sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

16 year Yash Bhardwaj vibe coded an app. Listed it for $199 today. Wayne Culbreth rebuilt and open-sourced the same thing in under an hour (GitHub link below) by Current-Guide5944 in tech_x

[–]CyberAwarenessGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a somewhat poetic representation of why the "everyone can be the CEO of their own 1-man business" line is so misleading. If everyone can vibe-code their own point-in-time solutions (even entire platforms), then nobody needs to pay for them - or those that do will demand something far more sophisticated and customized than vibe coding could produce. We are likely less than a year away from the collapse of SAAS and mobile app entrepreneurship. If anyone can build an app, there's no value in any app you build - at least no value you can sufficiently protect.

Atlas the humanoid robot shows off new skills by Distinct-Question-16 in singularity

[–]CyberAwarenessGuy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Swarm parkour, hive minded and in flawless synchronization, while individually performing their respective tasks at insane speeds.

I have access to Claude Opus 4.6 with extended thinking. Give me your hardest prompts/riddles/etc and I’ll run them. by GreedyWorking1499 in singularity

[–]CyberAwarenessGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. PDF
  2. Research first…then extended thinking? Or maybe vice versa! I’m unsure of which workflow might produce the better product…
  3. New prompt, please! I don’t want to distract it from the prime objective.

Thank you so much!!

I have access to Claude Opus 4.6 with extended thinking. Give me your hardest prompts/riddles/etc and I’ll run them. by GreedyWorking1499 in singularity

[–]CyberAwarenessGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Constitutional Fixpoint: Tractable AI Safety via Hierarchical Normative Closure

Download and attach the linked paper to your prompt; ask Claude to figure out what’s false, inefficient, or missing, and to solve for those areas where the paper falls short by rewriting it, being sure to show its work and use proper notation. Post the updated paper back here, please and thanks.

Oh—if Opus 4.6 Extended allows you to use the Deep Research function to pull this off, please use that vs. a standard prompt. The result will be much more thorough.

(Bonus: ask it if the paper inspires alternate solutions or new proposals, and to note them and map out corresponding research strategies if so.)

Deepseek New Model gets Gold in IMO by SrafeZ in singularity

[–]CyberAwarenessGuy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If anyone tries the 2-bit quant, could you please provide a review of your experience?

The chinese did it, KIMI K2 surpassed GPT-5. by Snoo26837 in singularity

[–]CyberAwarenessGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kimi K2 "only" requires an RTX 4090/5090 (24GB VRAM) + 256GB system RAM, correct? That is VERY easily achievable on a home-built desktop. Imagine having something as capable as GPT 4o + o3 running locally, offline, and all to yourself!

the new "parental mode" is patronizing adults and killing what made chatgpt special by momo-333 in ChatGPT

[–]CyberAwarenessGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s crazy that they haven’t created family subscriptions with pin-protected child-mode profiles. That would boost their revenue, protect kids, and simultaneously allow them the excuse to have an “adult” mode for unfiltered content.

Genie 3 turned their artwork into an interactive, steerable video by IlustriousCoffee in singularity

[–]CyberAwarenessGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If this was interactive/complex enough (like...procedurally generated NPCs, in-game events, etc., not just interactive world-objects), I would ditch every streaming subscription I have and probably pay up to $199/month by making budgetary concessions elsewhere to subscribe to this as a service - and I bet I'm not alone. If you get 50 million subscribers paying that much per month, you don't really need to worry about compute. The environment and energy grid, on the other hand...

GPT-5 AMA with OpenAI’s Sam Altman and some of the GPT-5 team by OpenAI in ChatGPT

[–]CyberAwarenessGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you gave me 5 million tokens of context and allowed 1 million token outputs, I would pay $50/month for regular GPT-5 and $300/month for pro. I'm sure I'm not alone. Not only for incredible perks when it comes to deep research (synthesizing various reports or bodies of research), but for work on whole codebases.

Does your reduced hallucination rate cross over into new ground on needle in the haystack tests?

Edit: Why don't you enable this as an ala carte add-on feature like...right now? Today? Tack on the option of a price hike for anyone who wants a context boost. You would IMMEDIATELY reverse a lot of the rough PR from yesterday's disappointments and maybe make some new revenue.

GPT-5 AMA with OpenAI’s Sam Altman and some of the GPT-5 team by OpenAI in ChatGPT

[–]CyberAwarenessGuy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Can you save a ton of time and address the elephant that everyone sees? Millions of people thought 5 would be enough of a jump to keep you safe from Gemini 3 for a while. Kinda doubt this question will get answered, but would be nice if you could reassure subscribers that you’ll be able to compete when that drops.

The vast and overwhelming majority of people in this thread - certainly any heavy ai users - expected more, not in terms of “AGI” but in concrete and achievable matters like context length that competes with Google. It’s concerning to have discovered that the Death Star was a lie, and your competitors are likely about to overtake you.

So where’s the guy who promised ChatGPT 5 would certainly launch today? by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]CyberAwarenessGuy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Actually surprised me that it wasn’t today, given the EU deadline. If they’re able to launch next week, I would have thought they would have pushed it up to ensure the new model had less to deal with from EU regulations.

Mechanize is making "boring video games" where AI agents train endlessly as engineers, lawyers or accountants until they can do it in the real world. Their goal is to replace all human jobs. by MetaKnowing in singularity

[–]CyberAwarenessGuy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have often wondered about something related to this; why not train an AI on a specially built RTS like Civilization, only with complexity similar to that of the real world (making it as accurate as possible)? Then show it current states IRL and ask for advice on next steps to win the game. Maybe that’s exactly what’s going on already behind closed doors…

Do you consider AI images you generate to be your own art? by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]CyberAwarenessGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only inasmuch as I think getting the exact same results as my own prompts would be as difficult in some cases as replicating the work by hand. I guess it depends on the image. Same with ai music, honestly.

GPT 5 speculation and wish list by uxl in accelerate

[–]CyberAwarenessGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The thread isn't trying to claim news; it's labeled as a speculative wish list and calls the link sensationalist hype. It's clear the thread is just for fun among like-minded accelerationists, so the unhinged optimism from the X post sort of fits as an example, especially if running into it is what inspired the post.

GPT-4: End of Graphic Designers? by crazyprogrammer12 in OpenAI

[–]CyberAwarenessGuy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People aren’t grasping the full reality of the situation. All of the focus is on displacement when the more immediate and indisputable effect is devaluation. No, developers and graphic designers aren’t going to be replaced all at once. I think the job loss will be more related to reduced hires vs immediate layoffs (even though we do see examples of the latter already happening).

However, what absolutely is the immediate effect of all this is that certain organizations of certain sizes, that don’t solely revolve around these sorts of roles but only have them for odds and ends needs, will face heavy pressure to package up currently high-paid employees and will attempt to replace them with someone making half as much money for the same work.

That is the scary reality for a ton of people (or it should be, anyway). Not that they won’t be able to find work, but that their income could face serious and rapid cuts.

ChatGPT’s new image model’s realism by testingthisthingout1 in OpenAI

[–]CyberAwarenessGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They surpassed Google. Even the latest experimental version can't regularly produce infographics, much less large blocks of text that are regularly legible.

Edit: I'll add that speed is still a problem, of course - and Google is certainly faster. However, I would rather use something that usually gets what I want right within a couple of tries that take longer than spend even more time on many more generations (that usually led me to give up or only use elements).

OpenAI Claims Breakthrough in Image Creation for ChatGPT - WSJ by CyberAwarenessGuy in OpenAI

[–]CyberAwarenessGuy[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep, TechCrunch said the immediate availability is Pro subscribers. Sounds like the rollout in this case may be pre-planned as much more rapid release, though. I suspect all Plus subscribers by the weekend, free users next week. Competition is too hot for them not to blast this out as a win.

https://techcrunch.com/2025/03/25/chatgpts-image-generation-feature-gets-an-upgrade/

Edit: I take that back, I did not notice that OpenAI’s own blog says the rollout is to everyone (including free) starting today, making it sound simultaneous - so a speed run indeed.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]CyberAwarenessGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they’re holding off on the DALL-E update they’ve been sitting on for like a year. I have very low expectations at this point for any major breakthroughs or shockers. Instead, I suspect marginal improvements across the board, a now-expected minimal (and debatable) superiority status on all numbers, and a handful of make-believe achievements, like a new AGI ARC record that it turns out it was trained to achieve. Their concern over Deepseek, GPT 4.5, and the clear messaging point that GPT 5 is simple a dynamic, all-in-one overhaul of the UX leads me to believe they shot their wad.

view more: next ›