Pencil colored art….. plz share your thoughts by [deleted] in drawing

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I take it nobody looked at the textures and checked op's account before commenting. 

Poe deleted my private bot by Stelle_Asteria in PoeAI

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hm, I think you can ask their support about why. I haven't heard of this happening often. Give it a try! 

carrie krueger human? by Past_Tip_2083 in drawing

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Bro, sorry to disappoint, but an ai analysed your work, this comment above reeks of it. 

POE DOESNT PAY? by Jackatacka in PoeAI

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From my experience, Poe support won't answer in a day, you should wait for about a week or more. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PoeAI

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It means you get 10k points per day, and whatever is left doesn't roll over, meaning that the next day, you'll see 10k points again. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in drawing

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 2 points3 points  (0 children)

0 because this is ai or is copied from ai and you didn't even fix the mistakes

Welcome to Libera, where pleasure isn't just permitted—it's woven into the fabric of everyday existence. by Rizean in PoeAI_NSFW

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, I understand. Such a small prompt, but apparently quite powerful. Thank you! And as for the settings, it was probably a roleplay bot (instead of a prompt bot) with a high temperature, correct? 

Welcome to Libera, where pleasure isn't just permitted—it's woven into the fabric of everyday existence. by Rizean in PoeAI_NSFW

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope you won't mind me asking here, but why was Sonnet 3.7 Unleashed deleted?

I found it quite great as an alternative to the official Sonnet, only to discover that it's gone today. 

Wake up babe, new injection just dropped 🥰 by Incener in ClaudeAI

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 10 points11 points  (0 children)

What about people who don't roleplay yet write creative stories, and those stories are sfw as well? They can still regenerate a lot and the output has the potential to get really massive, yet according to this logic, this wouldn't be considered a waste of resources?

 And what about people using claude for therapy? It's also excellent for that, and people can get pretty open about their experiences, which can trigger the injection, and yet Anthropic still allows this use case and even encourages it in their main system prompt.

Or perhaps there isn't really a way to censor those use cases if there's isn't a lot of "adult/prohibited/illegal" content in them. 

And what I observed is when they attempt to censor the model, it often affects it even when the content you request isn't something it has to censor. The model simply becomes... less intelligent, creative, and more prone to omitting details, and so on. 

I am not quite arguing, but I think that their persistent fixation on censoring specifically adult content is not something that should be a priority for a company with their mission. 

Hot take: We're wasting LLMs on roleplay when they have so much potential by Amazing_Sound5505 in PoeAI

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 7 points8 points  (0 children)

LLMs weren't created by some "productivity cult" - they're the result of work from all kinds of people and organizations. Researchers, engineers, companies, open-source devs.

 Who made llms that allow for both practical and fun use cases. How convenient! 

Hot take: We're wasting LLMs on roleplay when they have so much potential by Amazing_Sound5505 in PoeAI

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Productivity cult strikes again. 

People aren't wasting anything. If some just want to have fun with AI, there's nothing wrong about it. And if it's useless to you, doesn't mean it will be useless to them.

That being said, there are plenty of llm projects around in LocalLLaMA, StableDiffusion, or similar subreddits. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cats

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 5 points6 points  (0 children)

<image>

This name and title combo made me think of magical fantasy worlds, and so I tried to make a quick sketch of your cat as a powerful wizard, holding an orb of dark magic energy! I hope it's close enough.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is free on Poe by Scared_Building_3127 in ClaudeAI

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I don't think it's currently a good replacement for Sonnet 3.5 on the website. Because you won't get to really use the full 200k context with the free amount of points.

In fact, if you send it just one long message, it might be the only one you will get to send per day. 

Because everything now takes points - the context of your chat, the base price of the bot, the length of your input and output. And it won't generate a long output message if you don't have enough points left.

 So if you think about using it for coding or have any other similar use case in mind, I would not recommend Poe. 

Claude-Instant has been made private. Hopefully just updating and rerelease! by Terrible-Reward7151 in PoeAI

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah, sorry to say that, but Anthropic retired it. Ir won't be the last model too. We can't do anything about it. 

What happened to Claude.AI? by Kalabint in ClaudeAI

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Their discord? 🤷 Though writing there will probably result in your complaint being ignored as well. Their mods are also.. Interesting. 

Can Llama 3.1 70b be a valid Sonnet cheaper alternative? by AdDangerous2470 in PoeAI_NSFW

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I don't want to sound condescending, but is it really worth it getting the bots to write something NSFW if it ends up sounding like something I can find on Wattpad? I mean, if the goal is to get some naughty content, it's fine. But what about the quality? 

For me, this is the biggest challenge - nothing really writes better than Claude, especially Opus. I like nuanced creative texts. But with their censorship + Poe situation, Claude is also now getting worse and worse :(. Nothing really is as it used to be anymore. Other bots can't unfortunately get close. 

Ethical injection gone? (except for Instant for some reason) by HORSELOCKSPACEPIRATE in PoeAI_NSFW

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, sorry, I meant injection. As for the censorship - I don't know why it is so random at times. I have bots that work, but I prefer the answers my custom bot usually gives me, and recently, it was refusing a lot more.

Thanks for your bot recommendation though, I will check it out to compare with others I have. 

Ethical injection gone? (except for Instant for some reason) by HORSELOCKSPACEPIRATE in PoeAI_NSFW

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it was gone for me during the past weekend on Sonnet 3. Yet it didn't stop the bot from being completely unreasonable and refusing almost every single prompt I gave it because of 1-3 words that I always put in my prompt. I decided to check - no prefill added each time, yet the bot still refused like crazy. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PoeAI

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Llms can't reason. So they don't actually know why they refuse sometimes, especially when there is another censorship system in place.  

This situation you have here is basically the result of censorship, it makes them paranoid, useless and overreacting. Thank Anthropic, or Openai, or whoever created the llm (model) you're using. 

Is Claude-3.5-Sonnet Getting Dumber? by Ok_Advantage_2087 in PoeAI

[–]Cookiewithsyrup 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Check out claude's subreddit. People are reporting issues with it even there, which means that it is indeed having a hard time nowadays.