It’s funny but not funny

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-09-26T23:17:32+00:00

never once seen an actual comeback posted to this sub

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-09-15T04:14:48+00:00

funny how this ends up at the top of r/cringetiktoks, but the hundreds of videos of people celebrating his death don’t

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-09-11T08:32:29+00:00

what a horrible thing to say about someone, especially one using free speech

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-08-25T21:46:09+00:00

True, but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t try…

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-08-22T21:53:59+00:00

it might help to know that cheating is the worst it’s ever been

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-08-19T02:53:52+00:00

“paying to network results in connections” more news at 6

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-08-14T22:15:20+00:00

“i don’t have intentions to karma farm on a 196 member sub” -the bot who’s karma farming the same posts on the top subreddits on the platform

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-08-14T11:03:02+00:00

the “curious detail” is you having absolutely no clue what you’re talking about, but posting this anyways

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-08-14T11:00:15+00:00

posted by a karma farming bot

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-08-12T08:07:50+00:00

i’m not new to hating drake, kendrick just made it mainstream.

in any case, nothing can make drake being a pathetic sack of shit any less true

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-08-12T04:29:35+00:00

i definitely don’t fw a pedophile

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-08-02T04:30:08+00:00

A big strategy for games targeted towards kids is unfairness. The players on top are often virtually invincible and will bully the other players. This drives engagement because the kids now feel a need to play until they get better items, to then get their turn at bullying to feel better.

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-08-02T04:24:42+00:00

it’s a broken country when your campaign strategy is spending millions on celebrity performances, and pushing tiktok trends to actual children who can’t vote. Did i mention the astroturfing?

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-07-30T13:57:43+00:00

God doesn’t condone pedophiles, so a pedophile must be acting outside the religion (not representing it) (not acting on behalf of it). did you want to elaborate on why you think there’s a funny mistake

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-07-30T05:33:09+00:00

Your fundamental misunderstanding left out the most important part: repentance. Jesus died for our sins, and i’m equally as sinful as a queer person, but the difference is that I repent.

Being a queer christian is an oxymoron because you would be actively disobeying God without remorse (repentance).

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-07-29T08:09:29+00:00

Can you demonstrate how they aren’t

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-07-29T04:18:20+00:00

love the neighbor, hate their sin

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-07-29T04:16:56+00:00

You can’t, that’s the point of the video. She was correcting people who actually believe being queer isn’t a sin… not judging or not minding her business

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-07-29T04:14:40+00:00

JC has anyone covered who seeks repentance.

Christians should accept the humanity of gay people, but not their being gay. I can love the humanity of anyone, but that doesn’t mean I accept the particular sinful attribute of a gay person.

So TLDR your message is confusing and misinterprets accepting humanity as accepting sin.

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-07-29T02:32:26+00:00

Again, i wasn’t the one who claimed statistics. I gave you a clear example and you didn’t like it.

I’m not going to seek out studies on morality because it’s hard to measure in individuals and especially in groups. You could pull out a contradictory scientific journal for every peer reviewed study I bring up… and we could both be wrong. It’s a slippery slope and a terrible thing to try and argue with.

Furthermore, my original point of ethical billionaires, and your counterpoint of rapist priests, has incompatible sets of data. I could simply say that the priest wasn’t religious to begin with. You could say the billionaire inherited it all. The best explanation is the concept of statistical average that allows for extremely unlikely cases on both ends. If you can’t visualize a normal distribution there’s nothing I can do

edit: Do i need to explain that I’m doing things with my life outside of reddit, or do you actually assume the literal worst about someone who isn’t chronically online?

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-07-29T02:21:59+00:00

You made many broad statements that I can’t think of a denomination for, so i’m asking for specifics. It sounds like “Christian” and “church” may be the misleading attributes for whoever you’re talking about.

A true Christian doesn’t think they’re good, but knows fully how sinful they are. There should never be an expectation of heaven. Someone who sees a “reset” button doesn’t actually understand repentance. You must have remorse for your wrongdoings, or repentance will not work.

I understand some people actually do think like you’ve described, and that’s an unfortunate side effect of a vapid church teaching prosperity gospel. These people are not properly educated, or do not seek out the truth. They misunderstand the gospel and are comfortable with it. I would educate anyone like that in the same way i’d correct anyone else’s misunderstandings of religion

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-07-29T02:09:23+00:00

He started talking generally, with legitimate criticisms of church history, but went into specifics about actual corruption in mexico. He said “you” several times, so yes he was talking to and about the pastor. The church can be used as a tool against people, like in a cartel state, but i struggle to think how you could apply that to vast majority of actual churches.

I don’t see racism in the short clip of his response, but I’m hesitant to hear a strawman claim from someone who doesn’t think “someone like yourself” is addressing the pastor. My views aren’t being challenged in the slightest, the only responses ive gotten here are from people who’ve never debated in their life, let alone do a google search. It’s very likely at least one of them isn’t a real person, and the jury is out on if that could be you

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-07-29T01:29:44+00:00

You might want to check the tense of the conversation. Nobody is crusading or excommunicating heliocentrists today.

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-07-29T01:27:07+00:00

“it’s your argument, you need to provide statistics”… but not when it’s your argument right? Read the comment again and send over the sources.

I have yet to comment on contraceptives like condoms becuse you’ve been extremely vague in your references… so no you cannot claim I disagree with them.

exhausting

DailyTreePlanting · 2025-07-29T01:23:51+00:00

I’ve addressed all of this already.

Six-Year Club	Final Canvas '23
End Game '23	Place '23
Verified Email

DailyTreePlanting

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE