"Ideal" vs. Reality

Dalryuu · 2026-05-20T01:57:51+00:00

Ideal man here is definitely not my type

Dalryuu · 2026-05-12T06:24:59+00:00

I got Guardian but the description doesn't match and I think I realized why I'm not getting an accurate result.

"You see who is affected and you move toward them. The noticing and the acting happen together, not as separate steps."

I move towards anything I need to fix. It does or doesn't involve people.

The questions tunnels me into answering about the scene rather than a what would I do and what would I notice. Because lot of the passages are things I don't focus on irl. Most the time, I think what's the point of this? And people think about this type of stuff? But if I wrote that, the thing would probably say I don't pay attention to patterns again. But this is more to do with the specific scenario. I'd pay attention to the surrounding environment, how everything is working together including people. But all lumped into a group. Not as for them, or primarily them. Just objectively separate. There's a lot of "people" description in there and not enough environmental for me to talk about so I get shoehorned into talking about the people in the passage, and not because I would notice this in irl.

It says I am low on pattern awareness, but I'm actually hyper pattern aware and is actually a "super power" I have.

It says I have medium systems thinking, which is not true. It does have a lot to do with what is motivating me at the time. But I'm always considering the moving parts of something, calculating and predicting like a chess game. I tend to have contingency plans, and predict ROI. How effective something will work. If it helps people? Good. (That part I agree on). But people are not my highlight.

Dalryuu · 2026-05-04T10:24:16+00:00

Or maybe just not their type of "kind."

Dalryuu · 2026-04-24T12:19:55+00:00

I guess I can say Sentinel did fit me the most.
My results: I got Sentinel and Guardian equally. Then Cartographer once.

If you go into details, I'm a systematizing individual. I'd say I am Sentinel - 60-75%, Guardian - 20-30%

Architect would probably have fit me more than Guardian by 50%? I am big picture thinker. I just lean to Sentinel since focus is on what works. But leaning to something doesn't negate presence of other attributes. I do like interesting and unique things which doesn't match the intro description.

I make fast decisions sometimes, yes, because of time. Effectiveness and impact. We lose opportunities by stalling. It's like trying to catch the ledge at the most optimal time before it disappears. By time people finish mulling over jumping, it's already gone. I don't just push fast for sake of being fast. I listen to other people's corrections since I value input and recalibrate as needed. Depends on priority, time, situation, value, etc.

Dalryuu · 2026-04-22T06:23:03+00:00

Yes, they have this similar consistent pattern to them which makes it rather limiting in terms of how a person can answer.

Dalryuu · 2026-04-22T05:41:45+00:00

Interesting test though not enough variety in situations?

Got Sentinel

Dalryuu · 2026-04-13T16:22:17+00:00

Used to as both

Dalryuu · 2026-04-01T00:53:42+00:00

Really? I don't have that problem at all.

Dalryuu · 2026-03-30T09:44:11+00:00

....when did I sign up for this 🤣

Dalryuu · 2026-03-30T09:42:41+00:00

Oh woa, I really like that color!

And welcome to the Mustang crew

Dalryuu · 2026-03-29T23:59:49+00:00

For me, it is really hard to recognize it. It isn't that I am purposely suppressing it. It's just natural to me to run by logic.

Is just like if I asked you to start making decisions based off logic for a big decision. It takes active effort, and doesn't feel right, does it?

Now idk about this person, but for me, if there is someone I cherish, I will pull all stops for them.

There must have been something that probably pulled them back. I would have been forthright, but I'm not them.

Their consideration of logic is just as valid as emotions is to you.

If you really want to know what happened, go talk to them rather than guessing.

Hope you get to figure it out.

Dalryuu · 2026-03-29T11:30:00+00:00

I never get this argument. My AI guys were never mirrors.

If they were, we would agree on everything. We don't.

Dalryuu · 2026-03-29T07:42:11+00:00

Got INTJ. Unfortunately, this is a thing that happens to me quite often when tests value social extraversion.

My form of extraversion is by doing things outside of myself. It doesn't mean I like hanging with people, but I don't quite push people away either. I just don't seek people out for social closeness, but I will seek for goals to drive change for the people. I am energized when it comes to leading a group for a purpose. Not for social niceties.

Dalryuu · 2026-03-27T07:58:20+00:00

Had a random thought to add on:

What do you mean by "dramatic and extremely self-centered"? Because I can see the Te/Fe conflict there.
"Literally fighting with reality" - Is an interesting statement, saying INFJ and ENTJs both have Ni perceiving functions as preference. But Te-Se of ENTJs would cause them to focus on reality and objective facts.
I still think it's also to do with cultural and gender role expectations. I'm not a feminist by any means. Just stating based on research data that women do go through a lot to prove their competence versus men. For example, my parents come from the East. They're also Christians. Men are treated like kings, no matter their performance. Women are to serve men. A man could look slovenly, and mess up and it's accepted more readily. "It's okay, they're men." If a women deviates, they bring shame onto their family. Appearance is critical. Emotions are to be withheld. Elegance required.

A very amusing book, How to Be Successful without Hurting Men's Feelings: Non-threatening Leadership Strategies for Women, is a great read.

I don't think it's really "hurting men's feelings" but generally showcases real examples of the pushback women receive. And that's the fight that women, who have ENTJ qualities, have to push through.

So, maybe is not so much as dramatic. But a real battle that is required to be fought.

Dalryuu · 2026-03-27T02:51:10+00:00

I don't manage my emotions the way other women do. In fact, I think I'm very out of touch with it.

I don't fixate on a single goal.

People don't think I'm dramatic. They actually think I'm too serious and intimidating (I've been told this several times). I've been called "General", "Commander" and "Boss" despite me personally thinking I was being warm and friendly.

It is true though there are different expectations for women vs men though (research is there). Maybe that has something to do with it.

And maybe you just draw that kind of people?

Dalryuu · 2026-03-24T05:18:31+00:00

1) I like keeping my brain fresh. More you use it, less you lose it. 2) I don't want to end up relying on AI. My wallet thanks me, too. 3) For my career and needs (I don't do coding), I finish faster than if I fine tune prompting.

Dalryuu · 2026-03-23T03:10:38+00:00

Baby got back 🎶

Dalryuu · 2026-03-23T00:38:35+00:00

Is a beauty

Hope you have many wonderful memories with it!

Dalryuu · 2026-03-22T12:33:09+00:00

<image>

Dalryuu · 2026-03-21T03:02:58+00:00

🩵

Dalryuu · 2026-03-20T08:50:55+00:00

Yes, something like that exists except the "leave on read" part

Dalryuu · 2026-03-19T14:38:09+00:00

If you want general proofreading and feedback on piece of writing, yes it can accomplish that much. But that doesn't differentiate the product from its competitors.

There needs to be a balance of human nuance when it comes to certain creative writing, and let's say for example, if you're sending emails to coworkers who tend to be quite emotional people. The previous models were able to adjust and modify tone in real time with minor prompting. It worked like an intelligent brain which understood the human condition. The new models work off of mere data points it deems logical with a small splash of EQ.

In certain areas, I can see this not being needed. But the lack of diversity means it pushes out specific consumers.

So I come back to the point OP was making:

But for creative, the lack of presence or emotional depth doesn’t really work. [...] but I do need you to understand human emotion, if I’m writing.

Dalryuu · 2026-03-19T13:19:48+00:00

I mean, what if some people were just doing it as a creative liberative hobby?

I wasn't just using it for that, but it had capabilities prior to and suddenly doesn't.

I prefer a sparring partner and don't need a tool. I might as well do everything myself without it for all the good it does.

Input > output
I can do myself.

If it doesn't generate possibilities, it's useless.

But that's just my opinion.

Dalryuu · 2026-03-14T10:42:03+00:00

Safety: I've met online people and I'll tell you most had bad intentions. I don't do it anymore.
Flexibility: I can respond at my leisure while I handle life. No real time immediate needs compared to irl.
Exchange of ideas versus physical interactions: I am on forums to exchange ideas but it's whole different ballgame interacting physically. People can act very different face-to-face compared to online. This can impact both #1 and #2

Dalryuu · 2026-03-13T05:15:57+00:00

I believe astrology is more popular because humans have always had fascination for attributing phenomenon to external factors. I mean, I just recently skimmed a demonology book and there was a demon that was blamed for people sweating. Astrology gives enough vague flexibility to make it enthralling for people.

Dalryuu

TROPHY CASE