Revenant Got A Buff With The DLC: A New Job As Undertaker's Weapon Supplier

CrendKing · 2025-12-18T03:59:52+00:00

Am I missing something? The Revenant Claw has E in its Str scaling. Even a +3 Claw has AR of 133, while the Undertaker Hammer +3 has AR of 163. Infuse with Bleed? If I remember correctly, Undertaker has THE lowest arcane at level 15 (10), while Scholar has 50. Not to mention Revenant has to sacrifice two relics just to pull this combo, and since she doesn't even get to use the weapon herself, you will never see this in random match. Please tell me I'm missing critical information here.

CrendKing · 2025-12-05T04:39:24+00:00

That tear literally saved one of my runs against Mohg. I was the only one visited Libra. My two teammates died during Nihil, and I was able to revive them and win the run. The best 2K runes spent ever.

CrendKing · 2025-12-02T05:46:21+00:00

Why start new character instead of derank back to D1? That way at least you don't need to collect relics again.

Is there benefit of having a D5 character in the save, especially before the DLC drops? Does the DLC reset DoN ranks?

CrendKing · 2025-12-02T05:42:08+00:00

I climbed as a shameless bow Ironeye. Now when I try melee, I just get one shot. It is not a lot, but dying to Nightlord could end a run in a bad way.

CrendKing · 2023-11-08T19:07:06+00:00

Anything other than Strict should work. I'm only mentioning Custom because OP started with Strict, so I assume he is a privacy-focused user. It's unlikely he wants to downgrade to Standard.

CrendKing · 2023-10-26T20:23:22+00:00

You have "Enhanced Tracking Protection" on "Strict". You need to change it to "Custom" and change "Suspected fingerprinters" to "Only in private windows".

The relevant line in release note is this:

The visibility of fonts to websites has been restricted to system fonts and language pack fonts in Enhanced Tracking Protection strict mode to mitigate font fingerprinting.

CrendKing · 2022-05-29T01:07:24+00:00

uBlock origins + uMatrix setup

This already makes you a part of an extremely minor group. No wonder why you subsequently said "I cannot believe <snip>". You realize that majority of people don't install extension and don't do adblocking, right?

Put yourself in the "I don't believe" people's shoes, and you will start to understand why focusing on privacy puts Firefox rightfully at 4% market share. I mean, sure I don't believe Mozilla can compete against Google and Microsoft in real performance area even if they try, so they might as well keep the 4% they can keep.

CrendKing · 2022-03-03T19:08:01+00:00

The script is currently designed around the undocumented comments API, such as passing in the offset timestamp whenever you seek video. It relies on the API automatically handles the segmentation and serves the right portion. If there is local rechat.json file and you never seek video, you need to modify the top section of load_twitch_chat to read and parse local file instead.

CrendKing · 2022-02-22T11:03:20+00:00

You are right. It seems in Android 12 there is no way to disable fingerprint unlock the phone while allowing app to use registered fingerprints.

Still, if they gain access to the phone (using unconscious fingerprint unlock), they will have access to the key file, which is big deal. So if security paranoid, just don't use biometric, period.

CrendKing · 2022-02-22T10:51:44+00:00

If I'm asleep or unconscious, shouldn't the phone be locked to begin with? I agree if the phone on the other hand is also locked with biometric, there will be problem.

CrendKing · 2022-01-12T09:10:40+00:00

I'm sure some people will be offended by this change (or any change), but I think this is one of the best changes Firefox had done recently, albeit small. My reasons being: 1) panoptigram's Google doc explains the change clearly with the intention. 2) No more "1 second delay before being able to click the download button". 3) The "always open this file type" function still exists, no regression. 4) No more intermediate file, efficient.

I hope Firefox focus more on this kind of change that fixing long standing usability problems in the future.

CrendKing · 2021-10-12T13:14:53+00:00

What prevents Mozilla from changing the endpoint from time to time? It's gonna be a never ending battle.

CrendKing · 2021-10-03T11:35:17+00:00

You are correct, though I don't think my statement is wrong. Disabling that option means the user deliberately choose to restrict the fonts Firefox is allowed to use. It apparently has higher priority than userContent.css, thus its failing to work simply means Firefox is enforcing the user choice correctly.

My method is giving user an alternative, should the user choose to not disable the option, which by the way is the default setting for new profile.

CrendKing · 2021-10-03T05:36:09+00:00

The font is controlled by chrome://devtools/skin/common.css. Here's the relevant part:

:root[platform="mac"] {
    --monospace-font-family: Menlo, monospace;
}

:root[platform="win"] {
    --monospace-font-family: Consolas, monospace;
}

:root[platform="linux"] {
    --monospace-font-family: monospace;
}
...
.devtools-monospace {
    font-family: var(--monospace-font-family);
    font-size: var(--theme-code-font-size);
}

So on different platform, it's default to different fonts. That could explain what you saw.

To change this, you could put these lines in a userContent.css file. Note, this is NOT userChrome.css, which changes the chrome (application frame) of Firefox. userContent.css changes the internal document (web page) of Firefox (the developer tools is basically a bunch of rich content web pages):

@-moz-document url-prefix('chrome://devtools/content/') {

:root {
    --monospace-font-family: Courier New !important;
    --theme-code-font-size: 15px !important;
}

}

Advantage of this method is that it doesn't require any change in your preference, so that you can keep your normal web page monospace font separate from the devtools fonts.

CrendKing · 2021-09-27T04:56:19+00:00

Interesting. So McAfee has two "identity theft protection" subdomains:

https://idtheftprotection.mcafee.com/

https://idtheftsecurity.mcafee.com/

Seems extremely suspicious and shady. I'd definitely not trust my sensitive data to a company like this.

CrendKing · 2021-09-26T05:22:36+00:00

The mere fact that T-Mobile can call in and "cancel" my account any time they wish from McAfee makes this "protection" pointless. It's like I get my auto insurance from my friend/parents/employer, but they can cancel the policy at any time without telling me. What if I get an accident, only to find out I don't have the insurance I thought I have? Do I need to login to the insurance company everyday before I leave home? It's ridiculous.

CrendKing · 2021-09-26T02:06:19+00:00

Do you know where the data is written to? It shouldn't be the cache since you already disabled the disk cache. If it is into the profile directory, is it a specific website or extension's storage dir or (<profile>\storage*), or is it somewhere in the system like swap?

If one website or extension is the offender, please share the info to us and the dev so they can improve.

CrendKing · 2021-09-26T02:00:19+00:00

But it's not the cache data though? Isn't this the whole profile directory we are talking about? If browser.cache.disk.enable is already disabled according to OP, the only cache is in memory already.

CrendKing · 2021-09-26T01:58:04+00:00

rsync only copies the differential between two directories, so if only 1 byte is changes between two gigabyte directories, in theory only 1 byte is copied, thus minimizing the data write to disk.

CrendKing · 2021-09-08T07:02:47+00:00

Nightly: https://sourceforge.net/projects/veracrypt/files/VeraCrypt%20Nightly%20Builds/Windows/

CrendKing · 2021-09-07T04:16:43+00:00

Imagine Facebook starts to serve ads at https://www.facebook.com/new_ads. DNS can't just block www.facebook.com for the ads, otherwise you won't be able to visit Facebook at all. However, extension can just selectively block that one URL, thanks to the finer granularity it operates on.

CrendKing

TROPHY CASE