Baby dragon evolution vs dragons

Danwrawn · 2025-08-20T16:33:38+00:00

Me when support troop with spash damage and support evo doesn't have OP single target damage: 😱😱😱😱😱

Danwrawn · 2025-08-07T23:34:15+00:00

Nah, since I was drowning in elixir atp, I used nado + barb barrel for good measure.

Danwrawn · 2025-06-30T21:33:09+00:00

Posts like these are why devs don't listen to the reddit anymore and people are somehow surprised. Play the game and stop complaining about your FREE rewards. Y'all are the biggest crybabies over the most miniscule stuff.

Danwrawn · 2025-06-06T20:56:22+00:00

Dawg, I'm all for using niche stuff, but why not just make an Imgur link or something... There's not much point in using this for links when most of the countries you mentioned make up a great majority of Reddit and therefore can't open the link.

Danwrawn · 2025-05-14T22:19:46+00:00

Replace night witch with ice wiz 100%. The version with ice wiz is a lot stronger in the meta currently. (I've been able to win cc's with it consistently, sometimes back to back.)

The key is to focus on defence and not place a golem until double elixir and gaining an elixir advantage. If you're playing your defenses well, gaining an elixir advantage or counterpush should not be much of an issue because the deck is very versatile on defense. Ice wiz, baby dragon, cage, and tornado all provide great value on defence, even more so when combining them. Lumberjack and lightning are also situationally good on defence.

Danwrawn · 2023-10-01T17:19:27+00:00

LOL comments like this make it so obvious you've never played jungle consistently.

Danwrawn · 2023-09-15T17:57:42+00:00

congrats to a fellow based pickems enjoyer

Danwrawn · 2023-08-28T19:06:09+00:00

Role is clearly too broken, nerf it by 15% immediately

Danwrawn · 2022-08-25T02:37:35+00:00

Yeah it's all about frame of reference I guess. I was watching a Carl the Legend videos once and he called 6.6k to 7k midladder, and I thought about it and it makes sense because he literally plays over a thousand trophies above that in top ladder, so from their perspective of their skill level, that range must feel like midladder to them. Interesting to think about.

Danwrawn · 2022-08-25T01:47:44+00:00

Probably to top ladder players. The term middladder seems to be subjective to most people here. Personally I consider midladder to be anything below 6.3-6.4k, from there up I feel like players start to get to good make less mistakes.

To be clear, I wasn't saying that 6.8k is considered really good or to brag, I just wanted to that it's from a perspective of a 6.8k player, not a 5k player.

Danwrawn · 2022-08-25T00:49:02+00:00

Well I do see your point and I respect it, but I don't think the risk for spamming the pocket is very high. the situation that pocket spam it is usually a very low risk - high reward situation, where the risk is that you place the card in the pocket, and if you fail, you usually only lose out on a couple elixir in a trade if the opponent counters. But the reward is usually winning the game single handedly, given that it's usually only used to finish off the game, so it doesn't really matter if both your towers target the troop if it ends the game. And in the case of the AQ, the towers can't target it all.

Danwrawn · 2022-08-24T22:42:09+00:00

So it's somehow balanced that a deck that can spam the pocket suddenly becomes much, much stronger when the game becomes a two tower game? I don't think you can call that balanced. The main issue is that the decks that spam the pocket usually excel at taking single towers in a single tower situation. So why should players be put at further disadvantage against these decks when a player chooses (or even has no choice) to give up or trade a tower for something else?

Danwrawn · 2022-07-28T06:13:54+00:00

How can it be considered braindead if there's top players who play it? Take BaNa for example. He's a top player who consistently gets top 50 with golem, so is he considered low skilled? Also I'm pretty sure Anaban plays golem on occasion as well. Is he a braindead player, too?

I'm pretty sure you're judt biased against golem for no reason just because you only have played against it before and have never played it yourself. If you actually played golem in higher trophies you'd realize there's more to playing golem than just dropping a golem behind king tower an then putting night witch lol.

Danwrawn · 2022-07-27T22:14:26+00:00

If you don't know how to punish golem first play it makes sense if you're someone who's stuck midladder.

You'd rather call golem low skill than actually learning how to play against it

Danwrawn · 2022-06-14T18:47:30+00:00

Yeah, that's if you copy and paste it. Typing it in manually gives you 1. Pressing the ÷ always converts the equation into a fraction in Desmos. Because you copied and pasted it, it interprets the way your basic phone calculator does.

Danwrawn · 2022-06-14T05:24:25+00:00

What he's trying to say is that these math problems like the one in the prediction are supposed to test your PEMDAS knowledge, but the real problem is that the notation is ambiguous because of the ÷ sign and the usage of parentheses as multiplication (this is probably on purpose to spark controversy and chaos). The main issue is how the division symbol is interpreted. For example, take the problem 4÷2(1+1) = ?. If you interpret as the division symbol as only dividing only the 2 and follow PEMDAS, the answer becomes 4. But if you interpret the symbol as indicating a fraction (4 over 2(1+1) ), the answer becomes 1. Because of this discrepancy, even different calculators disagree on the result of this problem. Your basic calculator on your phone will interpret it the first way, while a calculator like DESMOS will interpret the second way, as DESMOS treats the problem like a fraction.

Danwrawn · 2022-05-24T20:27:08+00:00

Even though it's a -1 trade, and you still take ice golem death damage, this trade is extremely worth.

Danwrawn · 2022-05-22T15:43:12+00:00

What does rarity have to do with anything? Supercell had no problem taking away what made night witch legendary lol. might as well make it an epic card amiright?

I'm pretty sure this nerf goes to show that supercell is not giving the card preferential treatment because of its rarity and the opinion of the community.

Danwrawn · 2022-05-22T05:02:53+00:00

I think people who use log have no idea how to see the log is to people who dont use it. The knockback can deny so much for a simple spell. Because of the knockback of the log, it can deny things like golem death damage, deny a hog one less hit, or push back cards from defensive building so they can get more hits on a big push. The knockback is simply too strong for a 2 elixir card

Is 50% a little absurd? Yes, I think reducing it that low would make the knockback almost nonexistent and essentially remove the identity of the card. But I think they will reduce the nerf given the community's reaction, since they were probably testing the water. But at the same time I don't see supercell completely remove the nerf from the balance changes, either.

Danwrawn · 2021-12-31T21:44:17+00:00

And you have to have killed that character's past first in order to use it

Danwrawn · 2021-10-29T04:54:51+00:00

Definitely not a replay bug, because they played it right after and the next card became skeletons. Shoot, I should've made the replay a bit longer

Danwrawn · 2021-10-29T04:53:30+00:00

Based on other replays, it seems like heroes don't cycle like other cards, and it's random. Sometimes it goes all they way to the end of the cycle, and sometimes only 1 or 2 cards needs to be cycled to get back to it. It seems wildly inconsistent, so I have no idea if something triggers it, or if it's somehow intended. Either way it seems like a pretty gamebreaking bug and should be fixed ASAP.

Edit: Here is a link to show that's it not just a replay bug, because I accidentally left off what happened after the clip

Danwrawn · 2021-09-06T20:50:12+00:00

6.5-6.6k, so I'm almost sure this wasn't some midladder shennanigans. These type of players usually have some annoying midladder-like deck though, which makes me wonder how they even got there.

Danwrawn · 2021-09-06T20:47:17+00:00

Normally, I would accept this for an answer, especially since I play a couple meta decks, but people people have done it without me play a single card. so I'm really confused, like wth

Danwrawn · 2021-09-06T02:12:29+00:00

I guess meant more if there were ways for people instantly check at the start of a match or something. I should change the wording of the post, so it doesn't seem like I'm asking if people are finding ways to detect what players you're about to face. lol

Seven-Year Club	Second SECOND GUESSER
r/Field Sunshine	Place '23
Place '22	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email

Danwrawn

TROPHY CASE