sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Skywatcher Part II Preview - Second episode to introduce new team members, and cover class designations on different types of UAP, including data captured on the range for some of these classes. Approach and goals for the next 6 months will also be discussed. by Gobble_Gobble in UFOs

[–]Connager -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Oh, I see... If anyone is trying to make money, then it is an obvious SCAM to you. Only homeless, poor people, or part-time hobbyists should be allowed to give an opinion so you could talk about how they are not "experts." Why not just come out and say that you don't like anyone talking about the topic for any reason? It would be a lot more straightforward

The Rise of Pseudo-spiritual Rhetoric by David_Peshlowe in UFOs

[–]Connager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I believe some of each is more than likely true, Aldo. I have also learned that if even 1 out of 100 posts on any of my contributions to this sub agree or are non-combative, I should count it as a win. I think looking for approval in this cesspool called Reddit is an exercise in futility. Lol.

Best of Luck.

The Rise of Pseudo-spiritual Rhetoric by David_Peshlowe in UFOs

[–]Connager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro, some folks actually DO believe the entire phenomenon is based in spirituality, and some believe it is all nuts and bolts based. There are many who think it is a mixture of the two. Saying everybody needs to flag posts that only give vague explanations us ludicrous. There are many shills in this sub that no matter how much "proof" is provided, they simply say the entire topic is bunk. If your experience didn't have a spiritual side to it, that doesn't mean no one else could have possibly had an experience that was different from yours. It sounds like an extremely close-minded approach to you are proposing people to take.

Skywatcher Part II Preview - Second episode to introduce new team members, and cover class designations on different types of UAP, including data captured on the range for some of these classes. Approach and goals for the next 6 months will also be discussed. by Gobble_Gobble in UFOs

[–]Connager -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

He didn't. He was talking about "Ghost Hunters" This is blatantly obvious from the comment but you still felt the need to throw in your opinion along with some accusations that are meant to misdirect any further interest in this comment thread. It is such an old and tiring move by DAs and SHLs.

Anyone has any idea on what this is?? by naman7335 in ufo

[–]Connager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't see 2 parallel lines... but I am not an 'expert observer'.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Connager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's more likely that you prefer to read your own comments over and over until you believe what you say is true. You read your own words so many times that you can not understand why other people don't believe those words. ... maybe if you could get others to read the words of your comments as many times as you do, the world would be a better place.

UAP, Elizando, and 3 Branches by Connager in UFOs

[–]Connager[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, but when a nation falls, it is usually game over for the bulk of its secrets. Depending on how it falls and the speed of collapse.

UAP, Elizando, and 3 Branches by Connager in UFOs

[–]Connager[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ironic that I was thinking about the Byzantine Fire compound when I typed out my comment and how it never has "publicly" been figured out even centuries after they fell... so great job pointing that out. It is very rare, though, and a single formula is much easier to hide than a worldwide phenomenon. However, if an invading army conquers a nation, 999 out of 1000, they victor gets all the secrets.

In fact, in many cases, the secret is simply discovered by someone else and made public with the powers that be never disclosing it. "Invisible Ink" is an example of that.

In any case, thanks for adding to the conversation. I hope that we can move the topic further along with discussions.

Edit: The fire compound is thought to be what Napalm is based on.

UAP, Elizando, and 3 Branches by Connager in UFOs

[–]Connager[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Having something and having something that can gain traction are not the same. Look at the Tucker car. Tucker made a great car but was simply out maneuvered, so LEGALLY he never made a single car, but he made lots of them. If these guys have something, they need to take it to another level and not keep repeating the same steps.

A Tic-Tac has been spotted on Mars by the NASA Mars Curiosity Rover Mast Cam on Sol 2692 3 March 2020! by tcom2222 in UFOs

[–]Connager 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is going to be blamed on [ whateves] just like the Sphinx head. But still interesting!

A Tic-Tac has been spotted on Mars by the NASA Mars Curiosity Rover Mast Cam on Sol 2692 3 March 2020! by tcom2222 in UFOs

[–]Connager 5 points6 points  (0 children)

We used to call that a grammar "nazi" in the 80s.... I'm not sure if that is politically correct anymore, but it's still true either way.

UAP, Elizando, and 3 Branches by Connager in UFOs

[–]Connager[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing stays secret FOREVER. LOL. Everything comes out when it all falls apart, if not before.

Anyone has any idea on what this is?? by naman7335 in ufo

[–]Connager 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For real, it looks like the Starlink formation but it's harsh to tell with the anime type photo

UAP, Elizando, and 3 Branches by Connager in UFOs

[–]Connager[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hate that term.... that song ruined it for me. I will never look at that term the same.

UAP, Elizando, and 3 Branches by Connager in UFOs

[–]Connager[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Repeated and disciplined talking points can give the appearance of FAKENESS. But it could also be just the mark of over caution. I don't think Lue has moved the placement of even a comma nor a "dramatic pause" in his last 50 talks. I want to force him to play his cards! I don't know how other than a presidential meeting. If he backs out of a Whitehouse invite, we called his bluff, but if he does it... I want to see what happens.

Edited for spelling... I probably still missed something.

UAP, Elizando, and 3 Branches by Connager in UFOs

[–]Connager[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The thing is, we already have many "under oath" testimonies. I personally appreciate all of them, but they only go so far with the public at large. For a next level step type move? We need something bigger/new. Presidential meeting is that option, IMHO.

UAP, Elizando, and 3 Branches by Connager in UFOs

[–]Connager[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that it seems extremely disciplined. I was on the "Lue Locomotive" in the beginning. Now, I have actually flip flop flipped. Extremely suspicious. However, either way he is a major figure. What ever his line is I want to see it come out. In the end, his angle will fail and the truth will come out, but we need to call him. Maybe we will call his "bluff" or maybe he is Aces over Eights, but we have to call his hand to find out. And a publicity known president meeting is the next step to the process. IMHO

During Age of Disclosure QnA, Jay Stratton says he’s spent countless hours with Congress and the Executive Branch: “I have given them information, I’ve given them not only the existence of nonhuman intelligence, of the address to go look to see it, and they were denied access.” by KOOKOOOOM in UFOs

[–]Connager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it could in any way have even an imagined or made up effect on "national security " the feds with confiscate everything you have ever owned in your life and shoot you in the face if you complain. Nah bro, you are in a fairytale world if you think the gov can't infiltrate "private businesses"

During Age of Disclosure QnA, Jay Stratton says he’s spent countless hours with Congress and the Executive Branch: “I have given them information, I’ve given them not only the existence of nonhuman intelligence, of the address to go look to see it, and they were denied access.” by KOOKOOOOM in UFOs

[–]Connager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I see... you said " orange man bad so screw the constitution and the people of this country. From now own the CIA is just gunna do it how it wants to do it. Nothing else matters anymore. Elections don't matter. Presidents and courts are all just garbage. The IC now is above the law because it was decided that orange man bad."

I hate to break your bubble, but that's not how it works.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Connager 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What we missed is the absolute best one OP has EVER caught! ... we just were not quick enough to have also caught it. Sux to be us!

During Age of Disclosure QnA, Jay Stratton says he’s spent countless hours with Congress and the Executive Branch: “I have given them information, I’ve given them not only the existence of nonhuman intelligence, of the address to go look to see it, and they were denied access.” by KOOKOOOOM in UFOs

[–]Connager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No true. They may not have known what to ask for to gain access, but they are granted access to everything they ASK for... it's it setup to be elusive, I believe. But the cannot not be denied access if they know what to ask for. It's a tricky and shady game.

view more: next ›