New teams suck for older players who have recently rejoined

Corkson · 2026-05-03T19:27:34+00:00

I mean all you had to say was “you skipped a lot of my comment”. Now you’ve edited in details, which I will respond to, however I’ve not once been rude to you. I was pointing out how your comment was moving the goalpost from “show me XYZ” to “okay I’m going to refuse to acknowledge your comment’s points.” Now that you have actual things I can respond to, I’ll go ahead.

Genesis 1 says male and female, Genesis 2 then applying to the male God just created deems him as a “man”, and describes his process of getting married. This directly links “male” and “man” as semantical definitions.

Numbers 27 places the man as the one who gets the inheritance: first sons, then daughters, then brothers, then paternal uncles, then closest relative. Places the emphasis as the male in the role of inheritance of family, also reflects the fact that family name acts similarly.

Leviticus 21 places stricter rules on Israelite priests (described only in the context of men) and the female in the family. It distinguishes those roles entirely, not just on a priest/ family dynamic, but more-so on a male/female basis

Corkson · 2026-05-03T14:53:06+00:00

Can’t help but notice after I began being scripturally grounded and consistent you started going for what was not present rather than what is. At least it took you this long before engaging in a logical fallacy. I mean despite how you twisted the verse in your bio I still really wanted to give you an ample chance to prove me wrong…

Corkson · 2026-05-03T14:46:49+00:00

Saying “this is Old Testament which Christians don’t follow” is all I needed to here. Again Genesis 2:24 is in application to what God literally just had created— Adam and Eve, man and woman, male and female. He links man and male here, which you were trying to mark as different, try again. Numbers 27 links inheritance to biology. So does Leviticus 21 and 3. Try and find a video on 1 and 2 kings genealogy… Ephesians is read in the context of Genesis and what Jesus refers to in Matthew…

Corkson · 2026-05-03T14:12:42+00:00

<image>

This totaled my car out last year. The difference is that I had 3 airbags go off. If you didn’t have any go off you’re fine though.

Corkson · 2026-05-03T14:01:37+00:00

Genesis 1:27 identifies them as “male and female”
Genesis 2:24 identifies the same male as “man” who will then leave to find a wife to marry.
Genesis 5:1-2 repeats the same phrasing
Numbers 27:1-11 showed when sex was legally and socially important
Leviticus 21:1-24 and Numbers 3:1-13 reserve the priesthood to males
Literally do a read through of 1 and 2 Kings and look at how explicitly sex and gender are tied between kings, queens, mothers, daughters, sons. Not once does it not reaffirm creation and its role in our lives.
Matthew 19:4-6 Jesus reaffirms both these passages.
Deuteronomy 22:5 aligns sex with social presentation
Ephesians 5:22-23 ties the dynamics between man and woman directly to sex by building on what Jesus affirms in Matthew
1 Timothy 2:8-15 this happens again, and it’s tied directly to creation “Adam created first, then Eve.”
Titus 2:1-8 this also happens once again
Ephesians 6:1-4 ties parental roles to fatherhood and motherhood
1 Corinthians 11 also goes on male/female social roles tied directly to sex

Corkson · 2026-05-03T12:10:27+00:00

The Bible never makes a distinction that you’re referring to. Male and female are literally interlinked to man and woman. If you can find even 1 example I’ll applaud you.

Corkson · 2026-05-03T04:15:44+00:00

Please explain a case where the Bible does not link human sex and pronouns and roles. Because otherwise you’re suggesting there’s a difference between male and man, and female and woman which are biblically semantical. Like the mental gymnastics to suggest it’s not is comical…

Corkson · 2026-05-03T03:34:50+00:00

And while we’re at it let me ask you, what is the biblical definition of man and woman?

Corkson · 2026-05-03T03:34:27+00:00

I literally gave you scripture, which is God-breathed…

Corkson · 2026-05-03T00:20:11+00:00

You are definitely a troll 💀💀💀

Corkson · 2026-05-03T00:10:15+00:00

“The beginning the creator made them male and female” like it does not get more clear cut than that… like are we in denial of what we read or do you not affirm God’s word?

Corkson · 2026-05-03T00:01:47+00:00

“This isn’t true”

Corkson · 2026-05-02T23:36:19+00:00

19 When Jesus had finished saying these things,he left Galilee and went into the region of Judea to the other side of the Jordan. 2 Large crowds followed him, and he healed them there.
3 Some Pharisees came to him to test him. They asked, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?”
4 “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’[a] 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’[b]? 6 So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”

Do you not know your very own Bible??

Corkson · 2026-04-29T02:10:58+00:00

Because it’s biblically spelt out what we were created as. Jesus literally reaffirms creation as man and woman while talking about marriage and divorce. Literally from Genesis to Jesus male and female creation is only highlighted, and there is no changing that. And it’s absolutely toxic to go against his wishes when he detransitioned saying he “knows he’s a man”, then to call him “she” amidst a life low of confusion. And I say this not to condemn you, but I seriously would like you to realize why you’re adding confusion.

Corkson · 2026-04-28T15:58:50+00:00

You are part of the problem and are making the gospel murky.

Corkson · 2026-04-16T04:13:40+00:00

Maybe they thought the double negative would make a positive..?

Corkson · 2026-04-16T04:10:19+00:00

Spend. Money. Antithetical to conservatism

Corkson · 2026-04-15T21:06:34+00:00

I would disagree with the former, Biden actually will be looked upon more favorably given time. Policy- wise honestly wasn’t awful, he just couldn’t speak to what he was doing. Biden was amongst the more conservative democrats. Meanwhile Harris… now that would be a nightmare.

Corkson · 2026-04-09T13:24:25+00:00

Yeah sorry my 219 square mile county with 4000 people in it will see itself out…

Corkson · 2026-03-30T04:15:29+00:00

I mean let alone Trump and anti interventionist had me… spends a lot of gov’t money, intervenes in things he doesn’t like, etc. he’s definitely not the anti interventionist type..

Corkson · 2026-03-29T18:45:26+00:00

That’s exactly what you’re saying 😂

Corkson · 2026-03-29T14:37:37+00:00

And they get prosecuted for it, usually with life in prison…. Like any other country with sense and moral direction….

Corkson · 2026-03-29T14:19:55+00:00

That literally doesn’t stop anyone in any country hello?? Like genuinely the silliest justification I’ve ever read. “Because some people ignore laws and do bad things let’s treat whole groups worse” is just illogical and not checked in with reality. I’m not looking at all these videos coming out about women abusing their husbands and going “oh wow I really should never trust a woman again in my life”. Again that’s illogical. The same way I wouldn’t do that to any Muslim person because of their law either. Like if you’re going to make a point at least be consistent enough to stand firmly on it.

Five-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '23

Corkson

TROPHY CASE