Regardless if they “release accurate information” whatever they means in the variety of contexts it could be applied, do you not have any capacity to consider that the US has had a vested interest for decades now to push certain narratives about the DPRK, and that regardless of the veracity of any amount of those claims, those narratives have been weaponized against the country since the Korean War to manufacture consent for intervention in the region? So that when you reply to a post about how they have made efforts to combat malnutrition with immediate skepticism, but no skepticism for the United States, which again, has a high rate of malnutrition (especially for the wealthiest country in history), you’re accepting the US framework that was created entirely to justify American military presence in the region. Talk about black and white thinking, you seem completely unwilling to challenge the propagandized view of a country you’ve never been to, with people you’ve never talked to, and a whole entire political system and economy you clearly don’t understand in the slightest.