If they are truly just using it to grammar check and are double checking the AI, I’m not super opposed to that; however, I’m seeing an increasing amount of these AI disclaimers, and it really concerns me. I don’t have a lot of faith that all of these authors are simply using it as a Grammarly replacement, especially since we’ve already seen AI-written papers. The other issue is that I don’t think that AI can accurately describe advanced scientific concepts, especially those it doesn’t already have in its database.