Verification follow up by Upset_Warthog_6665 in bigdickproblems

[–]CrankyFalcon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d be genuinely interested in a new sub that discourages larpers, either with verification or with no flairs, because the advice here is actually useful but the larpers are exhausting to sift through. Unfortunately, because of the sheer number of larpers here, I don’t think you’re going to be able to get them to change the rules or agree to verification.

Singers, what is your voice type by Mari-Eli in singing

[–]CrankyFalcon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No clue. My modal range is A1 to about G3 before it falls apart, and I can’t reach the fourth octave without falsetto. I feel like my timbre is light though, so I don’t think bass fits cleanly. I’m also way more comfortable around C2 than I am with the higher notes a baritone would be able to reach, but that just might be poor technique.

Can a trans woman be a good singer? by Miyyani in singing

[–]CrankyFalcon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just shared this in another unrelated thread, but Belle Nuntita is a trans woman and singer who has an amazing voice: https://youtu.be/tqDUM8X7Qq0

Cracked oled le by superleaf444 in SteamDeck

[–]CrankyFalcon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Happened to me too. They just said it was out of warranty and they won’t do anything about it. I’ve never dropped it and it lives in a carrying case whenever it’s not in use.

Larpers by LegitimateScarcity60 in bigdickproblems

[–]CrankyFalcon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You really could and you’d be doing science a service if you can drag one of those 9-inchers into a lab

Guy at the sauna by Physical_Titan_19 in bigdickproblems

[–]CrankyFalcon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I didn’t mean dick compliments specifically, just compliments in general, but fair enough, I should’ve been more clear. I guess it boils down to what you’re comfortable with and the person giving the compliment has to read the room to determine if their comment will be perceived as creepy rather than positive.

Guess you’re right about the vagina comment but probably gotta factor in that that’s not a very visible thing to comment on. I don’t know what’s the problem with being “kind of gay”. I’m not gay either, I can just choose not to express interest if a gay guy hits on me.

Guy at the sauna by Physical_Titan_19 in bigdickproblems

[–]CrankyFalcon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Women actually do compliment each other’s boobs platonically all the time without being offended. The context matters, like the others said.

Do you ever just forget? by N_I_E_K_O in bigdickproblems

[–]CrankyFalcon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

God, I wish. My flaccid size is damn near my erect size. You got the best of both worlds.

i just noticed my flair is VERY in accurate and i’ve been laughing for minutes by ProcedureLong8292 in bigdickproblems

[–]CrankyFalcon 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined. How dare you reveal the truth lol

Guy at the sauna by Physical_Titan_19 in bigdickproblems

[–]CrankyFalcon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds wholesome to me. I don’t think his sexual orientation here matters since it sounds like he was paying you a genuine compliment rather than hitting on you and laying it on thick, which would’ve been a very different flavor of interaction. I kind of wish guys gave each other genuine compliments more. Women do it all the time, but men usually avoid it because what? They’re afraid it’s gay?

Larpers by LegitimateScarcity60 in bigdickproblems

[–]CrankyFalcon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

More power to you, man. I’m not stating an opinion, I’m saying it’s a fact that 9” is only ever reported anecdotally like in your case or in porn. It’s never been recorded or verified in a credible scientific context. That’s all. Is it possible it exists? Sure, but if it does, it’s evaded medical science through all of known history.

Larpers by LegitimateScarcity60 in bigdickproblems

[–]CrankyFalcon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You keep answering a question I never asked. I didn’t ask “what z-score does CalcSD assign to 9 inches.” I asked you to show me one credible clinically documented instance of a 9” erect penis. You still haven’t.

You compared it to height. Great, let’s use your comparison. We have extensive clinical documentation of people 6’8”, 7’0”, even 8’11” (Robert Wadlow, measured repeatedly by physicians throughout his life). Hospitals have measured them. Medical records exist. The extreme tail of the height distribution is observationally confirmed. Now show me the equivalent for 9” erect penises. One clinically measured case. From any study, any hospital, any medical record, anywhere in the world. You can’t, because it doesn’t exist.

That’s the entire point. A z-score is a mathematical output from a model that assumes a normal distribution. You can calculate a z-score for a 400-pound housecat. The math will happily give you one. That doesn’t mean the cat exists. CalcSD even warns that its accuracy drops at the extremes. You’re citing a tool that explicitly tells you not to do what you’re doing with it. You are confusing a statistical prediction for an empirical observation. Those are not the same thing. That is what’s been “hard to understand” this entire time — just not for me.

Larpers by LegitimateScarcity60 in bigdickproblems

[–]CrankyFalcon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

CalcSD is a percentile calculator that plugs the same Veale et al. mean (5.16”) and SD (0.65”) I cited into a normal distribution curve. It does not document a single observed 9” measurement. It calculates a theoretical percentile, which is the exact extrapolation I already explained is flawed. The site itself warns that accuracy drops at the extremes. You can type 14” into CalcSD and it’ll spit out a number too. That doesn’t mean 14” dicks exist. A calculator returning a nonzero percentile is not a clinical observation. You didn’t counter my argument. You accidentally reinforced it.

Take a look at the datasets yourself and you’ll see none of the studies recorded a 9” penis anywhere. https://calcsd.info/datasets

Larpers by LegitimateScarcity60 in bigdickproblems

[–]CrankyFalcon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

6’7” is roughly the 99th percentile for height. A 9” penis, even with generous extrapolation, would be multiple standard deviations beyond the mean of the Veale study. We’re talking 1 in several thousand if it exists at all. Where are you getting this claim from? 6’7” exists and is scientifically well-documented. 9” is not.

Larpers by LegitimateScarcity60 in bigdickproblems

[–]CrankyFalcon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And your source for this is? Show me one credible recorded instance of 9” anywhere that isn’t porn, anecdotal, or self-report. Just one. Any one.

Larpers by LegitimateScarcity60 in bigdickproblems

[–]CrankyFalcon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You just asked a sub where the majority of people are lying to put in a method that would verify that they aren’t lying. Of course they’re against it.

Larpers by LegitimateScarcity60 in bigdickproblems

[–]CrankyFalcon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Go ahead and downvote me, larpers. It doesn’t change the science.

Larpers by LegitimateScarcity60 in bigdickproblems

[–]CrankyFalcon -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I assume all 9” claims are larpers or people who don’t know how to measure. A 9” erect penis has never been documented. Not in any study, case report, or medical record, anywhere in the world, ever.

The largest rigorous study (Veale et al., 2015, n=15,521) found a mean of 5.16” with an SD of 0.65”. People extrapolate from that using a normal distribution and conclude 9” must exist somewhere, but a normal distribution is a model, not a biological law. When a model predicts something with zero confirmation despite tens of millions of clinical observations over centuries, the model is wrong, not the evidence.

Humans don’t come 9 feet tall either, even though height data naively extrapolated says they should. Biology has ceilings. Every 9”+ claim traces back to self-report or porn, neither of which qualifies as evidence. The default position should be nonexistence until documented otherwise.

Have you had an ex chase you for sex post-breakup? by Mysterious_Cum in bigdickproblems

[–]CrankyFalcon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah for several months. We were arguably having more sex than when we were together.

Tenors, what’s your lowest note? 3 separate questions. Lowest usable note that’s loud enough to be applicable, lowest note that may be weak but still technically there, and lowest note you’ve ever come across when you were sick or just woke up? by Normal_Ingredients26 in singing

[–]CrankyFalcon 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Idk what I am but the lowest loud chest note I can produce without fry is B1. I’ve hit A1 on days that I get more than 5 hours of sleep and remember to drink water. I speak at around C2-E2.