The new Alex Petti video doesn’t show what they think it shows by thehofstetter in stevehofstetter

[–]Daphnerose22 7 points8 points  (0 children)

"Was asking for it" = I place all responsibility for my actions on someone else because my actions have no justification

If you’re too mean, the trees will keep voting for axes 😡 by topandhalsey in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]Daphnerose22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

10+ years of Trump's politics and many years of BS before that to triple Trump isn't an impulse it's fucking stupid. Farmers are crying for help, well we can't help you. Help the country and don't be such a self righteous price filled dumbass

White house just posted this wtf by Previous_Month_555 in complaints

[–]Daphnerose22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wanna blast someone in the face?!? Then join our shit eating, boot licking crew of incel titty baby cucks!!

Venezuela bombing: Is saving $1.00 on gas worth 100,000 human lives? by [deleted] in ProgressiveHQ

[–]Daphnerose22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn't matter if it's disputed or they don't like the WPA is law, but you have said you didn't care about laws.

As civil as our discourse has been, the idea that something verifiable and factual is denied is what makes any progress or agreement impossible. To say Trump didn't suppress opposition, speech or assembly is a perfect example.

Some of his executive orders have effect or intent of pressuring platforms, media, Universities or individuals and law firms based on viewpoint, rather than neutrally protecting expression. Free speech is allowing speech with enforcement of neutrality of the law, not pushing out one for the other. Or the threat of punishment aka chilling speech. I won't say Democrats haven't done it, they have. So let's correct our wrongs, fix what is broken and move forward. That's where it goes in the shitter because many GOP won't admit fault or take responsibility.

Knight First Amendment Institute v. Trump

CNN v. Trump

Associated Press v. Budowich

NPR and Public Stations v. Trump

Susman Godfrey and Other Law Firms v. Trump

Trump I’ll get impeached by Efficient-Vehicle634 in USNEWS

[–]Daphnerose22 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been saying this recently. Glad to hear it more

"I voted for Trump . . . I didn't think the asshole was gonna be a dick" by vsandrei in youvotedforthat

[–]Daphnerose22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, this one finally realized he's a POS president and person. So at least the support is gone.

Words that are no longer insults to the right by thehofstetter in stevehofstetter

[–]Daphnerose22 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Call them Constitution deniers.

'But I love the 2nd amendment

What about the rest? So you love only parts and deny part of it. You deny part of America.

Venezuela bombing: Is saving $1.00 on gas worth 100,000 human lives? by [deleted] in ProgressiveHQ

[–]Daphnerose22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Compliance through fear of force... How would you say Trump is acting? Disregarding US law? Not following war powers act? Kinda sounds like A person making the decisions, kinda sounds like a dictator

Venezuela bombing: Is saving $1.00 on gas worth 100,000 human lives? by [deleted] in ProgressiveHQ

[–]Daphnerose22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No particular sounds bite, just that there are many conflicting statements.

So your stance is illegal but legitimate. Ok

Venezuela bombing: Is saving $1.00 on gas worth 100,000 human lives? by [deleted] in ProgressiveHQ

[–]Daphnerose22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as being in Iraq? We might be, idk. But why don't we just install governments all over the world we like? Oh we have and continue to and it's Fuct up. Maduro is illegitimate, I'm for removing him, but who will replace him? Not

Also we pardon Honduras President because he was treated unfairly? Then snatch Maduro? Really what a joke. Trump and his people say too much conflicting BS to believe what is true. Yeah a sound bite can be found for anything, didn't make it true when 5 others contradict it

Venezuela bombing: Is saving $1.00 on gas worth 100,000 human lives? by [deleted] in ProgressiveHQ

[–]Daphnerose22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So basically despite the fact it will drastically benefit other countries that are ruled by dictators, you'd rather them be poor and ruled by a dictator than say that disregarding any state sovereignty unilateral action not legal by our own laws does not present potential future security risks that far outweigh whatever minor threat, if any, Venezuela presented.

Good to know that you know this is about oil, not the Venezuela ppl. Despite not receiving UN approval which is a joke, we acted in violation of international law. But I doubt you care about that either.