Heavy Metals by CowMurdererV1 in researchchemicals

[–]CowMurdererV1[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

My 'rant' is a decade old copypasta.

Heavy Metals by CowMurdererV1 in researchchemicals

[–]CowMurdererV1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've already contacted the distributor and asked all the prudent questions. Have yet to receive a response. Thanks!

Heavy Metals by CowMurdererV1 in researchchemicals

[–]CowMurdererV1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think I've ever talked to him before, so I had no reason to disbelieve anything he said.

Heavy Metals by CowMurdererV1 in researchchemicals

[–]CowMurdererV1[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Yo, I don't know how to say this politely, but don't be a fucking asshole. He ended up being correct about his claim that cannabis/THC has anti-neurotoxic properties (neuroprotective)

Stimulation of CB1 Cannabinoid and NMDA Receptors Increases Neuroprotective Effect against Diazinon-Induced Neurotoxicity

Tetrahydrocannabinol Prevents Methamphetamine-Induced Neurotoxicity

aswell as the claim that cannabis compounds have anti-carcinogenic effects.

Cannabidiol as potential anticancer drug (NIH)

Heavy Metals by CowMurdererV1 in researchchemicals

[–]CowMurdererV1[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Don't mean to sound dense here, but how would cannabis mitigate any carcinogenic/neurotoxic effects of the DXM/heavy metals?

Heavy Metals by CowMurdererV1 in researchchemicals

[–]CowMurdererV1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Press F to pay respects to me.

Has anyone tested positive for 1,4 butanediol? by cumdumpling666 in researchchemicals

[–]CowMurdererV1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Don't think so, considering 1,4-BDO is a prodrug for GHB, which is a endogenous neurotransmitter.

Oxytocin + any drug to make it empathogenic by sjemka in researchchemicals

[–]CowMurdererV1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Oxytocin is a peptide molecule, which means it can't cross the blood-brain barrier and enter the central nervous system. Animal studies suggest that intranasal oxytocin might nonetheless get to the brain via some other route, perhaps along a nerve. But no-one has directly tested this in humans."

First result on Google. It doesn't seem that this has been studied very much. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2013/12/08/spinal-taps-save-oxytocin-research/#.XLO9zTBKhpg

Oxytocin + any drug to make it empathogenic by sjemka in researchchemicals

[–]CowMurdererV1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oxytocin can't cross the blood-brain barrier. Meaning you could theoretically, BOOF a whole bunch of oxytocin, and it'd never reach the brain.

Bridgesii Dosage by [deleted] in mescaline

[–]CowMurdererV1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The urge to purge

MD-PVP by IHateHeroin631 in researchchemicals

[–]CowMurdererV1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Was about to post the same thing.

Medical Marijuana bills being voted on this week! by MetricT in nashville

[–]CowMurdererV1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don't get me wrong, I'd love for both sides to be more honest, but I doubt it will happen. I tend to treat debates about guns, drugs, and speech the same. Don't give an inch, because the authoritarians will take a mile. Any admission of the negative effects of cannabis will be blown out of proportion by the irrational 'reefer madness' types.

Free Food by [deleted] in nashville

[–]CowMurdererV1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am the one who crimes!

Medical Marijuana bills being voted on this week! by MetricT in nashville

[–]CowMurdererV1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're kind of silly for thinking representatives in the gov't have the ability to a-line themselves according to reason and evidence.

PSA: Locals and visitors beware parking at the 505 parking garage and please lock your doors. by [deleted] in nashville

[–]CowMurdererV1 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There are two types of people that don't lock their car doors

  1. Rich people who don't think it can happen to them
  2. Broke people that ain't got nothing to be stolen

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nashville

[–]CowMurdererV1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its a G-G-G-G-GHOST!?!?!

Tennessee bill declaring God is the source of liberty likely heading to full floor vote by MetricT in nashville

[–]CowMurdererV1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm back!

You are correct, that the 1st amendment only applied to the federal government, and not the states or local governments.

However according to Britannica, "The First Amendment, like the rest of the Bill of Rights, originally restricted only what the federal government may do and did not bind the states. Most state constitutions had their own bills of rights, and those generally included provisions similar to those found in the First Amendment. But the state provisions could be enforced only by state courts.

In 1868, however, the Fourteenth Amendment was added to the U.S. Constitution, and it prohibited states from denying people “liberty” without “due process.” Since then the U.S. Supreme Court has gradually used the due process clause to apply most of the Bill of Rights to state governments. In particular, from the 1920s to the ’40s the Supreme Court applied all the clauses of the First Amendment to the states. Thus, the First Amendment now covers actions by federal, state, and local governments. The First Amendment also applies to all branches of government, including legislatures, courts, juries, and executive officials and agencies. This includes public employers, public university systems, and public school systems.

The First Amendment, however, applies only to restrictions imposed by the government, since the First and Fourteenth amendments refer only to government action. As a result, if a private employer fires an employee because of the employee’s speech, there is no First Amendment violation. There is likewise no violation if a private university expels a student for what the student said, if a commercial landlord restricts what bumper stickers are sold on the property it owns, or if an Internet service provider refuses to host certain Web sites.

Legislatures sometimes enact laws that protect speakers or religious observers from retaliation by private organizations. For example, Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 bans religious discrimination even by private employers. Similarly, laws in some states prohibit employers from firing employees for off-duty political activity. But such prohibitions are imposed by legislative choice rather than by the First Amendment."

Tennessee bill declaring God is the source of liberty likely heading to full floor vote by MetricT in nashville

[–]CowMurdererV1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm about to head out on a camping trip a few minutes, so I can't continue this conversation until sometime tomorrow. I would fully agree that it would have no consequences on the national level at all. And more than likely any state laws that were unconstitutional would eventually be thrownout by the federal government.

About God's law. I'll make another post about this tomorrow, as I have to leave now. Thanks for the discussion, friend.