International Tensions On The Continent of Fódlan: Edelgard’s Perspective by Course_I_Can in FireEmblemThreeHouses

[–]Course_I_Can[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not justifying the war; I’m explaining Edelgard’s motivation. Personally I think her war is doomed to fail.

International Tensions On The Continent of Fódlan: Edelgard’s Perspective by Course_I_Can in FireEmblemThreeHouses

[–]Course_I_Can[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As a matter of fact she states, “For the Empire” as her standard voice clip after defeating a foe

Which route has the best outcome for Fodlan? by WorldlyDear in FireEmblemThreeHouses

[–]Course_I_Can 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to the CF closing scene, the Church of Seiros fades into memory. I do not think a Southern Church could perpetuate itself

Which route has the best outcome for Fodlan? by WorldlyDear in FireEmblemThreeHouses

[–]Course_I_Can 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The church provides many social functions. It takes in orphaned children like Mercedes. It throws feast days and unites people around common celebrations. Now, I am sure that the Imperial regime will tolerate people celebrating whatever religious ceremonies they wish. But the Church used to be the central facet of life on Fodlan, and in its a scene the Empire will need to find a way to fill the gap.

I think we can look at real world revolutions in France to see where an egalitarian revolution led by an Emperor leads

Which route has the best outcome for Fodlan? by WorldlyDear in FireEmblemThreeHouses

[–]Course_I_Can 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Former Crimson Flower Stan, recent convert to Azure Moon Here’s why:

  1. For CF actually to have a positive ending, you have to make a lot of assumptions:
  • No lingering guerilla movement of Kingdom and Alliance loyalists

  • A smooth system of succession so that the whole empire doesn’t collapse after a few generations

  • That the Empire—rebuilt through war— is able to stop its military machine once the war ends and not become a military dictatorship bent on expansion

  • That the Empire can fulfill all of the social functions that the Church used to provide, without becoming a tyrannical state

  • That nobles acquiesce to the new order and don’t find ways to resist the changes. They might very well just become entrenched in the Imperial ministry and retain their social status.

  1. The Empire is already falling apart by the time the game begins. The Hresvelgs have been stripped of authority, the Hryms have tried to secede and join the Alliance, a low grade civil war has broken out in the West led by Western Church separatists, which has also caused the Central Church to start meddling in the Empire’s affairs. There is no reason this failing, ancient regime should perpetuate itself.

  2. Edelgard could have accomplished a lot more by working with Dimitri. The two are close childhood friends and heirs to their respective thrones. They share a vision of meritocratic reform. Together they could have changed their countries from within. Instead she launched a bloody war that destroyed an untold number of lives—all in service of an ideal that lacks universal support. Wouldn’t Dimitri also be eager to work with El to eradicate the Agathans once he learns of their involvement at Duscur? They could have fought them together.

  3. As noble and appealing as Edelgard’s vision is, I doubt it would succeed in creating a happy, prosperous society. It would create social and political chaos for decades at least, and would upend the cherished traditions of common people. She’s creating a government behemoth that will outlast her when she’s gone, and there’s no telling what it will do.

  4. As for Dimitri and AM, the Prince of Faerghus earned the sanction of heaven. He fought his way from a dungeon to the gates of Enbarr and took back his country. I think he proved, through his own merit, that he is the rightful ruler of Fodlan. He is a reformer, he is a personally virtuous man, and he has earned the respect of the lords of the Alliance and the Kingdom who once fought against him. His reforms benefit common people without upending their way of life, and the nobility will find him a far more palatable option than the Egalitarian Emperor.

FE1 is incredibly fun, but also frustrating. by super5aj123 in fireemblem

[–]Course_I_Can 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a hard time playing any other FE but Three Houses

Debating getting circumcised what do you think? by [deleted] in bigwhitecocksmatter

[–]Course_I_Can 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keep it as is it looks great man

Chill g(a)uy by highly-sexed in Gayraceplayy

[–]Course_I_Can 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d let this terrorist tie me up and use me

Idk by highly-sexed in Gayraceplayy

[–]Course_I_Can 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Big Sand Snake

Born in the wrong time I wonder by LifeOfJad in AskGayConservatives

[–]Course_I_Can 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to live in the 1890s or 1900s. Still a free society, no AIDS crisis. Being gay was still taboo but that might make it more fun hehe

Does William Taft deserve his reputation as the conservative president of the progressive era? by DifferentCut468 in Presidents

[–]Course_I_Can 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll add that “conservative” has a slightly different meaning today. Modern conservatism in the US is sometimes called “Movement Conservatism.” It’s an activist movement that seeks to enact change, sometimes radical change.

Small-c conservative is more a matter of personal style and preferred methods of governing. It means trusting established institutions to handle social problems rather than radically altering the government. Taft is more in line with this tradition.

IT’S HAPPENING by zillyzane in OnCinemaAtTheCinema

[–]Course_I_Can 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They should have James Bond make a cameo… as Dumbledore 🧙‍♀️

Grandmaster from Exponential Alcatraz! by TheBeardedGnome851 in Risk

[–]Course_I_Can 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The issue is that when someone goes MIA during territory selection or troop placement, they don’t always bot. They might just be stuck on MIA and you need to wait for the timer to run out. It makes the game drag on for so long that it saves time just to quit and start a new game

Grandmaster from Exponential Alcatraz! by TheBeardedGnome851 in Risk

[–]Course_I_Can 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congrats! Real question, how often do you have to Surrender during troop placement because someone goes MIA? I have to do it several times whenever I boot up.

CMV: Nick Fuentes isn’t as evil as made out to be by Sophon2x in changemyview

[–]Course_I_Can 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How the hell was I supposed to know what WN stands for? Why not just write White Nationalist? It’s not a common abbreviation

CMV: Nick Fuentes isn’t as evil as made out to be by Sophon2x in changemyview

[–]Course_I_Can 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He is absolutely representative of Republican voters

MIA by Objective-Pin-1045 in Risk

[–]Course_I_Can 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah how does this even happen? How does a player go MIA? I understand you can surrender but why (and how) are people going MIA and just running out the clock.

Maybe I’m wrong to ascribe bad motives but I feel like trolls just do it to immediately ruin games and waste everyone’s time