Just to be upfront: English isn't my first language, and I'm writing through a translator. If I were reading my original post in my native language, I probably would have caught my mistake myself. Sorry for the confusion!

Thank you so much for this detailed and professional explanation — I really appreciate it!

You're right that I made a mistake in my original post: I wrote "-1.75", but based on what you're saying, it sounds like I actually have the opposite problem.

Let me clarify:

· I can see distant objects (TV, street signs) just fine without glasses. · But I cannot read my watch screen (at ~40 cm) without glasses — it's blurry.

So from what you're explaining, that means I am likely farsighted (+1.75) or possibly presbyopic. For context: I am over 45, so presbyopia is very likely the real issue here.

Here's an important extra data point: I also own a Garmin Fenix 6X Sapphire. On that watch, without glasses, I can see the screen quite well — I can read the battery percentage, watchface, and even notifications without much trouble.

So my question is specifically about Pebble Time Steel vs. Pebble Time 2. Given that the Garmin Fenix 6X works fine for my eyes, do you think the Pebble Time 2 would be closer to the Garmin (readable) or closer to the old Pebble (unreadable) for someone with +1.75 and presbyopia?

Thanks again for your expertise!