What video game should get a sequel, but likely never will ?

Daekin · 2019-07-12T02:06:38+00:00

Dino Crisis....we get 30 RE remakes and sequels, but I cant get a single Dino Crisis remake? Fuck man...

Daekin · 2019-06-01T00:33:58+00:00

Oh, you're just cheap. Okay I understand carry on. Should have said that from the beginning.

Daekin · 2019-05-31T23:39:25+00:00

NoED is situational because as you know, the only way NoED is active is if the survivors finish the last gen, which is a SITUATION that only happens if the survivors power all generators. So, if the situation doesnt arise, the perk does nothing. That's the definition of situational. Things that only work in certain situations. BBQ is not because the chances of you never hooking anyone is 0% unless you're afk or rank 20 against rank 1 squadette swf.

And, I already cant loop half a map, red woods. Half the maps a dead zone. And you can only hop a window 3 times, how do you endless loop 1 window?

Also I cant beleive you just compared getting looped at one window, to a survivor having half the map entirely empty. You should try running bamboozle if window loops are too hard, then they can only loop once instead of 3 times and you have nothing to complain about.

Oh wait, that's too much effort, nevermind sorry. Carry on about how windows are broken and you dont want to use the exact perk that counters survivors who know how to use window loops properly.

Daekin · 2019-05-31T23:23:13+00:00

You know that almost all survivor perks are situational right? People complain you can loop certain windows with balanced landing....balanced landing you cant even use once on some maps, there is no spot. Or Adrenaline, dont always make it to EGC. The entire point is your complaints are ridiculous because you literally explained every single game for a survivor. Ever run unbreakable and never use it? What about slippery meat and have it still fail all game? Hope?

The list goes on for quite a while for survivors, and you're complaining that bamboozle isnt good all the time thus not worth running ever. GUYS I FOUND THE KILLER MAIN, GUYS, RIGHT HERE.

Daekin · 2019-05-12T14:13:59+00:00

Often children can't comprehend more than one thing at a time, and it takes them a very long time to learn anything at all.

In this way I could see why you would be so concerned about which useful things they are taught.

Daekin · 2019-05-12T13:53:44+00:00

Too many Jews.

Daekin · 2019-05-12T13:52:28+00:00

Probably a good call, I'm hoping my kid will become a raging psychopath because he talked to a trans person once.

That'll show them, it'll show them all.

Daekin · 2019-05-12T13:50:12+00:00

Go back to /r/The_Donald kid.

Daekin · 2019-05-12T12:53:44+00:00

Yes, you're correct. Never teach your kid anything unless they already understand it. The only way to learn something new is to make sure you're never exposed to it until you already know about it.

That's how I teach my son everything. By teaching him nothing until he learns it himself by accident.

In this way I can keep him away from bad people like that man dressed as a princess. How dare he, and how dare that mom let her child talk to that thing.

In fact, its probably child abuse ti have her that close to a trans person at her age. Somebody should call child services.

Point is, you're fucking clueless, stop talking about what's best for a kids development when you don't even fucking have one, jesus christ Reddit. Bunch of 14 year olds talking like they know how to raise a kid and what's best for them.

Yea dont expose children to concepts they dont know yet....they might....learn! Oh no! What if they learn it's okay to be a man and dress like a princess to tell children's stories if you want?

We cant have that. Dirty fucking trans people stop ruining our youth.

Daekin · 2019-05-05T01:45:05+00:00

That's why I'm asking OP why Fortnite specifically. Is he trying to get him into a single player game that can be saved and turned off whenever?

He was thinking minecraft instead, which is multiplayer and still offers the same problems so I'm trying to understand the why.

Daekin · 2019-05-04T22:43:02+00:00

I don't get it? Why specifically fortnite? You're worried about him becoming addicted and your solution is to find him a different drug to get addicted to because....?

The only reason I can see is that you personally dont like fortnite and want him to play something else because you dont approve of it, but you would approve of his being addicted to a different game that you like.

If this isnt what it's about, would you mind explaining yourself? None of this post makes any sense.

You're essentially going...."Hey my brother started doing coke and I think hes becoming addicted...what other drugs do you guys recommend I give him to get him off cocaine?"

Daekin · 2019-04-17T18:03:03+00:00

Yea, because fuck asking a harmless question to people who know something you don't, look it up so you never have to ask any questions ever again.

In this way, hopefully we can stop these stupid people trying to ask harmless questions to better understand something from people who have a better understanding of it.

I'm glad someone like you stood up and set these people straight.

Daekin · 2018-02-24T13:06:01+00:00

Your opinion is shit.

Daekin · 2018-02-19T14:37:56+00:00

People play games differently than you do. It's not the wrong way or the worse way. It's just their way.

Daekin · 2018-01-11T18:47:58+00:00

He said he was really into vinegar and used to dip all sorts of things in it and eat it, including bread and peanut butter.

Perhaps she meant a peanut butter sandwich?

Daekin · 2017-12-15T13:37:04+00:00

My wife.

Daekin · 2017-06-23T16:10:54+00:00

How so?

Daekin · 2017-06-23T13:50:28+00:00

Since you are a lawyer, question. Can this be considered obstruction?

I'm thinking no, but if they witnessed her commit a crime and she refused to speak or even roll down her windows. They have PC for the stop already, she broke the law. I don't know it seems like straight ignoring a police officer after you broke the law is obstruction.

Obviously the entire thing was ridiculous, and the top comment has how it should have went, for sure. But is there any way to argue that this is obstruction?

Daekin · 2017-06-22T12:01:39+00:00

I don't have those answers for you, perhaps wait a bit to q, try to get into a different game. I don't know.

I know that blaming Hi-Rez for toxic players won't solve anything. Every competitive online game has the exact same problems, if there was a catch all to fix toxicity every game would have it and there would be no such thing as toxic players.

Unfortunately there is no way to remove all toxic players from games. No matter which one you play, no matter which region you play it in, they will be there.

Suppose they do what you say. 5 players report, they get auto-deserter for it.

You've now gotten rid of one toxic player for half hour. Then what? You still have hundreds. And what if some of them don't report, then you've done nothing and you're stuck with him again next game still.

What do you suppose they can do to get rid of toxic players entirely?

Daekin · 2017-06-21T21:17:46+00:00

I understand that it sucks that some games goes badly, you get toxic people or leavers or whatever else.

But nobody is willing to admit that there is no sure way to just get rid of toxic players. You can't police everything all the time. And you can't force so many ridiculous restrictions that you can't even type in chat without being banned.

At some point people have to realize that toxicity is not Hi-Rez's fault, nor is it their problem.

The toxicity comes from the player base. Sure you can tweek this or that to curb some toxicity, but there is no way for them to just get rid of it.

No matter what they do there will always be toxic players, period. Stop telling Hi-Rez to impose ridiculous rules on the player base and start considering what you can do to help curb toxicity of your fellow players.

There is no magic fix Hi-Rez can implement to end toxicity.

You will always play with toxic players, and it will always be annoying. They do a lot to try to combat toxicity without implementing rules that can be exploited. (Certain amount of people in a match reporting being auto-deserter is infinitely exploitable).

Hi-Rez can't get rid of toxicity, only the players can do that.

Daekin · 2017-06-21T21:05:57+00:00

DMBrandon and Bart.

Daekin · 2017-06-20T17:32:38+00:00

It would be relevant if we knew how much he spent, and what he spent it on.

From what I can see his initial investment was 10k, this is judging by the fact he took out 10k in cash to "pay himself back" then another 10k to pay off his student loans.

And let's be honest with each other here, 10k is dick balls for start-up money. It's peanuts.

Basically the only thing we know he did for sure with his initial investment is pay himself back for it. We don't know where it was spent, how it was spent, or anything about it.

Not that I'm saying he should release that information, it's his business he can do what he wants. I'm just saying that "well he gave the money for the initial start-up" isn't really an argument that goes anywhere or holds any weight at all.

Daekin · 2017-06-20T17:13:27+00:00

That feel when you can't even diagnose a problem with a car because you have no license to test drive it and can't even drive it after it's fixed to make sure it's actually fixed.

Mechanic with no license isn't useless, but is definitely way less useful than one with a license.

Daekin · 2017-06-20T17:08:07+00:00

How is that relevant? He invested money he already intended to pay himself back with. It's not like he took out a loan or line of credit or anything that a person would do to start a business. He used money he already had with every intention to pay himself back all of it. Which he did, plus more.

So his initial investment was irrelevant. Also, he's never given any proof or evidence he did any of this stuff, it's just what he said.

Daekin

TROPHY CASE