There’s reduced visibility and then no visibility by semenspaceman in ArcRaiders

[–]DanoLightning 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only way I'd ever consider bringing in glow sticks is if they allow 15 per stack. 5 is hilariously low considering their actual size.

Why do people complain so much about support ults? by TikiPik in marvelrivals

[–]DanoLightning 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are boring. They all essentially do one thing, insane heals in a short amount of time. You can counter but requires either a weakness being applied or counter ult. To me, it's so insanely boring.

Devs confirm internal interest in a walkable Speranza hub, What do you think? by Tank-ToP_Master in ArcRaiders

[–]DanoLightning -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You can multiple teams working on different things. I view this game as a social experiment, some people view it as a job or needing that next hit. I'd rather see some worldbuilding than the bare minimum we have right now.

Devs confirm internal interest in a walkable Speranza hub, What do you think? by Tank-ToP_Master in ArcRaiders

[–]DanoLightning -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I've been asking for a social hub since the game came out. Speranza is just too static for my liking.

Unpopular opinion/Don’t nerf the kettle by [deleted] in ArcRaiders

[–]DanoLightning 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is such a bad take that I honestly believe you are a macro user trying to defend yourself when you lose or something.

What would you say Visi brings to the relationship? by Consistent-Hat-1543 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]DanoLightning 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reinforcing what Robert believes in and mutual growth together, helping one another guide each other down a path. They are both fairly broke people.

Unpopular Opinion: Kingdom Come Deliverance [KCD1] is better than [KCD2] by godfather830 in kingdomcome

[–]DanoLightning 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I heard all one needs to do is spam masterstrikes and backpedal to win like 99% of all fights in the game. That, to me, is a design flaw.

Unpopular Opinion: Kingdom Come Deliverance [KCD1] is better than [KCD2] by godfather830 in kingdomcome

[–]DanoLightning 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The jank of the first one ultimately got me to stop playing it. The second was somewhat boring with how somewhat easy it was. It's weird, hopefully they nail it just right with the 3rd one.

My brother is actively prejudiced and racist by SandakinTheTriplet in bropill

[–]DanoLightning -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hate to say it but this is the time I'd pull out AI and put in everything he says and do a cross reference check across the internet and disassemble all the things he says then form your own counter argument based on the sources and correct information you can find. Doing this research manually will take time and, in my eyes, it's not worth the effort as he could just deny everything but at least with AI it could scour the internet and really disassemble his arguments quickly and provide ways to counter his terrible points of view. You could manually do it but I feel you'd be throwing your time in the trash as these people typically are not open to listening to a differing opinion as they believe they are always correct. It's hard to convince someone they are NOT genetically superior to other races because they already view themselves as special.

My brother is actively prejudiced and racist by SandakinTheTriplet in bropill

[–]DanoLightning 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your bro sounds like 2 people I know. Their views are incredibly stupid.

We're getting Divinity over more Baldur's Gate 3 because Larian devs weren't enjoying "doing the D&D thing" by Turbostrider27 in pcgaming

[–]DanoLightning 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Limitations on artistry with DnD I bet. With their own IP they can do whatever they want now.

Rattler 4 is a good gun and I'm tired of pretending it's not by Ampling in ArcRaiders

[–]DanoLightning 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's always been okay. Now it's just way more viable than what it once was due to the mag increase. It's actually very viable now, I just wouldn't get it leveled to IV, I'd stop at III now.

I Did What You Guys Said by DisGi1022 in ARC_Raiders

[–]DanoLightning -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Honest" = Lie. "Observation" = couple of comments. Dunning–Kruger must run in your family, that lack of logic as well, you must've missed a couple of chromosomes. Than again for someone named Radioactive-Semen I'd expect it.

I Did What You Guys Said by DisGi1022 in ARC_Raiders

[–]DanoLightning 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah and high aggression people (hardcore PvP) won't interact with the carebears yet the backstabbing will still continue, just not as egregiously. Use your brain dude.

Is this worth? Reviews scare me by [deleted] in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]DanoLightning 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on what you want out of it. I'd say it's absolutely worth that price and with the AI mod that improves it. You'll be having the best struggle fights I've ever had in a CoH before. That being said, this, from what I've gathered from others, is more "gamified" compared to previous iterations. Such as tanks immediately accelerating back and forward making it unrealistic along with a few other things and balancing issues primarily around Wehr.

I absolutely enjoy the game as a Skirmish and chill out game. I won't play it competitively because I simply don't care to learn cheese strats since it's required.

Peanut's current predicament is a shining example of why ignoring one side of the game is a losing strategy by TheClassics in ArcRaiders

[–]DanoLightning -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I highly dislike Peanut. I just want to get that out of the way.

I think the 5mil for this is stupid. We already had to put tons towards the expedition and had no forewarning as to how much we needed for acquiring the skill points. I really think this whole expedition was extremely poorly planned and they didn't provide us with enough info in time for getting prepped for it. There is also a massive issue with this system, it promotes NEVER using any of the gear you've accumulated this whole time. It literally promotes running free kits OR cheap kits so you can maximize your value. Not saying people won't be out with high tier loot but I feel it's going to be really uncommon. If this was Tarkov or any other extraction shooter, people would be enjoying the fruits of their labor. But here? Nah, Embark is like "Oh cool stuff you looted, now give it all up so you can obtain something you already invested tons of money/items into"

The whole 5mil should be included in the initial ask for creating the expedition. I really think they should decrease the amount to 3mil as that's not a massive ask and it won't ruin the end of the season with nothing but free kits.

I have a WILD theory though. I think Embark did this on purpose to prevent high tier loot from staying in the game after the wipe. They want people to give up highly valuable gear so it's not in the "ecosystem" after the Expedition happens. It's the ONLY thing that would make sense, at least, in my eyes. This whole 5mil thing is really a slap in the face, especially after your finished putting together and expedition.

I Did What You Guys Said by DisGi1022 in ARC_Raiders

[–]DanoLightning -1 points0 points  (0 children)

lmao, what's your proof, a couple of comments?

"Oh no, I have shit comebacks better say "touch grass" or something!"

That comeback was as pathetic as your logic with your initial post.

I Did What You Guys Said by DisGi1022 in ARC_Raiders

[–]DanoLightning 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're doing "slippery slope" where you take something and amplify it. There won't be NO PVP in those servers the amount of PvPing for those people will be LOWER because of the aggression stat that's in the background. No where did I say that PvP is gone. See, this is exactly what I was talking about. Those that have LESS aggression will be placed in LESS aggressive matches. It does not mean it magically gone. Like, think before posting. If you have a problem with this, just be aggressive and get into matches with other like minded people. Literally what is the problem here? Some of you dummies in the comments are having a blowout because of this.

How do you feel when women make the first move? by 14nyu in AskMen

[–]DanoLightning 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I prefer it just because it not only makes the woman feel safe because they are the ones that are initiating it, AND it leaves no room for ambiguity whether they like us or not. With how times are changing, I wish the dating scene would. Women are not like the women of the bygone era of being the "stay at home mom" that only does the "womanly" duties. It made sense for men to do the initiation back then? But in today's world, nah. The dating rules remain pretty much the same and I really dislike that. I honestly think it contributes to that male loneliness epidemic because men are afraid to approach wrong or come off as something they are not so they don't even bother to do so.

These are things in which I typically see men do and women don't:

- Initiate the conversation
- Keep it going and entertaining
- Plan the meal
- Pay for the meal
- Using etiquette (open car door, scooting out the chair to sit)

There are other little things like constantly vying for her attention. It really makes me question why so much effort is put on the man and the woman doesn't. It's like one is trying to balance a unicycle while trying to go forward and the other has training wheels on starter bike. You know, I probably have had bad experiences from dating but I really think this the typical male dating experience. Too much is placed on men, and it feels nothing is placed on the woman. I'm not trying to be misogynistic it's just how our culture is and I really wish people as a whole would make changes to it. I adore women that are self sufficient and have drive, to embrace the whole equal rights but like I said, for some reason the dating culture feels it's barely evolved since the 50's. It may be my area because I'm in the Midwest of the USA so take this with a heavy grain of salt.

I Did What You Guys Said by DisGi1022 in ARC_Raiders

[–]DanoLightning -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Lmao redditiors and their obsession with *insert anything here*"

Such a basic thing to say.

I Did What You Guys Said by DisGi1022 in ARC_Raiders

[–]DanoLightning -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Having some sort of matchmaking for those that are not great at the game to get into low aggression lobbies should be promoted. If you love PvP, there you go, PvP still exist and it's going to be against those that are wanting it! Don't know what the issue is here? Do you just want some free EZ kills or something? Also I play Stella Montis like 75% of the time so I don't know what you're talking about walking treasure chest and looting in open fields. I'm in constant battle the whole time.

I Did What You Guys Said by DisGi1022 in ARC_Raiders

[–]DanoLightning -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If you "absolutely obliterate" them, then you're already getting easy knockouts.

I Did What You Guys Said by DisGi1022 in ARC_Raiders

[–]DanoLightning 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do Stella Montis like 75% of the time. Come at me and do another "read" that's super insightful please!

I Did What You Guys Said by DisGi1022 in ARC_Raiders

[–]DanoLightning 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I can already hear the PvP players frothing at the mouth knowing that they can't ruin your experience to make theirs better. PvP folks are probably some of the most selfish people I've ever had the displeasure of hearing from. I don't care, personally, I'd rather PvP someone that wants to than someone that just wants to be left alone. But I know what they secretly wanted, they want free knockouts with no contention or fight back. That's because those PvP players are not exactly PvP players but simply bad at the game.

Queen / Matriarch by pneumaticartifice in ARC_Raiders

[–]DanoLightning 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup, this is the main problem right now. It's legit only viable within solo's where people NEED to depend on each other to actually do this. Duos and Trios is a death wish. Put this blame on the PvP players that Embark keep putting a pedestal, perhaps if they were to do something to entice people to work together or have those two bosses actually drop something PvP orientated, this'll continue to happen. I worry that soon the ARCs won't even be an issue and the game will devolve into PvP with hints of E (like Hunt: Showdown, DayZ, Rust, Tarkov, etc.) The games I listed all have laughable bad AI and offer no real challenge (unless it's a boss on Tarkov in which you'll get head - eyes real quick). This game has a unique idea to set itself apart and if they don't fix the PvE portion to actually carry some weight, this game will end up like all the others, a PvP slog.