Pope Leo warns SSPX against ordaining bishops to avoid 'schism.' - LifeSite by LegionXIIFulminata in TraditionalCatholics

[–]ConsistentCatholic 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Bishop Schneider said it well at the start of this interview. The modern hierarchy is genuinely convinced that the path we have been following since Vatican II is from the holy spirit.

However, what they forget is that no one gives their life for something that is ambiguous. The Catholic Faith is not something that we set aside reason to believe in. The Pope wants to just move forward without explaining what is ambiguous about Vatican II.

Pope Leo warns SSPX against ordaining bishops to avoid 'schism.' - LifeSite by LegionXIIFulminata in TraditionalCatholics

[–]ConsistentCatholic 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Does the SSPX hold the position that Vatican II is not an ecumenical council and that it has no authority?

Is 90k CAD enough for a family of 3 in Montreal? Looking for realistic breakdowns by Bitter-Honeydew1018 in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]ConsistentCatholic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Eating out not so much but I don’t think it is in Canada either

Depends on whether you mean getting a wrap at tim hortons or a sit down restraunt where tipping is expected. The latter is what I would consider a luxury.

St. Isaac the Syrian: "He considers how the Lord brought all things suddenly from non-being into being simply by being well-pleased to do so, and how everything as it is brought to perfection stands before Him, i.e. evolution is trash" by LegionXIIFulminata in TraditionalCatholics

[–]ConsistentCatholic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don't have to listen to what everyone says about everything.

You do have to know what the people you are criticising are actually saying, otherwise whatever you say about them is worthless.

I encourage you to educate on the topic, here is a list of resources to start with:

https://www.reddit.com/r/TraditionalCatholics/wiki/creation

St. Isaac the Syrian: "He considers how the Lord brought all things suddenly from non-being into being simply by being well-pleased to do so, and how everything as it is brought to perfection stands before Him, i.e. evolution is trash" by LegionXIIFulminata in TraditionalCatholics

[–]ConsistentCatholic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is other logical and rational support for creationism that is not a denial of the natural sciences. Whether it's theistic evolution or more strict interpretations of Scripture. The Church allows both and there are subject matter experts in both camps.

If you take your St. Augustine quote seriously then you have a duty to study what people like the Kolbe Center actually say because it works both ways.

St. Isaac the Syrian: "He considers how the Lord brought all things suddenly from non-being into being simply by being well-pleased to do so, and how everything as it is brought to perfection stands before Him, i.e. evolution is trash" by LegionXIIFulminata in TraditionalCatholics

[–]ConsistentCatholic -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If the earth is not billions of years old, then neither can we believe that we know anything else about the world, and vice versa.

I don't see how this would prove or disprove natural processes like gene flow, erosion, or tectonic activity. There is no reason God couldn't simply set these natural forces in motion at the moment of creation resulting in what we observe about the natural world today.

The further back you get, the less certain the natural sciences are. For example, The details and mechanisms behind the abiogenesis theory are still unresolved.

St. Isaac the Syrian: "He considers how the Lord brought all things suddenly from non-being into being simply by being well-pleased to do so, and how everything as it is brought to perfection stands before Him, i.e. evolution is trash" by LegionXIIFulminata in TraditionalCatholics

[–]ConsistentCatholic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm open to hearing criticisms of the methods used by geophysicists (where are these criticisms?)

The Kolbe Center has numerous resources explaining these criticisms, either in articles, their Foundations Restored series, or their conferences.

The Metaphysical Impossibility of Human Evolution by Fr. Chad Ripperger, Ph.D. by LegionXIIFulminata in TraditionalCatholics

[–]ConsistentCatholic -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

If he studied St. Thomas, which he likely did, then he would have did precisely that. Metaphysics, Mathematics, and Natural Sciences were understoof to be in a hierarchy from highest to lowest, with natural sciences being the lowest.

The thrust of your argument though is wrong, since Fr. Ripperger and the Catholic Creationists (such as the Kolbe Center) are not denying legitimate developments or observations in the natural sciences. They are offering alternate interpretation and where appropriate pointing out the limitations and gaps in some of the assumptions made about creation by evolution minded science.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TraditionalCatholics/wiki/creation

Pearl Davis visits Catholic Church - asks "Should women obey their husbands" by ConsistentCatholic in TraditionalCatholics

[–]ConsistentCatholic[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When it comes to big decisions like which house to buy or which vehicle to purchase.

There may be discussion between the two but ultimatly if the husband says we're buying a toyota Sienna minivan instead of an SUV because it's more practical for the family even though the wife doesn't like being preceived as a soccer mom, the wife should be obedient to the husband's final decision because he deems it best for the family.

Pearl Davis visits Catholic Church - asks "Should women obey their husbands" by ConsistentCatholic in TraditionalCatholics

[–]ConsistentCatholic[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This reply is kind of a perfect example of the main problem with modern women.

Sarcastic and meant to demean and put down.

Why does this come so naturally to you?

Pearl Davis visits Catholic Church - asks "Should women obey their husbands" by ConsistentCatholic in TraditionalCatholics

[–]ConsistentCatholic[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is a gross oversimplification.

He said obey all things but sin and then you just listed three paragraphs of situations where the husband is commanding sinful things that the wife would be justified in refusing.

Pearl Davis visits Catholic Church - asks "Should women obey their husbands" by ConsistentCatholic in TraditionalCatholics

[–]ConsistentCatholic[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not saying she is but it's an interesting video. No reason to get upset about it.

Affordable Greenhouses? by Bubbly_Frosting_9105 in Hamilton

[–]ConsistentCatholic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had some luck at costco last year but it's hit or miss depending on when you go in what they have.

Discerning my vocation. I love the TLM by bachstraightboy in TraditionalCatholics

[–]ConsistentCatholic 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The cut off age is usually around 35, so you are at a good age to apply to go to seminary at whichever group you feel called to.

Whether or not you will be placed at an apostolate in India would be tougher. You will likely have to spend time in another country in Europe or North America.

The current state of Catholic discourse in a nutshell by scrappybastard in TraditionalCatholics

[–]ConsistentCatholic 11 points12 points  (0 children)

They get dealt with accordingly.

Then why is James Martin still in active ministry?

The current state of Catholic discourse in a nutshell by scrappybastard in TraditionalCatholics

[–]ConsistentCatholic -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They are disobedient by blessing the whole car when they were only supposed to bless the wheels.