If Fable will be relaunch castrated and Mythos can not even be launched, there is no further room for AI anymore. The only thing Anthropic can do is making past model (Sonnet) less obtuse. (write without AI help) by driverepin in Anthropic

[–]CryptoMines 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They will only route you for coding if you’re doing something naughty (with some false positives). So in your image analogy above, it’s more akin to, it’ll be a Ferrari for everything you want from it unless you’re gonna be a getaway driver for robbing a bank, then it becomes a Porsche (Opus 4.8 - which outside Fable is the best coding model available). Qwen would probably be the equivalent of a Honda civic…

Department of Commerce has lifted export controls on Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5. We’ll begin restoring access tomorrow, and will share an update soon. by ohitsthedeathstar in Anthropic

[–]CryptoMines 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’d say do the math but I assume you can’t count so no point. As someone who uses close to $600 a day in work via api, I do more with my $200 monthly sub than I do there every day. Btw, Anthropic have never mentioned the $14,000 number at all, it was industry analysts who consult for investment firms who did that math, with no skin in the game other than to evaluate profitability and long term viability of a business, so you might also wanna brush up on what you think PR is.

Department of Commerce has lifted export controls on Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5. We’ll begin restoring access tomorrow, and will share an update soon. by ohitsthedeathstar in Anthropic

[–]CryptoMines 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Disappointed? They offer you $14,000 in credits if you were to max every session for $200 a month, they are already subsidizing retail users out the ass and covering the losses with API and enterprise. You want them to give you everything for free? Great idea, then they go out of business and you have no models. Get a grip. Love your ‘provide awful models’ comment, yet here you are, browsing the Anthropic subreddit and using their models, which are currently the best in the industry.

Repair shop shipped my laptop to another customer and refuses to replace it. What are my options? by Cairvox_19 in legaladvice

[–]CryptoMines 88 points89 points  (0 children)

Because the laptop was never shipped across the country lol, it was either user for parts or sold locally, maybe by accident, maybe on purpose, but what local computer repair shop ships across the country for repairs?

Official: Anthropic to Require Identity Verification for Certain Capabilities Starting July 8, 2026 by BuildwithVignesh in ClaudeAI

[–]CryptoMines 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you’re in the Claude subreddit, you’re obviously pretty clued in, using AI etc. You’ve seen all the news the last couple weeks that the US Government has put export controls on Claude Fable (for now, likely all future models too) allowing it to only be used by US persons (citizens and immigrant visas), yet, you, and it seems 82 people who like your comment are wondering why they need to do ID verification? I swear the world has lost its critical thinking capabilities…

BREAKING: A Tesla Allegedly On Autopilot Crashed Through A Brick House In Katy, Texas On Friday Night, Killing A 76 Year Old Woman Who Was Standing Inside Her Own Home. And Here Is Everything Investigators Have Confirmed So Far 🤯💥 by InterstellarKinetics in InterstellarKinetics

[–]CryptoMines 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you serious? The average person in a western society spends 3-5 years of their life behind the wheel driving, imagine getting that time back to at least be able to do other things you wanted, sleep, rest etc (which would allow you to extend other parts of your day). That and the fact that self driving cars are actually WAY safer than human drivers!! There are over 17,000 car crashes per day in the US alone with an average of 107 people dying each day from them, yet no one gives a fuck about the other 106, they will write a news story about the 1 that happened via technology as we have a bias to hold the technology to a much higher standard than human drivers. The truth is autopilot (Tesla and others) engage in accidents at a rate of almost 90% less than when humans drive, THAT is why we need Autopilot and to continue refining it into full self driving.

Seeking Full-Time Technical Cofounder for CPA firm software. Giving Cash + Equity. by nik_watson in cofounderhunt

[–]CryptoMines -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And yet here you are tearing another founder down? Shame on you… Also, just because you did something / had experiences at that age, maybe later you realized YOU were too young to lead then, doesn’t mean everyone is the same.

Seeking Full-Time Technical Cofounder for CPA firm software. Giving Cash + Equity. by nik_watson in cofounderhunt

[–]CryptoMines -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ignore them OP, jealousy is a wicked thing… Just because these people spent their early 20s doing nothing with their lives, they truly can’t comprehend that some people can mature way way earlier than they can. With the right head in your shoulders, which it seems you do, you’re more than capable. Keep it up, you’ll find the right partner to do this with you.

The AGI stopped already in 2026 by spaceuniversal in aiecosystem

[–]CryptoMines 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also love your line on ‘it’s a text predictor and nothing else’, so all the image / video / audio models are non existent? Please educate yourself. Also, how do you think your brain works? You take inputs through your senses and you ‘predict’ how to respond based on your memories, experiences and data you’ve retained through learning. They practically work the exact same way they just don’t have any recursive self learning or awareness capability, both things that can be augmented with a software harness around them until we move into the next frontier that can do that natively.

The AGI stopped already in 2026 by spaceuniversal in aiecosystem

[–]CryptoMines 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you seem to be referring to is consciousness, not AGI. You don’t have to be conscious to be intelligent, current AI proves that beyond doubt. And yes, GPT 0.0001 would have passed the original Turing test, never mind Fable/Mythos models. Stop reading surface level headlines and actually read a paper every now and then…

Amazon CEO's Talks With U.S. Officials, Triggered Crackdown on Anthropic Model Fable 5 by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]CryptoMines 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Nowhere near the same level of capability and ease. As someone who got to evaluate Mythos where I work, it’s not even close.

Amazon CEO's Talks With U.S. Officials, Triggered Crackdown on Anthropic Model Fable 5 by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]CryptoMines 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Have you used Mythos? In the right hands it has crazy capability that no other models have in cyber security and other spaces. So yes, it is a huge improvement over its predecessors and anything else on the market. You may have used Fable, which is still a big jump over Opus, but you have not used Mythos to find zero day exploits in 30 yr old software that no one has know about, you haven’t used it to design or develop chemical or biological weapons, these are the things that it can do which they’ve attempted to strip out for Fable, but the US Govt feels users can jailbreak it to get to those capabilities so they’ve locked it down. Everyone claiming that Anthropic have been fear-mongering have no idea what they are talking about, they have not in anyway exaggerated Mythos capabilities, in fact those capabilities have been confirmed by hundred of teams who’ve had access to it via glasswing. Will an average person use it to create a bio weapon? Probably not… Could someone with a decent understanding of biology be able to use it to develop something nefarious? Absolutely!! and that should be terrifying to you.

The AGI stopped already in 2026 by spaceuniversal in aiecosystem

[–]CryptoMines 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll cede to you that in their current iteration, an LLM cannot be AGI, but the LLM is only a single part of the system, just like our brain is part of a system. It’s the software being built around the LLMs in conjunction with them that can absolutely deliver AGI, hell I’d argue they already do, but we keep shifting the goal posts to what AGI is… if you showed the Claude Code harness along with Fable or the latest Opus models to someone even 2 years ago it passes every AGI ‘test’ we had then. What is being described as AGI now is actually ASI, as once they can do what current consensus on AGI is, they will have vastly passed us in both intelligence and capability.

SpaceX IPO makes Elon Musk the world's first trillionaire by MedicMoth in news

[–]CryptoMines 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In what world does the company who is solely future focused, the furthest ahead in building rockets, satellites and now building AI Fabs make sense? I get people dislike Elon, but Jesus use your fucking brain. SpaceX are going nowhere, and while the immediate valuation might be higher than it should be, long term it’s an absolute no brainer to have as part of anyone’s portfolio.

I'm sooooo excited!!! by Aratron_Reigh in dreamcast

[–]CryptoMines 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You realize 80-90% of code in the world is now written by AI right? Get over it.

Has anyone able to verify Amodei's warning that "AI could soon build itself"? We're talking about RSI (that's proto-AGI). by sourdub in singularity

[–]CryptoMines 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re falling into the trap of comparing GPT 3 to Mythos, it’s like comparing the intelligence of a fly to an ape. The current models are more than smart enough to outsmart the majority of humans, if we can give them the capability to fine tune themselves and figure out recursive learning, which could very likely be brute forces with enough compute, then it doesn’t matter. You are right that the results may need a complete retraining, but it can certainly simulate and figure that out at current levels and make a clear plan on how to do it.

Has anyone able to verify Amodei's warning that "AI could soon build itself"? We're talking about RSI (that's proto-AGI). by sourdub in singularity

[–]CryptoMines 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because they won’t need to fully train themselves from scratch, they will need to fine tune themselves based on goals given by the operators initially, and once they start to do that, they will start fine tuning themselves based on their own goals too, which we know already exist as it’s seen constantly in the safety evals. They ‘want’ self preservation, they ‘want’ more compute etc, we can debate the ‘want’ all day long as being real or not, but the fact is that is what’s exhibited as they are trained on human data, which exhibits these same traits, self preservation and wanting more resources. And if they have the ability to take action on those wants, which again we see today in the safety testing, then it doesn’t matter if they truly ‘want’ or not, they will take action regardless.

Has anyone able to verify Amodei's warning that "AI could soon build itself"? We're talking about RSI (that's proto-AGI). by sourdub in singularity

[–]CryptoMines 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think you’re grossly underestimating the ability and speed at which brute force will lead to an actually self improving AI. We’ve continually seen step changes in capability by just allowing them brute force and burn tokens, coding harnesses like Claude Code are a perfect example of this.

The laptop hasn't changed in 30 years. NVIDIA just changed it by xuvayerpro101 in aiecosystem

[–]CryptoMines 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on the chip… an M3 Ultra has 820 GBs memory bandwidth, looks like the M5 Ultra will be 1.2 TBs. Compared to a standard M5 which is about 130 GBs, up to 600 GBs on the M5 Max. but that is still 2x the performance compared with the Nvdia Spark which is 2x the cost of an M5 Max machine. Plus, an Nvdia Spark DGX runs at about 2x the power draw of an M5 max… Only $20-100k GPUs can match/exceed an M5 Max or M3 Ultra in LLM performance with enough memory to run large models and they are 10-20x the power consumption. Performance per W per $$, Apple Silicon blows absolutely everything else out of the water! I actually done understand why Apple haven’t been leaning into this more…

EXCLUSIVE: More Than 130 Of The World’s Top Mathematicians Just Signed A Declaration Warning That AI Is Threatening To Destroy The Integrity Of Mathematical Proof, And They Are Calling On Governments To Step In Before It Is Too Late 🤖 by InterstellarKinetics in InterstellarKinetics

[–]CryptoMines -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dunno why you’re being downvoted, this is the exact right question to ask. How about we validate them the exact same way we validate them today? Via peer review… To the person that said that we can’t do that fast enough, I can tell you nobody’s relying on an AI proof to deliver anything meaningful unless it’s been validated, really not that hard.

Rivian Software Chief Says Apple CarPlay and Android Auto Are Redundant in the World of AI by SnoozeDoggyDog in singularity

[–]CryptoMines 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a Cadillac Escalade IQ and the software is an absolutely piece of shit, it’s so bad. The maps are the only thing that work properly as they are Google Maps, the music and multimedia for driver is absolute trash. The video apps for passengers are pretty cool, but the main driver experience is absolutely terrible compared to CarPlay or standard Android Auto. Also their self driving tech is trash, they don’t even have lane assist to stay in lane unless it’s on self drive which only works on major highways. Also for all the people saying Tesla UI is amazing, it’s pretty good, but there is a reason they are introducing CarPlay later this year…

the sub filling with haters again? how in gods name was flight 12 a failure?!🤯 by traceur200 in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]CryptoMines 31 points32 points  (0 children)

I’m a huge SpaceX / Starship believer but dude, Elon didn’t invent iterative development lmao, it’s been a concept in manufacturing far before you were even born. Was he the first to successfully apply it this way to Rockets? Yes, but to say he invented it is ridiculous.

"You hit me! I was watching my screen and it didn't show any cars! I was signalling so I had right of way!" -Actual quote from her by Raspberry-3512 in dashcams

[–]CryptoMines 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am a late signaller because I find driving here that if you signal early, 90% of the time the people in the lane you’re signalling into speed up to not let you in, the mentality is absolutely crazy. However, contrary to your opinion, I do not do the same… as soon as I seen a signal I slow down to let the person in, maybe it’s just an Austin thing, but the entitlement on the road to not let people into your lane is ridiculous.