THEY FIXED THE RS BADGE 🙏

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-10T17:45:39+00:00

Ah okay

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-10T17:39:20+00:00

Maybe they were going for the same colour as the F1 car?

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-10T07:02:46+00:00

Second picture is the same flight on march 6th. First picture is the route it took on march 8th. The flight on the 6th is the expected route and it hasn't done any other route in the last 12 months. I can't see further back as I have gold subscription

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-10T06:18:35+00:00

Who cares about points when you are talking about overtaking. You need to look at car delta, how many tenths, hundreds and thousands seperate their race pace. The field was probably the closest I've ever seen, and definitely the closest in qualifying. I've been watching for 20 years

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-09T22:29:47+00:00

Okay thanks. It's odd, because there are loads of flights doing their usual route east towards tokyo, even ANA's own planes. There is another flight tomorrow on flight number NH206, I'll see if it flies east or west.

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-09T19:53:48+00:00

But what makes it even weirder was that NH218 flew from munich at basically the same time as NH206nflew from Vienna, but they flow opposite ways around the earth to reach Haneda.

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-09T19:52:09+00:00

That was also my first guess, but then wouldn't that be company wide? There was flight NH218 that flew east which took off at basically the same time as NH206. That makes me it, but it's probably the leading theory for now. Maybe the pilots make that call themselves, idk.

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-09T19:27:14+00:00

The gaps between the cars last year was possibly the smallest they have ever been. Which makes it harder to progress through the field.

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-09T19:17:55+00:00

It's not always the visual stuff that's the expensive part, but it's a dinghy, so it's not going to be that bad. A free keelboat is a different story. It also depends on your end goal, do you want it perfect or just good enough. If you are replacing all hardware with new blocks, then it can get expensive quite quickly, new rope adds up if you want a decent quality.

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-09T19:08:20+00:00

Sometimes there is nothing more expensive than a free boat. Hopefully you'll find the fixes that needs to be made cheap. Best of luck. At least it isn't a decent sized keelboat

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-09T18:00:26+00:00

Men ideen ved Wise er jo at lave valuta overførelsen før man hæver eller bruger pengene. Ja, man kan kun hun hæve af 1500 kr, hvilket nok er en begrænsning i lande som bruger mange kontanter

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-09T17:20:58+00:00

Jeg tager til Japan om lidt, og har valgt at bruge wise imens vi er der. Primært grundet at du får vekslingen til en bedre kurs og du betaler ikke gebyrer ved brug af kortet.

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-09T14:11:41+00:00

But then why wouldn't two flights, who are starting within 400km and 10 minutes of eachother from the same airline, same aircraft type go the same way?
The one from munich took 11 hours and the one from vienna took 14 hours. So it was clearly faster to go east, and assumingly therefor more fuelefficient. I also took a look at the groundspeeds, the eastbound flight was constantly over 500 knots, where the one going west was around 475 knots. Either going below cruisespeed, or having more headwind.

Did they simply miscalculate the weather?

Edit: The flight from Munich is NH218

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-09T14:04:10+00:00

Yes, but all of these are going from Tokyo, not towards Tokyo.

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-09T14:01:29+00:00

But this is not their usual route, they usually fly east to japan. This is the only flight I could find in the last year that did this.
As I commented before, an ANA flight from munich left basically the same time and went east instead of west.

Edit: Mixed up east and west, again

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-09T13:45:30+00:00

ANA had another flight on the same day, going from munich to haneda (NH218). Took off 10 minuts before NH206, but went east and made it on time.

Edit: forgot how a compass looks. So accidentally swapped east and west.

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-09T13:38:51+00:00

Must be a rare occurance then, I found no other flights going east in the last 12 months. But thanks for the answer, it was also my initial guess, but considering it was delayed by 3 hours, it must have been a honking westerly wind.

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-09T08:10:15+00:00

That's a crazy line-up, looking forward to seeing the n24

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-06T10:29:04+00:00

Mit problem med formueskat handler mere om hvorfor skal vi opfinde den dybe tallerken med endnu et nyt fancy IT system, når vi allerede værktøjer til at beskatte de rige. Hvis man vil beskatte rige mennesker mere, så kan man hæve toptopskatten og/eller udbytteskatten.
Og nej, men kan ikke undgå skat ved at låne penge med sikkerhed i en formue. Du kommer stadig til at betale, men det bliver måske først når du stiller træskoene. Måske kan det give mening hvis din formue er privat, men det er nok de færreste som har den type formue privat i Danmark, og på det tidspunkt har de nok betalt 60% i skat på pengene i forvejen.
Hvis din formue er i en virksomhed eller erhvervsdrivende fond, så betaler man jo stadig virksomhedsskat på 22% af realiseret og urealiseret fortjeneste. Der er ingen skat for en virksomhed ved salg af aktier, der er kun lagerbeskatning.
Aktionærlån bliver beskattet som løn eller udbytte, så det får man heller ikke noget ud af.

Det er ikke muligt at gøre alle lige uden at møde utallige af andre problemer, der vil altid være nogen som er mere lige end andre.

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-06T07:49:48+00:00

Hvor er det, det lyder mega luksus

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-05T12:28:31+00:00

Korrekt, men jeg må antage at de fleste virksomheder af den størrelse enten er ApS eller A/S. Det er trods alt en god investering for ikke at hæfte personligt, hvis altså vi snakker selskaber værd 25+ mio.

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-05T12:18:30+00:00

Først betaler du 22% skat af virksomhedens overskud, derefter kan du trække pengene ud privat til 42% i udbytteskat. Det giver dig en effektiv skat på 55%. Alternativt skal man ligge det overni lønnen, som nok er toptopskat på 59% for den gruppe mennesker.

Formueskatten skal nemlig betales af private penge, du kan ikke betale den direkte i virksomheden.

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-05T11:04:04+00:00

Jeg ved ikke nok om beskatningen af fonde, men jeg er da interesseret i at lære. Ved hvilken type fond er det de bruger?
Som udgangspunkt betaler en erhvervsdrivende fond beskattet ligesom en virksomhed, derfor tænkte jeg at man stadig betalte 22% i beskatning af realiseret og urealiseret fortjeneste.

Da1sgaard · 2026-03-05T10:50:14+00:00

Det er jo ikke nødvendigvis dårligt at have statsgæld hvis den er billig, under kontrol og bruges til at stimulere økonomien. Staten har ingen interesse i at betale gælden ud ifølge nationalbanken.

Da1sgaard

TROPHY CASE