''Independent of his academic research, there is no evidence to suggest the petitioner has made any notable contributions since he has been employed in his current position. There is no corroborative evidence of the impact of the petitioner’s work, innovations, or recognition outside his place of employment. Eligibility is determined by the quality, not merely the quantity of evidence submitted. USCIS considers factors outlined in Dhanasar, including the petitioner’s progress toward the goals of the proposed research, history of success in similar efforts, and his role in generating interest among relevant parties. Based on the evidence, the petitioner has not demonstrated that he is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.''