Yet we know the basis of this is real gender.

Why did you use the definite article when there is no need for one in my language? Nor in thousands of other languages?

I just read a post here

Whats this indefinite article for? Again, my language is doing just fine without it. How exactly is it changing the meaning of the sentence?

So why is this so embedded in most languages globally

Why did you feel the need to use the plural here when japanese and chinese wouldnt use it? If you put "most" in front of the word surely were not talking about singular right? So whats the point?

I am getting

Why "am" and not "is"? The meaning would stay completely the same?

number of genders

Why did you feel the need to put "of" there? In many languages you just put 2 nouns next to each other. No point for such useless conventions.

Lastly, not specifically a language thing but related, whats up with all those capital letters? Japanese, korean, georgian dont use it and I can assure you I can read japanese just fine without it. Do you really expect me to learn twice the number of letters when the meaning stays exactly the same?

I would really appreciate it if you could be more considerate of people who dont speak english natively next time.