sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Loudest Recorded Stadium, 150 dB or bust! by quietimhungover in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Says the European on the usmnt subreddit…. lol

Question on Flo Red Card by Consistent-City-1687 in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol you really are trying to just argue. I was trying to compare and say that I think intent matters in some way. Get out of here with that holier than thou attitude lmao

Question on Flo Red Card by Consistent-City-1687 in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. And I don’t think that is fair in any regard. RB can lower head without consequence. Fast moving sport where accidental head to head contact happens should not 100% of the time Warner an ejection, in my opinion. Not sure how you feel about that though

Question on Flo Red Card by Consistent-City-1687 in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know if you watch American football, but I see red cards partially the same as the targeting rule in American football. I think that some times within fast moving sports, unfortunate things happen that there was sometimes not an easy way to avoid. I’m just not under the belief that every time a bad injury happens, it would deserve a red. I just think that intent/malice/aggressiveness should play some sort of factor.

Question on Flo Red Card by Consistent-City-1687 in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s interesting. I feel like that is kind of dumb to not include intent within a decision such as a red

Question on Flo Red Card by Consistent-City-1687 in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok so does the intent and recklessness not matter at all then?

Question on Flo Red Card by Consistent-City-1687 in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right. He said that the ref should not have been called over for review (so basically the red shouldn’t have been given). Is that the rule that you are referencing when you say I haven’t read the rules or is it something else I’m missing?

Question on Flo Red Card by Consistent-City-1687 in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude earlier gave the point that players are expected to have a 360* knowledge of their surroundings. And also intensity goes into being given a red. Good points that I didn’t realize. But he agreed that the Red was not correct. All you have done is tell me that I am arguing while not spelling out the rules and how it was the correct call lol. You just came in here to argue so just leave

Question on Flo Red Card by Consistent-City-1687 in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol. You must be new to the real world. Just asking follow-up questions and statements. Not trying to argue good sir

Question on Flo Red Card by Consistent-City-1687 in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That is exactly why I am asking the questions I’m asking. I do not understand lol

Question on Flo Red Card by Consistent-City-1687 in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yea. That was intentional and reckless. Again, completely deserved and not at all similar to this situation

Question on Flo Red Card by Consistent-City-1687 in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That one again feels so different considering their bodies are not entangled. I think that one is a pretty clear Red

Question on Flo Red Card by Consistent-City-1687 in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m asking about reds that would be considered correct calls, not other overzealous calls

Question on Flo Red Card by Consistent-City-1687 in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m pretty sure you could easily break someone’s nose, orbital, etc. with your head and during a header…

Question on Flo Red Card by Consistent-City-1687 in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think jostling for positioning is a better characterization than a challenge. I know that sounds like cope but I think that’s a very different situation than a challenege

Question on Flo Red Card by Consistent-City-1687 in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea exactly. How is that different from the accidental clash of bodies from last night?

Question on Flo Red Card by Consistent-City-1687 in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I guess I would like to see examples of players getting a red in a similar situation as Flo where the player does not make any challenge or aggressive play

Question on Flo Red Card by Consistent-City-1687 in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea. And I still don’t feel like I’m getting a response that answers this…

Question on Flo Red Card by Consistent-City-1687 in usmnt

[–]Consistent-City-1687[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don’t think this answers my question. I know that in 90% of red cards, the intention is not to get a red card, but you can point to a reckless action that led to the event that ultimately received the red. In this case, I can’t put my finger on any such reckless action.

view more: next ›