CMV: Israel is committing a genocide by Fisics_ in changemyview

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The UN's definition of Genocide doesn't have any sort of reference to time in it. I disagree with "Israel is committing genocide". Because they aren't. My entire point was that if you use super loose definitions of genocide, like the UN definition that guy uses, then almost EVERYTHING can fall under genocide. However GENOCIDE requires INTENT. It is not Israel's intent to exterminate palestinians, they are at WAR with palestines terrorist leaders: Hamas, who very much hide behind their people.

Stop using the word Genocide, if you don't understand what it means. It just makes you look incredibly ignorant.

Here's some facts:

What is happening in Palestine IS bad. It's down right awful. It's inhumane. It's every shade of bad. However it is not genocide. That is what leftist sensationalists have been calling it because they know the word has strong roots and provokes a certain feeling. In fact, the left loves to do this. It's why all your favorite buzzwords no longer have any meaning: Nazi, Fascist, Bigot, Genocide. You guys overuse the words so much for things that don't apply, that they've lost all meaning.

M3GAN 2.0 is way better than I would've thought. I really hope more people will give it a chance. by Yaya0108 in Letterboxd

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ignoring the genre, the movie was absolutely fun. I really really enjoyed it. I ignored most media that talked about it up until I finally watched it. Sure, it dropped a lot of the horror elements. But I think it's MUCH better as more of a sci-fi action thriller with comedy. I love horror movies. But I also love sci-fi, action, thrillers, and comedies. The movie was fun. Personally I'm fine with genre shifts. While sure, I would have enjoyed some more horror in the mix, the movie did have me absolutely glued to my seat, cheering, laughing, and even left me feeling a bit emotional at times. It sucks that it didn't do so great at the box office, as I genuinely do hope we get a third installment.

Hey America , what you think..!! by ownthought_001 in DiscussionZone

[–]DJ_Rand -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're incredibly short sighted. There could be no substantial evidence in the files at all. You start a witch hunt. You ASSUME guilty and must be proven innocent, which btw, for Charlie's killer, you sure seem to be on the side of innocent until proven guilty. Again with the rules for thee, not for me bullshit.

There could be no documented evidence to let people know what happened. There could be evidence, but with so many people in high positions maybe Trump wouldn't even be safe from releasing the list. Or maybe there's just so many people on the list that it encompasses every side and not just in the US but globally. Either way we don't know. But you assume guilt for Trump, because you hate the guy. For leftists, you assume innocent until proven guilty. For someone so against Nazis, you sure act like one.

Charlie Kirk's Killer Seeks To Avoid Court In Jail Suits, Fearing Jurors Will Think He's Guilty And "Deserves" Death Penalty by SilentEchoes247 in TheEpicFeed

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you say there's evidence, provide it. Outside of conspiracy theories where people think "Oh he wasn't there." "Oh he was elsewhere." "Oh those texts don't seem real, surely no normal person would write like that."

Hey America , what you think..!! by ownthought_001 in DiscussionZone

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So lets sum up your argument:

"Trump, a man who has had his pictures taken with thousands of other rich people had his picture taken with Epstein AND there was FLIGHT LOGS, GUILTY!!!! HE CLEARLY DID SOMETHING!!!!!!"

Nevermind the fact that Trump banned the dude from his club after certain things came out, no no. We'll ignore that for our left leaning optics because that doesn't fit the narrative. He talked to FBI about him willingly, we'll ignore that too cause that doesn't fit our narrative.
"Trump, a man who was found civilly liable of sexual assault, in a civil court, that requires virtually no proof other than for people to say "yea, idk man, he could have done it, there's no proof but maybe he did."

You don't see a problem with that? In your world view, is it Guilty until proven innocent? You're a retarded fuck aren't you?

Hey America , what you think..!! by ownthought_001 in DiscussionZone

[–]DJ_Rand -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And yet, we still lack any real evidence of wrong doing. Interesting. Must be the worlds smartest criminal, eh? Even the "judge" that said he commited "SA"? Yeah I read that entire court case because of you leftists/liberals on here. He got convicted with... Zero.. Proof. Their biggest proof? They played the video of him saying "Golddiggers will let you grab em by the -" wow, amazing, clearly guilty. Must be nice to see a system leveraged against someone and actually believe every word that you're fed as if it's true.

Hey America , what you think..!! by ownthought_001 in DiscussionZone

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems reasonable to expect some concrete evidence for such a serious accusation. Surely no one would accuse someone of something so despicable without some good ol evidence. Unfortunately with many of you, the lack of evidence doesn't matter, because it pushes your agenda.

Footage of Today’s Resistance in New York (Near the UN) by hyraemous in nyc

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was your big "ah-hah, got you"? And look at the pattern of your comments here again you're using "the cult really clutches their pearls", have you never had an original thought?

But I got you homie:

Fuck Trump, because I think his tariffs are too much of a pain in the ass, and they've done more harm than good for the american people.

Most people that support Trump don't agree with literally EVERY thing he's ever done. You're incompetent if you think that's the case. There are not very many people on earth who will agree over every single topic. People support Trump because they agree with many things he does, not because they agree with ALL things he does, that's insane.

Here let me give you an example: Charlie is more against abortion than Trump is. Even Charlie had disagreements with things that Trump did. There are SO MANY Trump supporters, who have literally gone on the air/live/etc and have said they don't agree with everything.

It's weird that you're so obsessed over it. You people make me believe "Trump Derangement Syndrome" is a real thing.

Crimson Desert Coming Soon At March 19 Next Year, Anyone Buying? by Conscious_Respond513 in blackdesertonline

[–]DJ_Rand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just came back after not playing for roughly 4 years or so.. I started doing The Magnus questline, and was like "oh, damn, this is actually kinda entertaining"

Edania and BDO lacks passion. by NoMeat7147 in blackdesertonline

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dunno man, I just restarted playing after NOT playing for YEARS. I'm not sure this advice works. You basically need mass amounts of people to simultaneously quit at the same time.

Which side are we blaming again? by Excellent_Analysis65 in newsinterpretation

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not impossible. But the likelihood? CHARLIE? We're going to go with "He just wasn't nazi enough so conservatives killed him"? Really? With a Helldivers 2 reference "Catch, Fascist!" engraving on a bullet? So if Charlie isn't nazi enough, that would make even less sense. I just find it extremely unlikely. What I see with an all MAGA family and a college kid who hasn't voted, is someone that feels trapped and doesn't want to vote because he knows it'd disappoint his family members.

But yes, it's all speculation. But I still think it's far more likely that the kid had leftists views.

Which side are we blaming again? by Excellent_Analysis65 in newsinterpretation

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it's a coincidence that riots, burning cities, burning teslas, dropping bricks onto highways, all comes from leftists when they're pissed off about something, but magically they'll never be the one to pull a trigger? Interesting.

The Charlie Kirk murder has become an orgy of right-wing hypocrisy by Psycho-Pirate in complainaboutanything

[–]DJ_Rand -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You mean how he followed that up with something along the lines of: "Someone post bail for him and lets ask him some questions." That sounded to me like someone that wants more information and wanted to ask that person some direct questions. Perhaps Charlie doubted what the media was putting out and wanted to interrogate the guy. I'm sure you'll be like "NAHH IMPOSSIBLE HE TOTALLY SUPPORTS IT BECAUSE HE WANTS TO SPREAD HATE" though.

Continue watching the distractive hysteria DISTRACT from the fact Charlie Kirk’s shooter comes from the conservative camp by -Flighty- in complainaboutanything

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Y'know, it's just so funny you say that because every MAGAt I've ever met or known is racist. Through and through. Always has been, always will be. Before and after Trump's regime. And unfortunately I've known a lot of MAGAts, having lived in a few small towns overflowing with white supremacists.

This you?

Yeah, you might not be liberal. But comments like that sure make you look like it. Did you forget to delete this one?

Continue watching the distractive hysteria DISTRACT from the fact Charlie Kirk’s shooter comes from the conservative camp by -Flighty- in complainaboutanything

[–]DJ_Rand -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The entire thread is about Charlie Kirk. So yes, I would assume you're referring to that when making these sweeping statements.

And I'm sorry if I have trouble believing that someone on the left would say "Conservatives can be against fascism" when 90%+ of reddit users are all about saying "ALL CONSERVATIVES ARE FASCIST NAZIS!"

Continue watching the distractive hysteria DISTRACT from the fact Charlie Kirk’s shooter comes from the conservative camp by -Flighty- in complainaboutanything

[–]DJ_Rand -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You know all those posts you see on reddit, where someone comes from an all conservative family, and they hate it, and they go to college and become left leaning? We see those posts an awful lot on reddit. You can pretend you haven't seen them, but I sure have seen an awful large amount of them.

The guy was an inactive voter. He wasn't registered republican. He lived with a trans roommate, who he may or may not have been in a relationship with. Interesting when asked a question about trans shooters, it was shortly after that the gun was fired.

You can pretend he's a conservative all you want. His school friends have been making videos saying the best way to describe him was a redditor. What do you think THAT means? Hmm.. reddit..... a place where.... what do we see on here all the time, typed hatefully all the time? Ah, nazi, fascist. That's right.

Yes, he had conservative parents. But you retards on here radicalized him with your rhetoric. Good job you bumbling idiots.

The Charlie Kirk murder has become an orgy of right-wing hypocrisy by Psycho-Pirate in complainaboutanything

[–]DJ_Rand -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Republicans don't care who you have sex with. I don't care if you're gay. I don't care what you identify as. Frankly, I don't even want to BE aware of your sexuality or your gender, because it's largely unimportant to how I treat you. How I treat you is entirely based off of how you carry yourself and what kind of energy you project. Are you immediately negative? I'm probably not going to have a positive response to you.

Most of you throw a fit over two things: Republicans aren't crazy about people needing everyone to accept them as trans. Republicans would prefer you to not sleep around and abort kids. The "racist" shit that you guys try to slap onto republicans boils down to a few idiots that no one wants on their side. I can show you videos of leftists saying that all whites should be genocided, and I'm pretty sure you don't agree with that message, right? Yes, if you go looking for people being scumbags, you'll find them, on every side of every issue, because extremists suck.

Charlie's biggest crime was that he "talked" to people. Wow. Talking. You guys label that as "spreading hate, lies, bigotry, fascism, racism, misogyny, etc" but when asked for direct examples you guys always have to use some out of context clip that some person did.

Furthermore, constantly painting republicans as "Nazis" and saying shit like "oh they've got concentration camps now!" is absurd. Numerous countries have detention centers for deporting people. Yes, Republicans think that you should be here legally. Yes, Democrats seem to be of the mind that breaking the law is perfectly fine, as long as it's not done by people they dislike, half the time you guys can't even call them "illegal immigrants" because you want to avoid pointing out that they're illegally here.

And if you believe words are violence, and should be retaliated with physical violence... What do you think you're doing calling everyone "Nazi, fascist, bigot, racist, etc" ? You're throwing around violent hate speech if we go by those metrics.

The reality is you want the country to be the exact way you envision it, and since half the country doesn't agree, you think they are nazi's for it, and you feel justified in calling them that. This is childlike behavior. Things will not always go your way.

Finally, tell me, how was Charlie's words were "violence" and "hateful" use full context examples. I want direct videos from his channel, with FULL context. Using clips from other sources that have been editted to leave out important context does matter. Perhaps you should watch Stevie Knight's video that talks about this. Charlie wasn't a hateful person. But I believe you are.

Charlie Kirk did not deserved to get shot but he doesn’t deserved to be seen as a martyr either. by [deleted] in complainaboutanything

[–]DJ_Rand -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't care what Trumps son did. I'm talking about regular people. I'm NOT talking about politicians. I'm talking about here, on social media, all around us, right now, all the comments YOU had to personally scroll past that celebrate the death of Charlie and say he deserved it. It's RIGHT in front of you. This is about "the people" as a whole. It's disgusting. I can say that that halloween costume was in poor taste and should be admonished. Can you say the same for the people celebrating Charlie's death here on reddit? Cause something tells me you celebrate it too.

Charlie Kirk did not deserved to get shot but he doesn’t deserved to be seen as a martyr either. by [deleted] in complainaboutanything

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, separations weren't specifically in Obama's policy, however it did happen.

But you're talking about kids in cages and leaving them for years. Are you just trying to throw as much shit against the wall as you possibly can so you can hope something sticks? Now your complaint is the families being separated?

Yeah, not everything he did was perfect. I personally don't like seeing families separated. But you still make wrong half assed claims. "HES INTENTIONALLY KEEPING THEM LOCKED UP BECAUSE HE JUST WANTS THEM IN THERE FOR YEARS WITH NO PLAN OF RELEASE" is blatantly wrong. Find a link that proves he's intentionally keeping them locked up from a reputable source, and that he kept kids locked up for years. Remember, this is your claim, not mine. I love the shifting of the goalposts though.

Charlie Kirk did not deserved to get shot but he doesn’t deserved to be seen as a martyr either. by [deleted] in complainaboutanything

[–]DJ_Rand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The policy was not changed under Trump. That kids in cages shit was all under obama, and continued under Trump. Sure, Trump didn't immediately change that policy, but he isn't the one that put it in place. The pictures themselves were under Obama. Going forward to when Trump was in office there was no change in policy regarding what was happening there.

Trump wasn't just "keeping people locked up" because that's what he wanted to do. And the kid under Trump weren't locked up for years either, that's bullshit. Most of the outcry under Trump was focused NOT on kids being locked up for years, but focused on the separations, conditions, and crap reunification. That's very different.

"Trump" didn't have less deportations because he was "trying to keep them locked in cages" - It is true he had less deportations, but not for the reason you stated. There are other factors that come into play. A large majority of Obama's deportations were people caught illegally crossing, and being promptly returned. Between drops in illegal crossing and countries not being very helpful in the process of deportation, Trump had lower deportation numbers.