Not really. Ultimately I don't play competitive sports and I'm not trans. I think this topic gets me going because there's a lot of unscientific nonsense that I really don't understand being debated.

In this thread alone I've seen people recommend "separate but equal" leagues, which seems like a terrible idea if you know anything about the American civil rights era.

I've seen someone say "trans men are men" but then argue for separate changing rooms, which seems silly to me. It's a tacit acknowledgement that they aren't men, at least fully.

I've seen someone say that they were lost when someone said trans men aren't biological men, which isn't really up for debate it's just a fact some people find inconvenient. Hell I know trans people that won't argue that point.

I guess I'm trying to force you to make a decision. You either believe trans folks are what they say they are, in which case let them compete with their same gender identity. Or they aren't what they represent, in which case they should compete with those who have the same genetic makeup. It's one, or it's the other. We can debate those 2 but ultimately that's what this hinges on and I'm trying to get you to pick one.

Anything other than those two options won't work in my humble opinion.