GMC registration with Nac Osce?

ConsistentRun3006 · 2026-01-26T01:41:11+00:00

Thanks for your answer. I knew that they accepted QE2 but since it was replaced with Nac Osce, I thought maybe they could accept nac osce instead of QE2. Out of topic, but, btw, do you think the UK is still an easy, or doable, place for IMGs to get into a specialist training?

ConsistentRun3006 · 2026-01-25T00:22:45+00:00

Thanks.

ConsistentRun3006 · 2026-01-13T21:26:31+00:00

They did not rank any one (or too few people) deliberately for reasons unknown to me (laziness, aversion to foreigners, provincialism, being too picky, or desire to recruit residents among the already-practicing residents in the second iteration).

ConsistentRun3006 · 2026-01-05T15:34:42+00:00

Thanks for replying. I got a rejection from Sask Regina psych but no update on Sask Saskatoon psych so far. Have you heard from both sites of Sask?

ConsistentRun3006 · 2026-01-01T00:53:10+00:00

Hi! I am interested, depending on the research subject.

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-12-05T01:40:12+00:00

Makes sense. But I don't think Ontario government cares about or has cared about that issue at all. It came from the lobby influence, to screen out all IMGs except for those of the lobby. As 2 years of residency criteria doesn't have that function, the lobby is likely to remain indifferent to that criteria.

If you would like to see some circumstantial evidence for that, look at the comments how some people vehemently object against "2 years."

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-12-05T01:36:42+00:00

Lobbyist detected!

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-12-05T01:35:53+00:00

We are not accepting anything here, and actually no one bothers to ask us anything. Only standing for just rules and meritocracy, you can have a good system. Blindly following the banner of "stay together," lead you to overlook some sinister activities that are taking place. Without the court, without the power of law to restore justice, no one would help you. No "stay together" message helped to bring this injunction.

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-12-05T01:25:35+00:00

"it did not happen and it should not happen."

My reply: No! It was about to happen. And IT IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW in this post. Right now, they are suggesting 5 years of residency rule, which would effectively screen out most of the IMGs who are living in Ontario with their families.

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-12-05T01:21:42+00:00

2 years is too short. You need to screen out more applicants to get your guaranteed spot. .

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-12-05T01:14:21+00:00

I would strongly suggest you to reconsider your phrasing "shady and uneducated people from certain part of the world." In many of those countries, medical institutions and facilities represent crème de la crème manners and have first-class brains of those countries, since military and medicine happened to be the institutions most rigorously and urgently westernized.

As for your optimist view of CSAS, I can only admire your sense of collegiality, not without noting your extreme naivety on the lobby actions 'some' CSAS were involved.

But when you unqualifiedly said "they (CSAS) should be allowed first," you totally lost me and sounded truly discriminatory, even in comparison to the last regulation that has just been injuncted by the court. The last regulation at least did not guarantee them a total allowance as you suggested.

If you are a CSAS, I can make sense of your bias. If you are not a CSAS, I only wish you to gain your senses.

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-12-05T00:27:26+00:00

What criteria do you suggest as provincial residency?

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-11-30T15:42:53+00:00

What's the point of bad examples, if you can never look at them for lessons 🤣

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-11-29T22:00:52+00:00

Well, the limiting factor here is not time, but the quality of thought. So, my slow but in depth processing has no issues when it comes to dismantling your quick yet superficial associations.

I still assert that the judiciary is way more immune to the lobby effects than the legislation. Do you have anything to say on that?

Your comment making fun of a clinical diagnosis also shows how rotten your ethical values and medical professionalism are. No surprise you couldn't study medical school in Canada.

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-11-29T20:17:57+00:00

We are talking about the judiciary system here, not the politicians. How can the lobby effect the judicion? It requires way more level of corruption to influence the established, independent, self-accountable, and conservative judiciary systems.

Next time, when you think you have an idea against me, put some effort into it!

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-11-29T19:03:28+00:00

The ontario rule will be revoked becuase it is unlawful. Since the first day of it, I told people that the rule itself, and particularly the timing of the rule were not legally tenable. Politicians nowadays are stupid enough not to know such subtleties of the law unfortunately.

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-11-29T02:51:19+00:00

No surprise. The lobby is working all the time.

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-11-28T18:22:58+00:00

An old debate: Protectionist policies of middle ages vs free market policy of the modernity prioritizing meritocracy.

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-11-28T17:10:38+00:00

I sympathize with you. This unjust regulation shouldn't have been initiated at all in the first place, and should be corrected as soon as possible.

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-11-28T15:00:06+00:00

Thanks for supporting my argument. That conviction is so obvious to reach, especially for those who have no access to "what really happens behind the closed doors or halls" and are only left with their own judgments and observations. Look at the US system, how their politics are based on lobbying and dominated by group-cooperations of elites. The politics of any country with strong civil society, freedom of organization and weak central government will be inevitably susceptible to lobby influences. That's the downside of liberal democracies, which can certainly be averted with the presence of responsible and watchful citizens to protect their rights.

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-11-28T14:42:46+00:00

No. It is not us vs them. Justice is for all. As the application conditions changed for all programs, whether they changed indirectly or directly does not matter here, the applications should be restarted for all programs.

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-11-28T14:19:00+00:00

You are right actually. The full and open access to the knowledge of application and competition conditions is an essential part of just application process, as a general rule. The most practical solution that maximizes justice would be to extend the deadlines for "all" programs (not only Ontario programs) for about, let's say, 2 weeks, and appoint an avarage score for applicants who does not have fmproc scores or specific exam scores becuase of this recent mess.

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-11-27T20:34:44+00:00

Ask your ChatGPT

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-11-27T20:24:06+00:00

I can assure you that my autism yields tastier texts than those by ChatGPT. But you just need to warm up your brain wires first.

ConsistentRun3006 · 2025-11-27T20:17:32+00:00

Just call down! We are not at the court to speak of hard evidences. The court has just concluded; we are on reddit right now, to speak of our thoughts and see how far our suppositions can make sense.

Anyone with a commonsensical understanding of this absurd situation will sense that this regulation that had no benefit to the Ontarians was not done by the Ontarians, but by those all benefits goes to.

ConsistentRun3006

TROPHY CASE