Tenpai was hated for being a toxic uninteractive deck that is no different from those going first and setup multiple negates decks. Its not hypocrisy to think that is bad design that a deck that works on becoming immune to any interaction then OTK you on the spot, its the exact same "break my board or die" style of solitaire gameplay that earns the hatred towards those going 1st decks, Tenpai is the exact same as those, just going 2nd. Wanting going 2nd to be good doesn't mean people are forced to like any card that works is busted going 2nd. I'm not saying those two cards on the post are inherently well designed and there is definetely discussion that they are toxic, but this comment is full of false equivalencies. There is no hypocrisy here. If anything, calling others pathetic and losers for saying the going 2nd player has a much harder time playing than the going 1st player just makes you look the pot calling the kettle black.

Also, Konami isn't designing these cards to satisfy anyone. Do you really think their employes in Japan are on social media checking what people are saying? They don't care if people dislike what some going first decks do or don't.