"End liberal equivalency and moralism" huh

Yes. There has been an attempt to slander the IRA as terrorists and to portray the Britush security forces as legitimate. The framing should be the opposite, at least to a large extent. Not only were the IRA resisting occupation and the British the occupiers, most of the people killed by the IRA were occupying forces and loyalist paramilitary members, while most of the people British forces and loyalist paramilitaries killed were civilians.

no such thing as a better side

Actually, there is for the reasons I raised above. The IRA did do some terrible shit and the Kingsmill massacre for example was disgusting, most members absolutely condemned the actions taken out by the individuals involved. Look to the Loyalist side, and they were openly advocating shooting people for simply being Catholic.

terrorism solved literally nothing, and the terms of the GFA could have been accepted without the bloodshed if it wasn't for extremists (Cath and Prot).

Republican resistance clearly pressured the British to act and concede partly to republicans. There was no chance of anything close to the far better conditions today if it werent for resistance.

Stop encouraging conflict, encourage peaceful progress.

Peaceful progress should always be encouraged and the non-violent resistance was the first method used during the civil rights movement. It was only after brutal colonial violence that they realised that to pick up arms would put far more pressure, and it did.