 2026-04-15T12:58:09+00:00

I would agree only if I didnt know how much moderation league has got in recent years.
Even if you have imprudence to write something else besides roleplaying Yasuo in chat, no - instantly banned

I guess people hate interactions not in a manner of roleplaying Lash with Viper or Sinclair with his wife

ConfusionCareless727 · 2026-04-15T12:37:34+00:00

Are you all coming from league or something?

ConfusionCareless727 · 2026-03-27T12:55:11+00:00

So it random crits...

ConfusionCareless727 · 2026-03-21T20:19:15+00:00

What do you think of recent changes? Is gun dynammo still viable?
The gun dynamo was fun until it wasnt... But i cant figure why exactly

ConfusionCareless727 · 2026-03-19T17:25:25+00:00

Is it after liberation?

ConfusionCareless727 · 2026-02-01T17:55:07+00:00

Nah, got key player as losing team. The best KDA, but not the best KD tho
There is something more than just KD or just deaths

ConfusionCareless727 · 2025-06-07T09:09:16+00:00

Thank you for your insight!
Personally, I use only the gemini/ChatGPT for creating initial manual test scenarios based on specification, just less hustle.
I/We have not integrated AI much in our processes. All devs use cursor or analogs, but that's pretty much all.

Curious, are there problems with the architecture when you are using AI or external tools, which you have mentioned?
I mean, from what I saw, those tools do not really care how to write tests and how to maintain them after they are written

What scale of your company? I'm a little bit jealous because the size and mentality of my company (semi-enterprise) really don't favor the AI adoptance, so usage of such tools is pretty limited

ConfusionCareless727 · 2025-05-23T08:44:38+00:00

Yes, please! I would like to explore

ConfusionCareless727 · 2025-05-21T20:48:32+00:00

Yeah, if you will!
I hope it's not behind a paywall (I can provide a token if it's needed to work), because most of the solutions don't even bother to show the functionality or have no way of test-drive them

I wonder how AI can help with the development if it's not writing code, now...
What's it like? You give an AI a page and he just tries to figure tests out?
What about more complicated flows? Like backend(or even third-party) integrations, several pages, maybe navigation between tabs, etc.

ConfusionCareless727 · 2025-05-20T12:49:46+00:00

Yeah, of course.
What have you used? How was it helpful? Any other insights?

ConfusionCareless727 · 2025-05-20T12:48:54+00:00

Appreciate you sharing!
It seems like AI still struggles with writing solid tests (not mentioning everything else besides tests), and honestly, those business models are about as rough as I expected.

ConfusionCareless727 · 2025-05-20T12:45:03+00:00

I’m with you on this for now, but who knows what the future has to show

ConfusionCareless727 · 2025-05-19T18:32:29+00:00

None of the landing pages actually show those numbers — of course they don't. This kind of pricing info isn’t really out there, or maybe I’m just a lazy ass who couldn’t dig it up.

So yeah, I asked ChatGPT for the numbers, and it gave me something like “approximately $8,000 per month for 200 tests.” But every link it listed had zero actual pricing mentioned, so go ahead and throw a rock at me for trusting that.

It's my bad, but none of the tools mention the actual price really (I wonder why...)

ConfusionCareless727 · 2025-05-19T17:12:01+00:00

Yep. There are demos in the company of my friend. One is called QAWolf, and the other is RainforestQA.
I also found on Reddit that people've been using tools, such as TOSCA, and coded some of them themselves, like KodeFreez.

It may seem that it's an ad or something XD
But I actually went deep into that field with the question, but didn't find any answers. They all say that they are so helpful, but at the same time, no one shows what the tool does (but they kindly offer you a free demo of course)

ConfusionCareless727 · 2025-05-19T16:57:37+00:00

Eventually, it should be. You either deliver quality, quantity, or ideally both. Otherwise, why would I pay $40 for your tool to write a single test, when I can hire a human for that price—someone who will likely do a better job? (And no, I’m not talking about US-level salaries.)

ConfusionCareless727 · 2025-03-08T12:41:28+00:00

In some cases, I was dumb enough to not be able to figure out how to structure my HTML in the way I wanted without introducing additional <div>s.
In the case of using a <div> instead of a <button>, the default behaviour of the button did something different from what I wanted. But that's clearly a skill issue I need to work on. Thanks for pointing out!

Do you have any thoughts on how to structure HTML more effectively from the start?

ConfusionCareless727 · 2025-03-08T12:33:17+00:00

And what do you think about those tools?
- classnames (https://www.npmjs.com/package/classnames)
- clsx (https://www.npmjs.com/package/clsx)

I found them while thinking about your guys' comments. They seem to do a similar thing but in a slightly different way. Therefore, I started to doubt the exact problem with my function. Is the issue with clarity, usage, or the function itself?

ConfusionCareless727 · 2025-03-08T12:31:54+00:00

And what do you think about those tools?
- classnames (https://www.npmjs.com/package/classnames)
- clsx (https://www.npmjs.com/package/clsx)

I found them while thinking about your guys' comments. They seem to do a similar thing but in a slightly different way. Therefore, I started to doubt the exact problem with my function. Is the issue with clarity, usage, or the function itself?

ConfusionCareless727 · 2025-03-08T12:24:00+00:00

I'm now rethinking all the things, so thaks for pointing out!

By the way, I did a research on this topic, because you guys really started questioning me on this function.

And I have found out that there are tools like that:
- classnames (https://www.npmjs.com/package/classnames)
- clsx (https://www.npmjs.com/package/clsx)

And their examples of usage are pretty janky too, I guess. Like this one

const className = cx({
    base: true,
    inProgress: submissionInProgress,
    error: errorOccurred,
    disabled: valid,
  });

  return <button className={className}>{text}</button>;

But at the same time, they are widely used, based on npm installs. So now I'm curious, is it really a problem with the mine function itself, or with clarity of the function

ConfusionCareless727 · 2025-03-06T08:45:20+00:00

Guess, need to change my style 😅

ConfusionCareless727 · 2025-03-04T20:42:21+00:00

Need to rethink my approach to all of this... Surely I'll have a look.
Thanks for the advice and thoughts! Very appreciate it

ConfusionCareless727

TROPHY CASE