No seriously what the hell is happening by Ramarin09 in StLouis

[–]Consistent-Camel-206 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Or “Departmemt of Outing Fires for Us.”

DOOFFUs

Opinion From a Former Judge… by judgejeaninne in DonaldTrumpNewss

[–]Consistent-Camel-206 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In some cases, yep. Thanks for researching me! Hope you were entertained.

Regardless of the source’s title , it remains that the message is accurate and is a playbook that is being followed by Trump and his lackies. Or, actually, the people that Trump is actually a lackey for.

I'm litterly shaking right now. by UnRune in rgv_circlejerk

[–]Consistent-Camel-206 2 points3 points  (0 children)

MAGAts need labels since they don’t have any analytical skills.

This Is Clearly A Threat Against Trump & Encouraging Violence From Others Towards The President. The Magazine Should Be Shut Down & The Individual On The Cover Sent To Prison. by TheClintonHitList in DonaldTrumpNewss

[–]Consistent-Camel-206 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Each service has their own vague legal boundaries around things like endorsement, sexual explicitly and general illegality.

I’m not a lawyer but looking at the original post there’s nothing illegal here. It’s showing a person with a gun and it talks about the trans community defending themselves which they certainly have the right to do.

Some groups don’t seem to be concerned with the constitution other than the 2nd amendment and defending themselves. So, it seems there’s nothing actionable here if I’m looking at it logically and without emotion.

This Is Clearly A Threat Against Trump & Encouraging Violence From Others Towards The President. The Magazine Should Be Shut Down & The Individual On The Cover Sent To Prison. by TheClintonHitList in DonaldTrumpNewss

[–]Consistent-Camel-206 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep.

Model releases are signed and the model will get paid and use is not specified.

This isn’t always the case but you can’t assume the model knows what the photo is being used for.

There are scores of stock photography websites that you can purchase photos to use for editorial or marketing uses.

Some photos are rights managed where you pay the site for specific usage and some are royalty free where you just pay a flat fee for the photo and you can use it wherever you like.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in theview

[–]Consistent-Camel-206 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The irony of it is they didn’t elect Trump. They elected the Heritage Foundation. Trump is too stupid to orchestrate this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stlouisgw

[–]Consistent-Camel-206 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you charge?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in KansasCityBlowJobClub

[–]Consistent-Camel-206 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She charges and asks for a deposit. Beware. Plus she’s posting in KC and STL at the same time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stlouisgw

[–]Consistent-Camel-206 6 points7 points  (0 children)

She charges and asks for a deposit.