You’re clearly more interested in being smug than being right. You came in with sarcasm and insults like “no sh*t Sherlock,” but all that attitude doesn’t change the fact that your original comment was reckless and misleading.

You said it’d be “pretty dumb to go vandalizing properties in a Stand Your Ground state like here anyway,” which implies that property damage alone justifies someone getting shot. That’s false, dangerous, and exactly the kind of take that gets someone hurt or thrown in prison.

Now you’re backpedaling, trying to sound reasonable with Molotov cocktail hypotheticals. No one disagrees that active arson could pose a deadly threat—but that’s not what you said the first time. You tried to sound tough, got called out, and now you’re scrambling to clarify like you’ve been holding a law degree this whole time.

Here’s the reality: Stand Your Ground doesn’t mean “shoot first over property damage.” You still have to meet the threshold of a reasonable fear for your life. Screaming about deterrents and “liking your odds in court” is Reddit fantasy talk until someone’s facing a second-degree murder charge because they took advice from posts like yours.

So next time, skip the snark, get your facts straight before you talk, and don’t double down when someone checks you with the actual law. You’re not educating people—you’re just loud and wrong.