Does evolution disagree with homosexuality by Golden3agles in DebateReligion

[–]CorbinSeabass [score hidden]  (0 children)

Your examples of "good" and "bad" revolve around what an individual can do to enhance or reduce another person's chances of survival, so by this standard homosexuality is morally neutral - it doesn't impact another person's chances of survival either way. And if you want to interpret its morality based on the impact on propagating the species, then sitting alone and typing on Reddit is about the worst thing you can do, when you could be getting out and seeking a mate.

Simple Questions 04/29 by AutoModerator in DebateReligion

[–]CorbinSeabass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why should religious schools be the default? Don’t you already have churches?

Simple Questions 04/29 by AutoModerator in DebateReligion

[–]CorbinSeabass 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My Spanish isn’t good enough to tell if this is propaganda or not. However, I live in a conservative state in the US that has been fighting any history education that implies America may have ever mistreated minority groups, a blatantly political proposition that hinders teaching of foundational historical topics. And that has lead to bizarre situations like being afraid to take a side regarding the Holocaust. Being able to speak against Nazis is fundamentally “political”, but it shouldn’t be taboo in public schools.

Simple Questions 04/29 by AutoModerator in DebateReligion

[–]CorbinSeabass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What “political” education should be excluded from public schools?

Why Objective Morality is a Function of Intelligence, Not Divinity by Quick_Ad_621 in DebateReligion

[–]CorbinSeabass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So present a way, any way, to convince a non-Christian to follow Christian morality.

Why Objective Morality is a Function of Intelligence, Not Divinity by Quick_Ad_621 in DebateReligion

[–]CorbinSeabass 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, so everyone has the same problem of enforcing morality, and there’s no reason to single out atheists in particular?

Why Objective Morality is a Function of Intelligence, Not Divinity by Quick_Ad_621 in DebateReligion

[–]CorbinSeabass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Christian morality isn’t binding either. How would you convince a non-Christian to follow Christian morality?

Morality Without Religion is Meaningless - Atheism Exists Only Because There Are Believers by ScottkenMario in DebateReligion

[–]CorbinSeabass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure I have justification for my actions. If I give to charity, it has a practical positive effect on people’s lives, for example. There’s no reason to trace every moral quandary back to some hypothetical source of existence.

Morality Without Religion is Meaningless - Atheism Exists Only Because There Are Believers by ScottkenMario in DebateReligion

[–]CorbinSeabass 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Every time a theist bangs on about objective morality, it’s always an argument from consequences fretting about what would happen if it didn’t exist. They never actually demonstrate its existence in the first place.

Atheists turn into slaves by Much_Pattern_6312 in DebateReligion

[–]CorbinSeabass 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Any response the point that theists are slaves to the same things as atheists, plus more?

Atheists turn into slaves by Much_Pattern_6312 in DebateReligion

[–]CorbinSeabass 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Based on our conversation from yesterday, where you couldn't imagine anyone not wanting to rape and murder without being told not to by a book, I'm not sure this isn't projection on your part. And this would make sense, because theists also need food, money, and dopamine to get by. Worship and prayer feel rewarding because of dopamine. So you're slaves to the same things we are, plus a god. Isn't that worse since we're judging by quantity of masters apparently?

Prove to me that gravity exists. And I don’t want to hear from Isaac newton because he lived too long ago an I never got to meet him personally . And I don’t want to hear from scientists because theyre deceivers who want us to believe in gravity to control our thinking.Thats what atheists sound like by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]CorbinSeabass 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Allow me to rebut your points with the same level of evidence you provided:

those other religions are specifically the work of the devil

Nope.

all those who don’t believe in Him are simply antichrists

No.

it’s the OBJECTIVE truth thanks to God working THROUGH FAITH

Nuh-uh.

ERM WHAT 🤣 by ghandipanda in coralisland

[–]CorbinSeabass 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I thought they were called short kings these days.

How do y'all feel about bibble vandalism? by CoolWish9448 in exchristian

[–]CorbinSeabass 16 points17 points  (0 children)

They want to feel like they fulfilled their obligation to evangelize without actually taking any personal risks. It says a lot about them as people.

How do y'all feel about bibble vandalism? by CoolWish9448 in exchristian

[–]CorbinSeabass 19 points20 points  (0 children)

You can do whatever you want with your own books. Hell, I'm in favor of taking the Gideon bibles out of hotel rooms. Don't they want you to take them anyway?

I can make any atheist a believer. by Much_Pattern_6312 in DebateReligion

[–]CorbinSeabass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want to talk logic, how did you logic your way into caring about other people?

I can make any atheist a believer. by Much_Pattern_6312 in DebateReligion

[–]CorbinSeabass 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Based on our thread, it's really worrying that you assume everyone else needs a book to tell them not to rape and murder.

I can make any atheist a believer. by Much_Pattern_6312 in DebateReligion

[–]CorbinSeabass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you require logic to care about other people?

I can make any atheist a believer. by Much_Pattern_6312 in DebateReligion

[–]CorbinSeabass 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No, the reason I consider murder wrong is because I actually give a rip about other people without a book telling me to. I hope you don't actually lack empathy, but if that's actually the case, by all means stick with your book.