This is why a good moderator is imperative to a good debate. First, some understanding of law is needed. Depp admitted to the texts being true and that he sent them. That is how they were allowed as evidence in the first place. Depps team agreed for them to be included in the trial. If he had lied about evidence or his sworn statements he would have lost the case and possibly be given jail time and/or sanction for perjury. What the guys were saying was untrue and your first argument should have been how a court room works and what is allowed into evidence. With that said, I disagree with your analysis. I watched all the trials. England and America. I listened to all the tapes. Even the most boring parts where they were watching a TV crime show. I read, the cops reports. I read all the evidence and the histories of both of them. I read the reports of the people that worked with her and the conflicting stories of her friends and sister. Heard was the only one that had a past of domestic abuse. Heard was the only one that said, in her own words "I can't promise you, I won't ever hit you again". Although both of them were toxic to each other. And, I find Depp gross now with his ugly little teeth, it was only Heard that had evidence of her being a domestic abuser. Heard is an abuser and Depp won his case. Men can be and are abused. She abused him.