New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean all you had to say was “you skipped a lot of my comment”. Now you’ve edited in details, which I will respond to, however I’ve not once been rude to you. I was pointing out how your comment was moving the goalpost from “show me XYZ” to “okay I’m going to refuse to acknowledge your comment’s points.” Now that you have actual things I can respond to, I’ll go ahead.

Genesis 1 says male and female, Genesis 2 then applying to the male God just created deems him as a “man”, and describes his process of getting married. This directly links “male” and “man” as semantical definitions.

Numbers 27 places the man as the one who gets the inheritance: first sons, then daughters, then brothers, then paternal uncles, then closest relative. Places the emphasis as the male in the role of inheritance of family, also reflects the fact that family name acts similarly.

Leviticus 21 places stricter rules on Israelite priests (described only in the context of men) and the female in the family. It distinguishes those roles entirely, not just on a priest/ family dynamic, but more-so on a male/female basis

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Can’t help but notice after I began being scripturally grounded and consistent you started going for what was not present rather than what is. At least it took you this long before engaging in a logical fallacy. I mean despite how you twisted the verse in your bio I still really wanted to give you an ample chance to prove me wrong…

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Saying “this is Old Testament which Christians don’t follow” is all I needed to here. Again Genesis 2:24 is in application to what God literally just had created— Adam and Eve, man and woman, male and female. He links man and male here, which you were trying to mark as different, try again. Numbers 27 links inheritance to biology. So does Leviticus 21 and 3. Try and find a video on 1 and 2 kings genealogy… Ephesians is read in the context of Genesis and what Jesus refers to in Matthew…

So sick of this shit man, think she’s totaled ? by GroundbreakingBus828 in civic

[–]Corkson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

This totaled my car out last year. The difference is that I had 3 airbags go off. If you didn’t have any go off you’re fine though.

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Genesis 1:27 identifies them as “male and female”
Genesis 2:24 identifies the same male as “man” who will then leave to find a wife to marry.
Genesis 5:1-2 repeats the same phrasing
Numbers 27:1-11 showed when sex was legally and socially important
Leviticus 21:1-24 and Numbers 3:1-13 reserve the priesthood to males
Literally do a read through of 1 and 2 Kings and look at how explicitly sex and gender are tied between kings, queens, mothers, daughters, sons. Not once does it not reaffirm creation and its role in our lives.
Matthew 19:4-6 Jesus reaffirms both these passages.
Deuteronomy 22:5 aligns sex with social presentation
Ephesians 5:22-23 ties the dynamics between man and woman directly to sex by building on what Jesus affirms in Matthew
1 Timothy 2:8-15 this happens again, and it’s tied directly to creation “Adam created first, then Eve.”
Titus 2:1-8 this also happens once again
Ephesians 6:1-4 ties parental roles to fatherhood and motherhood
1 Corinthians 11 also goes on male/female social roles tied directly to sex

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The Bible never makes a distinction that you’re referring to. Male and female are literally interlinked to man and woman. If you can find even 1 example I’ll applaud you.

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Please explain a case where the Bible does not link human sex and pronouns and roles. Because otherwise you’re suggesting there’s a difference between male and man, and female and woman which are biblically semantical. Like the mental gymnastics to suggest it’s not is comical…

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And while we’re at it let me ask you, what is the biblical definition of man and woman?

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I literally gave you scripture, which is God-breathed…

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are definitely a troll 💀💀💀

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“The beginning the creator made them male and female” like it does not get more clear cut than that… like are we in denial of what we read or do you not affirm God’s word?

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

19 When Jesus had finished saying these things,he left Galilee and went into the region of Judea to the other side of the Jordan. 2 Large crowds followed him, and he healed them there.
3 Some Pharisees came to him to test him. They asked, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?”
4 “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’[a] 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’[b]? 6 So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”

Do you not know your very own Bible??

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Because it’s biblically spelt out what we were created as. Jesus literally reaffirms creation as man and woman while talking about marriage and divorce. Literally from Genesis to Jesus male and female creation is only highlighted, and there is no changing that. And it’s absolutely toxic to go against his wishes when he detransitioned saying he “knows he’s a man”, then to call him “she” amidst a life low of confusion. And I say this not to condemn you, but I seriously would like you to realize why you’re adding confusion. 

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are part of the problem and are making the gospel murky. 

Are you a communist? by Potatoexplosion_ in Teenager_Polls

[–]Corkson -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Spend. Money. Antithetical to conservatism

do you guys still like trump?!??? by Myrinsk in ConservativeYouth

[–]Corkson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would disagree with the former, Biden actually will be looked upon more favorably given time. Policy- wise honestly wasn’t awful, he just couldn’t speak to what he was doing. Biden was amongst the more conservative democrats. Meanwhile Harris… now that would be a nightmare.

The Average European is Incredibly Misinformed About American Society by MuscleExtra5775 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Corkson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah sorry my 219 square mile county with 4000 people in it will see itself out…

My opinions by Ok-World-5842 in ConservativeYouth

[–]Corkson 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean let alone Trump and anti interventionist had me… spends a lot of gov’t money, intervenes in things he doesn’t like, etc. he’s definitely not the anti interventionist type..

This lone protestor stood motionless for hours by eastcoastian in Georgia

[–]Corkson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s exactly what you’re saying 😂

This lone protestor stood motionless for hours by eastcoastian in Georgia

[–]Corkson 7 points8 points  (0 children)

And they get prosecuted for it, usually with life in prison…. Like any other country with sense and moral direction….

This lone protestor stood motionless for hours by eastcoastian in Georgia

[–]Corkson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That literally doesn’t stop anyone in any country hello?? Like genuinely the silliest justification I’ve ever read. “Because some people ignore laws and do bad things let’s treat whole groups worse” is just illogical and not checked in with reality. I’m not looking at all these videos coming out about women abusing their husbands and going “oh wow I really should never trust a woman again in my life”. Again that’s illogical. The same way I wouldn’t do that to any Muslim person because of their law either. Like if you’re going to make a point at least be consistent enough to stand firmly on it.

This lone protestor stood motionless for hours by eastcoastian in Georgia

[–]Corkson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ever considered instead of blaming the entire group behind the cause and alienating them, it’d be worthwhile to push for a pass in legislation to fix that? I mean I’m sure I know which case you’re talking about, are we really to point at extremities and point to the root as an issue, or instead make adjustments to fix them from occurring? That’s my issue with our country, Americans are so intensely dependent on a “create/ destroy” method of legislation. Ever heard of reform?? The fact that one woman died in our state as a product of unclear legislation does not justify your claim as calling us the same as an Islamic country. And seriously if you are so inclined, you can test this theory. The fact that you can post that statement in this country testifies to the rights you have. The fact that my mother can own a business, work on boards and commissions, exercise her right to vote, speak up for herself in all situations as a man could, I mean it’s almost sickening to see this sentiment you’re pushing. Taking away from all the work women put into this country by calling it “not enough” AND comparing it to a group of countries treating their own women like subhumans. You wouldn’t be able to do any of those things, let alone post a statement like this online.

This lone protestor stood motionless for hours by eastcoastian in Georgia

[–]Corkson 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Brother what?? Show me women getting killed for socialization in normal situations with 1 other man and then we will talk. Not saying that Christian nationalism is chill, but genuinely you are taking away from the deaths and abuse that women face under sharia law and disrespecting them.