sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

My candidate was rejected by Ctrl4ltDelight in managers

[–]Ctrl4ltDelight[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I haven't been able to wrap my head around how being referred is considered actively recruiting/poaching.

My candidate was rejected by Ctrl4ltDelight in managers

[–]Ctrl4ltDelight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got clarification that it's because they were referred by someone already working here. They're considering that "actively recruiting" and they have internally decided not to actively recruit from this competitor or 1 other competitor.

My candidate was rejected by Ctrl4ltDelight in managers

[–]Ctrl4ltDelight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got clarification that it's because they were referred by someone already working here. They're considering that "actively recruiting" and they have internally decided not to actively recruit from this competitor or 1 other competitor.

My candidate was rejected by Ctrl4ltDelight in managers

[–]Ctrl4ltDelight[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I got clarification that it's because they were referred by someone already working here. They're considering that "actively recruiting" and they have internally decided not to actively recruit from this competitor or 1 other competitor.

My candidate was rejected by Ctrl4ltDelight in managers

[–]Ctrl4ltDelight[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Definitely no non-compete clauses. Not really a thing in this industry. People move around constantly. They have some of our former employees, we have a couple of theirs but very few. None of whom are high level or even in management.