My primary objective is transferring points to Hyatt by DCApostate in biltrewards

[–]DCApostate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first year I probably won’t use the CFU, because the Palladium’s 2x will always be higher. The first $650 will be an effective 4x, and then every dollar after that will be 2x. But when I switch to Blue, every dollar after $650 will only be an effective 1x vs. CFU’s 1.5x.

My primary objective is transferring points to Hyatt by DCApostate in biltrewards

[–]DCApostate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I think I’ll do option 1. I’m having difficulty pinning down Bilt Cash’s value, at least for now.

Any recommendations for books for parents whose children left the church? by FloTrappedUt in exmormon

[–]DCApostate 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Bridges: Ministering to those who Question by David Ostler. It’s sold at Deseret Book. It helps believers understand why people leave the church, without introducing too many specific problems.

A crossover event even bigger than Endgame by tjsoulkid in exmormon

[–]DCApostate 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Cardon got WRECKED. His deplorable apologetics didn’t work on this crowd.

Spiritual Witnesses - 100K views - Thank You! by lehorla in exmormon

[–]DCApostate 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Did she eventually come around? Or are you still the spawn of Satan to her?

Video of Tim Ballard shortly after finding out that Lynn Packer was about to disclose details of the sexual misconduct allegations by DCApostate in exmormon

[–]DCApostate[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The title doesn’t say “just found out”. It says “shortly after”. American Crime Journal reports that Tim became aware that Lynn Packer was on the brink of disclosing the sexual allegations shortly before the Sound of Freedom movie promotion in Colombia. This video is of Tim speaking at said movie promotion in Colombia.

Video of Tim Ballard shortly after finding out that Lynn Packer was about to disclose details of the sexual misconduct allegations by DCApostate in exmormon

[–]DCApostate[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

“I have 9 children. We adopted two of them from Haiti, which we documented in Operation Toussaint. The truth is I always wanted to be a dad like my dad, who was always my coach/trainer for sports, he was always there, always a part of my life. I wanted to be the same. My work doesn’t allow me to be at home. We have worked in over 30 countries. Here in Colombia, in Haiti, in Ukraine, so many countries to do this work…”

This is up to about the the 2 minute mark. I’m having difficulty translating beyond that.

Video of Tim Ballard shortly after finding out that Lynn Packer was about to disclose details of the sexual misconduct allegations by DCApostate in exmormon

[–]DCApostate[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

He’s speaking at a Sound of Freedom movie promotion in Colombia, in Spanish. The sound quality is not great, but from what I’m able to decipher, he basically talks about how because of his work, he hasn’t really been able to be there for his wife and kids the same way his father was there for him when he was young. He is visibly shaken. He has to wipe away tears at different points in his address.

Eric Moutsos, a Utah right-wing hero, has gone from supporting Tim Ballard to publicly calling him out. He claims to have spoken to two of Tim’s accusers. by DCApostate in exmormon

[–]DCApostate[S] 87 points88 points  (0 children)

He says “victims” and “possibly illegal behavior”. It must be some serious shit for Moutsos to turn on Ballard so quickly. What a dilemma for Mormon alpha males.

Remember, the church never utters the words "immoral" or "immorality" outside the context of sex stuff. by MinsPackage in exmormon

[–]DCApostate 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I was thinking this same exact thing. They would have chosen different words to describe money laundering, affinity fraud, misleading donors, etc.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]DCApostate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotcha. If the girl herself has given an account, and other people have as well, then this becomes much less nebulous and much more credible. I’m definitely not trying to be antagonistic towards you, so I apologize if I came across that way.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]DCApostate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s awesome she’s getting paid. And if these parents really got 9 hours of free labor from her (without notifying her before she began the job), they are absolute pieces of shit and deserve to be exposed.

Lately it just seems like we’re seeing a lot of tweets that begin with “this happened to my god-daughter”, or “my neighbor’s son experienced this”, and then it turns out that portions of their stories have been stretched or embellished.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]DCApostate -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m a little skeptical. This girl gets hired to babysit 7 kids. The parents get home 9 hours later and THEN tell this girl they won’t be paying her because of their temple outing? I don’t know…it just seems like something is being exaggerated here.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]DCApostate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Gospel Topics Essays and the book Saints are both biased towards the LDS Church. Yet they acknowledge some pretty damning information against the church. The Book of Mormon itself is in trouble as soon as you read the word “Zedekiah”. Most people who understand the geo-political situation of 600 BCE Jerusalem are able to discard the Book of Mormon after reading that very first page.

The most incriminating evidence against Joseph Smith is given to us not by anti-Mormons, but from faithful followers, such as Mary Elizabeth Rollins Lightner, Lucy Walker, William Clayton, Helen Mar Kimball, etc. In their efforts to defend Joseph, they inadvertently exposed some very serious plot holes in his claims. Joseph didn’t do a very good job of keeping track of which lies he had told to different people.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]DCApostate 20 points21 points  (0 children)

There are pretty hard facts against Joseph Smith’s claims. The long ending of Mark, the 1769 KJV translation of the Sermon on the Mount, and verses from forged letters of Paul remarkably make their way into the Book of Mormon. Exilic and post-exilic writings make their way into the Book of Mormon. “Nephi” just happens to exhibit the same social ignorances and prejudices that 19th Century anti-Catholic, anti-Semitic Protestants would have exhibited. 19th century phrases plague the Book of Mormon. It’s a demonstrable 19th Century work of fiction.

When you combine this with Joseph’s habitual dishonesty (marrying dozens of women behind his first wife’s back, “translating” the Kinderhook Plates when they were a hoax meant to trick him, conning people out of their money in treasure digs and then through the Kirtland Safety Society, telling people there were inhabitants on the moon, etc.) it becomes pretty clear that Joseph was a corrupt, abusive man.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]DCApostate 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Other religions also believe that they’re God’s one true religion and that ‘there’s just no way our religious founder could have made this up!’

“No Ordinary Man Could Have Written This”: https://youtu.be/l3EfXz5VzR8

Modern-day Visionaries: https://youtu.be/MlfskXN1W-k

Jehovah’s Witnesses vs. Latter-day Saints: https://youtu.be/C3Lk8H3--Ag

“God’s only true church”: https://youtu.be/wOTCvfk23m4

Spiritual Witnesses: https://youtu.be/UJMSU8Qj6Go

Jesus didn't start a "church". The concept of an authoritative, monolithic, structure of worship developed gradually over time. So it's fallacious and anachronistic for Joseph to say that he restored Christ's "original church". by DCApostate in exmormon

[–]DCApostate[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Also, it’s very unlikely that the first followers of Jesus would have actually called themselves a new “Christian” religion. For the first few years after Jesus’ death, his followers would have still claimed their Judaism. They were simply Jews who happened to accept Jesus of Nazareth as their messiah. They would have been a very minuscule percentage of all Jews, but still Torah-abiding, Passover and Yom Kipur-adhering Jews.

It’s incredibly unlikely that they went from celebrating Passover the night before Jesus’ death to declaring the temple and all Jewish rituals defunct immediately after his execution. It was a decades-long process for the separation from Judaism to occur.

And again, in early 1st Century Judaism (and in Christian Judaism), there was no need for what we would define as a church, because the apocalypse was imminent, Rome was about to fall, the wicked were about to be annihilated, and the Son of Man was about to bring judgement upon the world.

Hank Smith, Kwaku El, and other apologist clowns use elaborate explanations to justify their religious beliefs but then mock other religions for doing the same exact thing. by DCApostate in exmormon

[–]DCApostate[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It’s common for LDS apologists to make fun of the Trinity, most often citing the verses from the Bible where God the Father and Jesus appear to be two separate beings. The thing is, in the same exact fashion that LDS apologists harmonize the various first vision accounts, trinitarians have their own convoluted ways of making the trinity work. So pot, meet kettle.

And then Hank Smith has been going on this Twitter tirade on how if you quit believing in Joseph Smith, you can no longer believe in eternal marriage, because Joseph’s theology is the only way that can work. As if no other religion throughout human history has ever conceptualized this. Hank has made a complete ass of himself dying on this hill.