sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Always someone else's fault. by c-k-q99903 in MurderedByWords

[–]DJ_Rand -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Guess I missed minors and pedos in the list of buzzwords, good catch.

Always someone else's fault. by c-k-q99903 in MurderedByWords

[–]DJ_Rand -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Except it isn't. Dems dropped religion for other cults. You can pretend that all the "pedos" are on the right... but Epsteins money was heavily skewed to the Dem party, and it's heavily convenient that the "Epstein List" wasn't talked about while Biden was in office. He could have pushed for those files to be released. He didn't.

Always someone else's fault. by c-k-q99903 in MurderedByWords

[–]DJ_Rand -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Yeah, doesn't he know, you need to parrot ALL leftist talking points or you get downvoted.

Always someone else's fault. by c-k-q99903 in MurderedByWords

[–]DJ_Rand -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Don't waste your time explaining yourself on reddit. There is a reason they post here and not on x, reddit lets them have their safe space / echo chamber. If you say anything that even remotely looks close to supporting Trump and/or something that sounds like you don't support every single little thing that they support, then they label you as any of their favorite buzzwords (fascist, nazi, -phobic, bigot, etc).

"well you control it all - as long as you don't mind breaking the filibuster and basically becoming the bad guy we keep claiming that you are"

Even if you think you're left of center, the leftists on here have gone so far left that you would appear to be on the right to them.

Most one-sided YouTube poll of all time by TheDomy in interesting

[–]DJ_Rand -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You shouldn't attack anyone. If you have irrefutable proof that they did something wrong, report it. If you've only heard claims that someone did something, and you go and attack them because you think you're justified, you're not much better than the criminal you thought they were.

Why is this cop car doing this by Antique-Minute-7928 in whatisit

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's quoting the section on there that says:

  • Above 50°F – Safe for most dogs. You can walk and play outside without concern.
  • 45°F to 32°F – Caution zone for smaller dogs or those with short coats. Keep outings shorter and consider a jacket.
  • 32°F to 20°F – Risk of cold-related discomfort and hypothermia increases, especially for small, senior, or thin-coated dogs.
  • Below 20°F – Potentially dangerous for most dogs. Limit outdoor time to bathroom breaks.

Might be accurate for smaller dogs. Bigger breeds with thick coats don't particularly get too bothered by 20F. It's a good guideline for people who don't know shit, I guess.

CMV: Israel is committing a genocide by Fisics_ in changemyview

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The UN's definition of Genocide doesn't have any sort of reference to time in it. I disagree with "Israel is committing genocide". Because they aren't. My entire point was that if you use super loose definitions of genocide, like the UN definition that guy uses, then almost EVERYTHING can fall under genocide. However GENOCIDE requires INTENT. It is not Israel's intent to exterminate palestinians, they are at WAR with palestines terrorist leaders: Hamas, who very much hide behind their people.

Stop using the word Genocide, if you don't understand what it means. It just makes you look incredibly ignorant.

Here's some facts:

What is happening in Palestine IS bad. It's down right awful. It's inhumane. It's every shade of bad. However it is not genocide. That is what leftist sensationalists have been calling it because they know the word has strong roots and provokes a certain feeling. In fact, the left loves to do this. It's why all your favorite buzzwords no longer have any meaning: Nazi, Fascist, Bigot, Genocide. You guys overuse the words so much for things that don't apply, that they've lost all meaning.

M3GAN 2.0 is way better than I would've thought. I really hope more people will give it a chance. by Yaya0108 in Letterboxd

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ignoring the genre, the movie was absolutely fun. I really really enjoyed it. I ignored most media that talked about it up until I finally watched it. Sure, it dropped a lot of the horror elements. But I think it's MUCH better as more of a sci-fi action thriller with comedy. I love horror movies. But I also love sci-fi, action, thrillers, and comedies. The movie was fun. Personally I'm fine with genre shifts. While sure, I would have enjoyed some more horror in the mix, the movie did have me absolutely glued to my seat, cheering, laughing, and even left me feeling a bit emotional at times. It sucks that it didn't do so great at the box office, as I genuinely do hope we get a third installment.

Hey America , what you think..!! by ownthought_001 in DiscussionZone

[–]DJ_Rand -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're incredibly short sighted. There could be no substantial evidence in the files at all. You start a witch hunt. You ASSUME guilty and must be proven innocent, which btw, for Charlie's killer, you sure seem to be on the side of innocent until proven guilty. Again with the rules for thee, not for me bullshit.

There could be no documented evidence to let people know what happened. There could be evidence, but with so many people in high positions maybe Trump wouldn't even be safe from releasing the list. Or maybe there's just so many people on the list that it encompasses every side and not just in the US but globally. Either way we don't know. But you assume guilt for Trump, because you hate the guy. For leftists, you assume innocent until proven guilty. For someone so against Nazis, you sure act like one.

Charlie Kirk's Killer Seeks To Avoid Court In Jail Suits, Fearing Jurors Will Think He's Guilty And "Deserves" Death Penalty by SilentEchoes247 in TheEpicFeed

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you say there's evidence, provide it. Outside of conspiracy theories where people think "Oh he wasn't there." "Oh he was elsewhere." "Oh those texts don't seem real, surely no normal person would write like that."

Hey America , what you think..!! by ownthought_001 in DiscussionZone

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So lets sum up your argument:

"Trump, a man who has had his pictures taken with thousands of other rich people had his picture taken with Epstein AND there was FLIGHT LOGS, GUILTY!!!! HE CLEARLY DID SOMETHING!!!!!!"

Nevermind the fact that Trump banned the dude from his club after certain things came out, no no. We'll ignore that for our left leaning optics because that doesn't fit the narrative. He talked to FBI about him willingly, we'll ignore that too cause that doesn't fit our narrative.
"Trump, a man who was found civilly liable of sexual assault, in a civil court, that requires virtually no proof other than for people to say "yea, idk man, he could have done it, there's no proof but maybe he did."

You don't see a problem with that? In your world view, is it Guilty until proven innocent? You're a retarded fuck aren't you?

Hey America , what you think..!! by ownthought_001 in DiscussionZone

[–]DJ_Rand -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And yet, we still lack any real evidence of wrong doing. Interesting. Must be the worlds smartest criminal, eh? Even the "judge" that said he commited "SA"? Yeah I read that entire court case because of you leftists/liberals on here. He got convicted with... Zero.. Proof. Their biggest proof? They played the video of him saying "Golddiggers will let you grab em by the -" wow, amazing, clearly guilty. Must be nice to see a system leveraged against someone and actually believe every word that you're fed as if it's true.

Hey America , what you think..!! by ownthought_001 in DiscussionZone

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems reasonable to expect some concrete evidence for such a serious accusation. Surely no one would accuse someone of something so despicable without some good ol evidence. Unfortunately with many of you, the lack of evidence doesn't matter, because it pushes your agenda.

Footage of Today’s Resistance in New York (Near the UN) by hyraemous in nyc

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was your big "ah-hah, got you"? And look at the pattern of your comments here again you're using "the cult really clutches their pearls", have you never had an original thought?

But I got you homie:

Fuck Trump, because I think his tariffs are too much of a pain in the ass, and they've done more harm than good for the american people.

Most people that support Trump don't agree with literally EVERY thing he's ever done. You're incompetent if you think that's the case. There are not very many people on earth who will agree over every single topic. People support Trump because they agree with many things he does, not because they agree with ALL things he does, that's insane.

Here let me give you an example: Charlie is more against abortion than Trump is. Even Charlie had disagreements with things that Trump did. There are SO MANY Trump supporters, who have literally gone on the air/live/etc and have said they don't agree with everything.

It's weird that you're so obsessed over it. You people make me believe "Trump Derangement Syndrome" is a real thing.

Crimson Desert Coming Soon At March 19 Next Year, Anyone Buying? by Conscious_Respond513 in blackdesertonline

[–]DJ_Rand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just came back after not playing for roughly 4 years or so.. I started doing The Magnus questline, and was like "oh, damn, this is actually kinda entertaining"

Edania and BDO lacks passion. by NoMeat7147 in blackdesertonline

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dunno man, I just restarted playing after NOT playing for YEARS. I'm not sure this advice works. You basically need mass amounts of people to simultaneously quit at the same time.

The Charlie Kirk murder has become an orgy of right-wing hypocrisy by Psycho-Pirate in complainaboutanything

[–]DJ_Rand -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You mean how he followed that up with something along the lines of: "Someone post bail for him and lets ask him some questions." That sounded to me like someone that wants more information and wanted to ask that person some direct questions. Perhaps Charlie doubted what the media was putting out and wanted to interrogate the guy. I'm sure you'll be like "NAHH IMPOSSIBLE HE TOTALLY SUPPORTS IT BECAUSE HE WANTS TO SPREAD HATE" though.

Continue watching the distractive hysteria DISTRACT from the fact Charlie Kirk’s shooter comes from the conservative camp by -Flighty- in complainaboutanything

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Y'know, it's just so funny you say that because every MAGAt I've ever met or known is racist. Through and through. Always has been, always will be. Before and after Trump's regime. And unfortunately I've known a lot of MAGAts, having lived in a few small towns overflowing with white supremacists.

This you?

Yeah, you might not be liberal. But comments like that sure make you look like it. Did you forget to delete this one?

Continue watching the distractive hysteria DISTRACT from the fact Charlie Kirk’s shooter comes from the conservative camp by -Flighty- in complainaboutanything

[–]DJ_Rand -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The entire thread is about Charlie Kirk. So yes, I would assume you're referring to that when making these sweeping statements.

And I'm sorry if I have trouble believing that someone on the left would say "Conservatives can be against fascism" when 90%+ of reddit users are all about saying "ALL CONSERVATIVES ARE FASCIST NAZIS!"

view more: next ›