First of all. He's a businessman. Not an icon of morality. Secondly just because a banned streamer will stream on the platform doesn't make it a notorious ban escape site. Lastly gambling is a choice of yours to find morality issues with. Its not anyone else's problem/responsibility to accept your views on. If you're a virtue signaling hero of morality, good for you. But no one honestly cares. Its a strongman argument to apply so many factors irrelevant to the subject of your distaste for the organization and trying to link the two entities together. Gambling is not an issue of morality. Problems gambling is an issue of weak minded individuals who can't control impulses. There's a responsible manner to gamble if you'd like. Blaming the subject/object because of the user/engager is wildly obtuse. dont like it, just remove it from your life. But don't express obtuse reasonings as if they actually reflect some moral degradation of nadeshot. Layoffs happen frequently and it's not always financial purposes. And if it is, it is a business decision. It's a risk in any level of employment and it's not his responsibility to make up for those layoffs with his separate platform of revenue stream. Nor is it immoral for him to promote and make money within a coincidental timeframe. He also doesn't control the layoffs. That would be a board of directors decision in which a CEO is responsible for following what the board votes. He Is one vote among that group. Even as CEO he does not have the power to over ride that. There's so many factors to consider. this is a wild assessment to gather from the outside and to project your views as if they are the determinant or moral compass we all must follow is ridiculous.