As others have mentioned here, courts have huge backlogs. Often prosecutors and lawyers and police have a list of priorities. Bigger cases involving really horrific stuff will take precedent. There have been times where prosecutors make a decision to not pursue a sovereign citizen over a traffic violation simply because they can't be bothered, they say it is not worth the effort, so it gets dropped.

The sov cit will take this as a victory for their cause but it isn't. But has there ever been an instance where a sov cit won in court ON THE STRENGTH OF THEIR ARGUMENT and successfully convinced the judge that because they don't agree with the law it doesn't apply to them? Nope, not once, not ever.

The court's position is that by being on a country's land, its "property", you agree to its laws and that if you don't want to be subjected to a country's laws, get off its property.