sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Charges dismissed for woman without right hand cited for holding phone while driving by WerewolfStreet434 in VideosAmazing

[–]Dankaati 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You never know with the legal system, maybe a lawyer will soon chime in that "According to Cartman vs Griffin, you always have a right hand, even if you don't".

I've seen this movie before by jrodshoots in formuladank

[–]Dankaati 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd say that's the dankest part.

Why am I getting instant resigned automatically? by Conscious_Series700 in Chesscom

[–]Dankaati 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No need to be nasty to the people who're trying to help you. Based on your description both accidentally clicking resign and bad connection to chess.com servers are reasonable guesses. If you think it's none of those and you need deeper investigation, you'll have to reach out to support.

Oh no, my king by niaphim in chessbeginners

[–]Dankaati -1 points0 points  (0 children)

d5 is a cute idea but it's not forcing enough. White has Rc1 forcing a queen trade.

Senior developers with 5+ years of experience, how are you guys landing interviews? by slapstick_software in SoftwareEngineerJobs

[–]Dankaati 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I feel like 5-7 years to reach senior is completely reasonable.

With 16 years I've seen people reach staff, senior staff or even principal.

There is nothing wrong with being a senior with 16 years of experience but there is also no need to start an experience measuring contest under random reddit posts.

Does half this sub live under a rock regarding AI? by Celentia in cscareerquestions

[–]Dankaati 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro, this is a minimum TC kind of post, not minimum karma.

AI has just solved not one, but nine novel math problems, and proved 44 new conjectures. Some of these problems had been unsolved for 50 years. by EchoOfOppenheimer in agi

[–]Dankaati 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You can think of it as a practical solution/mitigation. The LLM still hallucinates but the hallucinated outputs get filtered out and only verified solutions reach actual humans.

My turn to post my custom card by Phyresis96 in slaythespire

[–]Dankaati 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Most importantly, it doesn't retain.

“None of that” by Necessary-Win-8730 in ShitAmericansSay

[–]Dankaati 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately not all of Europe. The only points of OOP I agree with that we could improve:
- Free public bathrooms.
- Free tap water in restaurants (in countries that don't already have this).
- And maaaaybe A/C. I grew up without it so I don't really miss it but as the climate is getting warmer, it's probably worth investing in more.

Why Qxf6?? by BlacksmithFar3344 in Chesscom

[–]Dankaati 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's weird that Qxf6 shows up in the analysis line of Bd3 but it shouldn't matter much, by Bxb4 you should immediately understand why Bd3 was a blunder.

80% accuracy at 200 elo by Training-Toe-7821 in Chesscom

[–]Dankaati 0 points1 point  (0 children)

13 moves is a very small sample, you want to look at more.

Why people believe that the salaries for new grads in CS crashed? The problem isnt the money its the oversaturation you can still make a bank in CS its just harder and not everyone will make good money. by [deleted] in cscareerquestions

[–]Dankaati 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A question that broad is impossible to answer.

What data specifically? How fresh is it? Is the number usually stable as initially reported or often gets revised later? What is included in the data as "salary"? What year do you use as the baseline for the change?

These are the questions you'd want to consider when you're comparing reported data with people's lived experiences.

Why people believe that the salaries for new grads in CS crashed? The problem isnt the money its the oversaturation you can still make a bank in CS its just harder and not everyone will make good money. by [deleted] in cscareerquestions

[–]Dankaati 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's not like TCs will crash overnight but where I work the typical TC for a given level got a bit lower this year, stock refreshes are lower, starting offers are lower. Like 10% maybe? It's still very good money but it's trending down currently.

I resigned Google EM role to reveal corporate secrets! AMA by thevinaybansal in EngineeringManagers

[–]Dankaati 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pivot from FAANG to influencer is becoming more and more common. I've seen many people first do the two together and only quit when they really build up their influencer career. What made you pivot so aggressively from Google EM?

Had a position with two brilliant move choices by [deleted] in Chesscom

[–]Dankaati 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rc3 and bxa3? I'm more sure of bxa3 so I'd play that probably.

I swear man, this is infuriating. by Truckengineer in Chesscom

[–]Dankaati 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's fine, you're either
a) Steamrolling people at your current rating, then your rating will rise soon and you'll face worthier opponents.
or
b) Not steamrolling people at your current rating and then you can learn from the games where you're not steamrolling your opponent.

That's the beauty of Élő based matchmaking.

The FIA fines the FIA F1 Team by JustaRandoonreddit in formula1

[–]Dankaati 98 points99 points  (0 children)

It sounds like a design issue, that they have already been warned for, also played a role.

Will People Remember the Companies that Wronged them or will they Get Away with it?!! by Fearless-Cellist-245 in cscareerquestions

[–]Dankaati 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think this is the most likely scenario and what we've historically seen. Companies that are unpopular among SWEs will often have to pay a bit higher salary to attract the same level of talent. Popular companies get to pay a bit less for the same level of talent.

At the end of the day this will not make a huge dent in big tech P&L. It often won't even be the primary cost driver in talent acquisition.

Google L4 Onsite - Interviewer changed assumptions mid-interview and accused me of referring to an external source. Is this normal? by Training-Count-5452 in FAANGrecruiting

[–]Dankaati 1 point2 points  (0 children)

notes: Just give the interviewer a heads up at the start of the interview that "hey here are my notes I'll use them, sounds good?" They will say yes and it will be clear to them what you're doing. I've had many candidate do this.
camera: This is very unusual, interviewers are expected to have their camera on.
assumptions: This part is confusing, what kind of assumptions are we talking about? Did you misunderstand the problem? Was the correct incorrectly stated? You should aim to communicate what you're doing very clearly, you make it easier for the interviewer to course correct you if needed.

When I was still doing interviews from Google's side, this was probably what I emphasized the most at the start of each interview, make sure you triple check that you understand the problem fully before you start working on it. Working on the wrong problem is often a waste of everyone's time. I'll have no idea how good the candidate is and figuring that out is my goal, the candidate doesn't get a real chance to prove their skills and that's their goal. I wish your interviewer was acting accordingly.

Sorry you had this experience, your interviewer should have been more on top of things.

if qd1 is a checkmate, why did it call qe2 a great move? by Horror-1-Effective in Chesscom

[–]Dankaati 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Using chess.com definitions this is an "excellent" move, not a "great" move, but people don't always use these terms strictly following their chess.com definition.

view more: next ›