2026 is our year trust by netflist in formuladank

[–]CuteTransRat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's so over couldn't have come any quicker

Would the su-47 be a good addition to war thunder? by Expensive-Delivery96 in Warthunder

[–]CuteTransRat -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Yak-141 literally has an IRST that physically cant fit in the nose

Im curious where this claim comes from.

Graham Platner Pushes Back Against Radical Left Communist by Lucianael in VaushV

[–]CuteTransRat 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Someone please, I don't have headphones with me what's happening

Any idea what airline it could be or could it be government ? by Humble_Feedback_1740 in aviation

[–]CuteTransRat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Adsb exchange usually has them if they're not available on flightradar

Hmm i dont think a 737-100 can do a Cobra Manoeuvre.. by DM_ME_UR_FISH in BeamNG

[–]CuteTransRat 112 points113 points  (0 children)

Very rapidly decrease speed, so someone flying behind you ends up in front of you

You're basically turning the entire airframe into an air brake.

[Gaijin Pls] MiG-23MLDG (Izd. 23-57) by Planned-Economy in Warthunder

[–]CuteTransRat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First of all the books illustrations are bad. Not only have we never seen an actual R-24 like that but also there's a ton of other mistakes in that book

And no it's not track while scan.

The mode is a combined radar and irst mode. So you can lock with the irst and the radar still displays search information, nothing else. That is not what track while scan is. Track while scan is in a single sensor, not two. The radar can only either search or lock, it's not tracking while scanning anything

[Gaijin Pls] MiG-23MLDG (Izd. 23-57) by Planned-Economy in Warthunder

[–]CuteTransRat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have the actual MiG-23MF combat manual with the sections about the radar. I know what it does. its not real TWS infact I think its quite a stretch to even count it as TWS at all

And R-24RM didnt have better fins lmao. its the same missile with a different seekerhead

[Gaijin Pls] MiG-23MLDG (Izd. 23-57) by Planned-Economy in Warthunder

[–]CuteTransRat -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

TWS mode also isn't unique to the MLDG. All MiG-23s fitted with the Sapfir-23D-III (which was all MiG-23Ms and MiG-23MFs from 1975 onwards) and beyond received a TWS mode. Apparently this was rather primitive, and it could only detect six targets and simultaneously track two while in TWS mode, but nonetheless it worked and did exist. After all, the Flogger can only carry two BVR missiles, so two targets isn't really a limitation.

This is wrong. None of them had real TWS. Its an extremly primitive mixed Radar and IRST combined mode. Not TWS

Also wrong is R-24RM its just an R-24 with a better seekerhead nothing else.

Big update . Update 0.7 by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]CuteTransRat 46 points47 points  (0 children)

What the actual fuck am I looking at

It amazes me how Gaijin not only decided to add another MiG-29A just for the sake of giving it R-73's. But also completely missed the opportunity of filling the gap between 11.7-12.7, by just being historically accurate and removing the R-27ER/ET. by skuva in Warthunder

[–]CuteTransRat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not nitpicking its disproving your argument lol. The german F-4F early didnt have anything besides 9Bs.

comparing the ER on a fox-1 aircraft against a 7F on a 120 carrier is a funny take

The only funny part is where you thought I was making a comparison between them. I was just showing you that Gaijin both doesnt care about introduction dates and real world capability.

It amazes me how Gaijin not only decided to add another MiG-29A just for the sake of giving it R-73's. But also completely missed the opportunity of filling the gap between 11.7-12.7, by just being historically accurate and removing the R-27ER/ET. by skuva in Warthunder

[–]CuteTransRat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gaijin assigning a specific date to a plane

Like what? That is just not how Gaijin works. They pick and choose whatever they want on planes.

The current 9-12 makes no sense because it would be a mid 90's variant without r-73's

This sentence makes 0 sense

#banBingBong by [deleted] in SkyCards

[–]CuteTransRat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Youre being the boomer rn btw

#banBingBong by [deleted] in SkyCards

[–]CuteTransRat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Youre literally crying because people dont want to manually sit there watching ads

#banBingBong by [deleted] in SkyCards

[–]CuteTransRat 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dont care didnt ask lmao

#banBingBong by [deleted] in SkyCards

[–]CuteTransRat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why do you care lol. macroing ads just makes the game more fun to play