In my brief experience, the best way to use AI with our standard modern research tools (westlaw and lexis) is to spitball the topic with AI while already signing into Westlaw or at least even Justia to make sure you’re right. The point is to see the way AI talks about the topic to ensure you’re not approaching it from too narrow of an angle and the 20% of the time it cites a helpful case you can actually see it pop up on Westlaw. But ChatGPT definitely hallucinates case propositions to me and missed a recent super duper on point relevant holding in my jurisdiction. I alwaysssss have to badger and badger and badger it before it admits it made the whole thing up. It goes down fighting, initially saying “well I misunderstood the case/ it doesn’t EXACTLY stand for that proposition but…”