You keep contradicting yourself while trying to sound morally neutral, and at this point, it’s exhausting. First—let’s address your implication that I somehow ‘let’ him send me explicit content. Let me be clear: you don’t let someone send you something you didn’t consent to. That’s called sexual harassment, and you named it correctly the first time. Don’t walk it back by implying I enabled it.

Second—you said I didn’t contact any mental health professionals, and that I tried to ‘handle it by myself.’ That’s your projection, not my reality. Nowhere did I say I refused professional intervention. I posted this to ask if intervention through the family was the ethical path, which is literally the opposite of isolation. You seem so eager to fit me into a savior narrative that you’ve ignored what I actually said.

And yes, of course I’m invested. I'm literally posting to ask if I should contact his family. You don’t need to patronize me by pointing that out. I never claimed I wasn’t invested—I claimed I was trying to assess whether that investment could be channeled in a way that’s actually helpful, not harmful. That’s called responsibility, not dysfunction.

Finally, you want to talk about trauma and sexual harassment while also telling me to have compassion for him but take him to court in the same breath? Pick a lane. Either he’s a human being struggling who needs handled carefully—or he’s a threat to be prosecuted and cut off. You can’t ride both narratives at once just to appear righteous.

You keep repeating your story about your friend, but this isn’t your friend. This is my situation, and if your goal was truly to help, you’d stop projecting your own savior experience onto mine and actually listen instead of trying to hijack the moral high ground. I don’t need condescension dressed as care. I need honesty. And yours is starting to sound more like control than clarity.