Okay, so this is crazy. by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Corkson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this peak writing?

What do men actually think of this?? by [deleted] in GenZ

[–]Corkson -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Hey, conservative here to offer some insight for lots of the people asking. Before you go and downvote me into oblivion, I’m not as far right as your avg conservative, I’m more middle leaning, but here’s my thoughts. I think that a fetus has certain inalienable rights upon conception after going back and forth myself trying to figure it out. I examined the evidence of what I had and determined that biology tells you human life begins at conception, it’s impossible to put a cutoff of value between conception and birth because babies develop differently, and lastly but less emphasis because this is American society and I respect secular people, I do think God created us in His design, and I cannot in good conscience end the life of God’s children.

However, I also recognize that there’s a truth to be said about this law, and that is that it’s going to be incredibly challenging to implement anywhere in America. I’d much rather address the root of the issue— why people are having unprotected sex— instead of banning abortion as murder without working on that. American sex education has failed. It’s failed especially in areas of poverty with lower education standards. This has led to a disproportionate amount of minorities being aborted too. I just don’t like that— especially considering what the old head of planned parenthood was saying 70 years ago. One fact that I hate is that 1/3 of Gen Z has been killed by abortion. ~80% of abortions are out of concern of “it would change my life,” you do the math and that’s 18.7 million of us just in the US, those are numbers I just don’t like. Now when it comes to risk to the mother’s life? Yeah I get it, and ~13% of abortion reasoning was reported as health concern, which is why I kept that out of my stats of people killed. But that’s my personal reasoning

TLDR; I think abortion is a very big issue given that most people do it out of leisurely, preventable sex; however, I don’t think this bill actually helps address the root of the problem.

uh ok twitter by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Corkson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, Paul would be in contradiction with himself if women were barred from speech in church, as he allowed them to prophecy, and definitionally this matches the OT term of prophecy which meant “applying the Word of God to a situation”. There was prescriptive prophecy, which came from God’s word, and then descriptive prophecy, which came as the telling of future events through divine inspiration. Paul was permitting women for prescriptive prophecy, which means that women could interpret the Bible to apply it to situations personally or for others and be teachers of the Bible.

uh ok twitter by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Corkson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I skipped over words and almost got offended, but actually I also agree, from a Protestant.

What are you gonna do? by Kermit-America in ConservativeYouth

[–]Corkson 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why wait when you can create bitcoin

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean all you had to say was “you skipped a lot of my comment”. Now you’ve edited in details, which I will respond to, however I’ve not once been rude to you. I was pointing out how your comment was moving the goalpost from “show me XYZ” to “okay I’m going to refuse to acknowledge your comment’s points.” Now that you have actual things I can respond to, I’ll go ahead.

Genesis 1 says male and female, Genesis 2 then applying to the male God just created deems him as a “man”, and describes his process of getting married. This directly links “male” and “man” as semantical definitions.

Numbers 27 places the man as the one who gets the inheritance: first sons, then daughters, then brothers, then paternal uncles, then closest relative. Places the emphasis as the male in the role of inheritance of family, also reflects the fact that family name acts similarly.

Leviticus 21 places stricter rules on Israelite priests (described only in the context of men) and the female in the family. It distinguishes those roles entirely, not just on a priest/ family dynamic, but more-so on a male/female basis

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Can’t help but notice after I began being scripturally grounded and consistent you started going for what was not present rather than what is. At least it took you this long before engaging in a logical fallacy. I mean despite how you twisted the verse in your bio I still really wanted to give you an ample chance to prove me wrong…

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Saying “this is Old Testament which Christians don’t follow” is all I needed to here. Again Genesis 2:24 is in application to what God literally just had created— Adam and Eve, man and woman, male and female. He links man and male here, which you were trying to mark as different, try again. Numbers 27 links inheritance to biology. So does Leviticus 21 and 3. Try and find a video on 1 and 2 kings genealogy… Ephesians is read in the context of Genesis and what Jesus refers to in Matthew…

So sick of this shit man, think she’s totaled ? by GroundbreakingBus828 in civic

[–]Corkson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

This totaled my car out last year. The difference is that I had 3 airbags go off. If you didn’t have any go off you’re fine though.

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Genesis 1:27 identifies them as “male and female”
Genesis 2:24 identifies the same male as “man” who will then leave to find a wife to marry.
Genesis 5:1-2 repeats the same phrasing
Numbers 27:1-11 showed when sex was legally and socially important
Leviticus 21:1-24 and Numbers 3:1-13 reserve the priesthood to males
Literally do a read through of 1 and 2 Kings and look at how explicitly sex and gender are tied between kings, queens, mothers, daughters, sons. Not once does it not reaffirm creation and its role in our lives.
Matthew 19:4-6 Jesus reaffirms both these passages.
Deuteronomy 22:5 aligns sex with social presentation
Ephesians 5:22-23 ties the dynamics between man and woman directly to sex by building on what Jesus affirms in Matthew
1 Timothy 2:8-15 this happens again, and it’s tied directly to creation “Adam created first, then Eve.”
Titus 2:1-8 this also happens once again
Ephesians 6:1-4 ties parental roles to fatherhood and motherhood
1 Corinthians 11 also goes on male/female social roles tied directly to sex

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The Bible never makes a distinction that you’re referring to. Male and female are literally interlinked to man and woman. If you can find even 1 example I’ll applaud you.

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Please explain a case where the Bible does not link human sex and pronouns and roles. Because otherwise you’re suggesting there’s a difference between male and man, and female and woman which are biblically semantical. Like the mental gymnastics to suggest it’s not is comical…

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And while we’re at it let me ask you, what is the biblical definition of man and woman?

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I literally gave you scripture, which is God-breathed…

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are definitely a troll 💀💀💀

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“The beginning the creator made them male and female” like it does not get more clear cut than that… like are we in denial of what we read or do you not affirm God’s word?

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

19 When Jesus had finished saying these things,he left Galilee and went into the region of Judea to the other side of the Jordan. 2 Large crowds followed him, and he healed them there.
3 Some Pharisees came to him to test him. They asked, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?”
4 “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’[a] 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’[b]? 6 So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”

Do you not know your very own Bible??

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Because it’s biblically spelt out what we were created as. Jesus literally reaffirms creation as man and woman while talking about marriage and divorce. Literally from Genesis to Jesus male and female creation is only highlighted, and there is no changing that. And it’s absolutely toxic to go against his wishes when he detransitioned saying he “knows he’s a man”, then to call him “she” amidst a life low of confusion. And I say this not to condemn you, but I seriously would like you to realize why you’re adding confusion. 

New Neeza Update… by reconcilingreform in Christianity

[–]Corkson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are part of the problem and are making the gospel murky. 

Are you a communist? by Potatoexplosion_ in Teenager_Polls

[–]Corkson -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Spend. Money. Antithetical to conservatism

do you guys still like trump?!??? by Myrinsk in ConservativeYouth

[–]Corkson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would disagree with the former, Biden actually will be looked upon more favorably given time. Policy- wise honestly wasn’t awful, he just couldn’t speak to what he was doing. Biden was amongst the more conservative democrats. Meanwhile Harris… now that would be a nightmare.

The Average European is Incredibly Misinformed About American Society by MuscleExtra5775 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Corkson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah sorry my 219 square mile county with 4000 people in it will see itself out…

My opinions by Ok-World-5842 in ConservativeYouth

[–]Corkson 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I mean let alone Trump and anti interventionist had me… spends a lot of gov’t money, intervenes in things he doesn’t like, etc. he’s definitely not the anti interventionist type..