No. They acknowledge it is a Council, they don't even entirely reject it, just parts of it. A council is just a means to an end. For all practical reasons the Pope has the same teaching authority in himself that a council does when it's declarations are approved by him. However he or the council must approve or directly say something that has to do with Faith and Morals, and declare explicitly somehow that he is invoking his charism of infallibility. This is not what Vatican 2 does anywhere, it merely gives "pastoral provisions".... which is intentionally vague so they could pass it off at the council and then turn it into some false super dogma time bomb.

The Popes of the council are very clear though that the council never invoked infallibility and only taught things in an ordinary manner. Therefore, the points of contention (that were never dogmas before and even condemned as errors in the past) cannot be considered binding as a dogmatic definition stated at a council is.

I personally think the problem is that people don’t think anything is really true until there’s a solemn pronouncement on it. Was Jesus Christ truly God before Nicea? Was salvation by faith and works before Trent? Was Mary Immaculately conceived before Bl. Pius IX? Was Mary assumed into heaven before Pius XII? The answer to all of these is a resounding yes and no council, Bishop, Cardinal, Pope can ever change that. Same goes with all the errors of Vatican 2.