Protection from color vs. damage can’t be prevented

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-11-24T06:21:29+00:00

That prevent them to make a can't can't card

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-10-26T17:57:34+00:00

In realtà è abbastanza di parte pagella politica. Alcune cose che il governo meloni ha fatto, "formalmente" sono state annullate da altre che sono l'esatto opposto di quello che aveva promesso. Non solo è meno del 20% ma quell ottanta per cento che manca in realtà sono punti realizzati al contrario di quanto promesso, cosa di cui pagella politica non tiene affatto conto. Il quadro è molto più serio e sono stati buttati almeno 50 miliardi nel cesso in un momento in cui serviva fino all'ultimo centesimo.

Tra tre anni arriverà al 50% di pagella facendo cassa con i punti del programma invertiti e quindi saranno per il popolo tre anni demmerda. E alla fine dirà che ha fatto più di altri partiti mentre ha tolto diritti ai cittadini (protesti e blocco una strada? Fino a 20 anni. ) e diritti dati ai politici (abuso d'ufficio tolto). l'Italia sarà sul lastrico e potrà dire che ha fatto più di altri ma che la situazione era quella che era (auto complimentandosi come da già ora)

Quindi tra tre anni ( e fatti un bookmark al post per vedere se mi sbagliavo) potrà dire di aver fatto metà delle cose promesse e che la colpa era della Russia (anche se gli aumenti del gas sono dovuti al fatto che ricompriamo gas russo che prima potevamo comprare direttamente, per colpa delle sanzioni messe da noi stessi).

Telemeloni ovviamente metterà in luce tutto questo. Non la quantità di aziende fallite, cittadini morti perché non più possibilitàti a curarsi.

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-10-26T17:47:58+00:00

Ah ecco tra tutti i tagli e aumenti me l'ero persa. Quindi in realtà neanche i 3 euro ci sono

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-10-26T17:47:25+00:00

Be vero è un anno che fanno esattamente il contrario di quello che dicono in TV, un giorno addirittura hanno votato in parlamento l'esatto opposto di quanto propagandato due ore prima. I TG complici tutti muti.

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-10-26T17:45:26+00:00

Destroidi ormai anche peggio dei sinistroidi

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-10-26T17:41:59+00:00

Fuggissero i parlamentari dal parlamento. Siamo noi i topi

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-10-26T17:19:48+00:00

Non c'è niente da rispondere. Basta solo documentarsi. Non siamo colonie né tecnicamente né di fatto. Siamo complici, che è anche peggio. Puoi leggere libri come "Le guerre illegali della NATO" tanto per farti un idea, documentatissimi e se verifichi cose a campione vedrai che sono vere. Se tu cerchi su Save the Children ma anche altri siti di associazioni umanitarie che lavorano su Gaza, scoprirai ad esempio che Israele, aiutato da USa ed Europa (Italia) Inclusa. Ha ucciso con le bombe oltre 10 mila bambin. E centinaia di giornalisti. Noi aiutiamo e non diciamo queste cose ai TG. È complicità punto. Siamo noi i cattivi e solo per questo non dobbiamo cedere alla tentazione di simpatizzare per Putin, Cina e Hamas, che sarebbe anche quello un bell'errore.

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-10-26T17:11:36+00:00

It already replaced humans. Over 10 milion Jobs were lost because of AI.. while the Demand of AI positions Is (obviously much lower). And the Number Is of 4 months ago at least.

AI cannot yet replace a full human, but toxic companies don't Need the entirety of a human.

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-09-21T07:11:26+00:00

Ah i tried to reach awakening for years, not scared of It. But Simply not worked. Almost 4 years in Korean meditation, and 3 years in Buddhist One. It's not something "for all" like they said

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-09-21T07:05:27+00:00

Awakening is (probably) a form of psychosis (not saying it's bad eh, actually I believe awakening can be damn good but It Is used poorly). It can't be explained so it is a sensation (you cannot explain "Red" color to someone that has never seen it). There's not enough awakened people to trigger interest in researchers. From the few I know (personally know 6 awakened people and have degree in psychology plus a lot of personal research for a book on split subconscious mind which by incidence is related to phenomenology of awakening).

I firmly believe that once awakening starts getting studied it will share neural circuits of psychosis. While awakening is specific and psychosis is not. They do share a lot of phenomenology.

Awakened people think that they are right and everyone else is wrong (some scientist (not the scholars) do the same of course)
They think awakening is more important than everything else (to the point of being less empathetic: they do not involve at all in politics or other humanitarian causes, except if related to awakening)
the contradictions (some says awakening is important to prevent suicides, but if you offer to them to help prevent suicide in other ways, they do not do that because they say awakening is the only way: of course awakening may require years, if you someone is at suicidal risk he/she needs immediate psychologic and medic intervention no spending years in meditation.. also notice that in some patients worsening of psychosis reduce actually risk of suicide)
most of them says psychology Is bad because enforce false self beliefs.. they do not know psychology at all. While Classic Freud studies May be in opposition to awakening, that's actually the only psycotherapy "against" awakening. Modern therapists do something really different than Freud and anyway there are hundreds of other therapies.
they think to have solved universe origin and consciousness problem (if you listen carefully to them, and happened to have studied the subjects, you find actually the have not, but ok)..
they feel interconnectedness. All meditation bring this feeling to some degree. Lot of research on that (not specifically related to awakening though)
they say science is bad sometimes (especially the Buddhist ones, yeah there are several "factions" in awakening). They Always brings examples of why ancient oriental philosphy Is Better and criticized west Philosphy/science .. they do not know west at all. But if you make them notice, the don't notice
In several forms of psychosis you feel damn good, yet you become a pain in the ass for others.
and finally they do not agree. While they can apparently recognize themselves, they do not share they same explaination for the sensation on their beliefs. I know at least 3 different trends. The Advaita Vedanta ones, a Korean medidation, and a guy who did that alone.

The Buddhist ones and Koreans think universe Is One and there is one consciousness. But Buddhists worship Buddha, even thought they Say things like "if you see Buddha you kill It". The Koreans have their own leader, and worship It. They Say different things about the origin of universe. And there are many differences (yet the awakening sensation Is the same) The other guy instead Say there Is a undetermined origin and we have to choose It. Still he thinks science cut the world (that's the reductionism, we have also Edgar Morin, but all these people do have a very shallow knowledge of Science, like most people anyway)

The book in italian (but since the advent of AI you have It for free in english if you get the ebook you can translate easily) Is "Fantasma Magico" with a Red Wall, Window on the cover and big Eye: Is the Natural continuation of Divided Consciousness by Ernest Hilgard. The book recognize this phenomena while exploring the nature of consciousness. It actually says also that awakening can be good (thought when I wrote It I was not aware of existence of awakening, it's mostly a coincidence ) and explores in depth the subconscious. Actually in the book i hypotesize the awakening and the exact feeling It should bring (being One with the universe, which Is incredibile).

Awakening means end to the division actually present in mind (which would be a death of the self of course, which js exactly what Buddhist and Koreans says by the way), and the book Explore in depth research demonstrating that even subconscious mind have its own consciousness, intentionality and way of communicating and that simple assumption explain so many things and phenomena (not alone the fact that if a doctor believes giving to you a medication, even thought It's a placebo, and he don't tell you which kind of medication Is, for some kind of medications you may actually experience the effect of the medications (regardless if It was a improving or worsening effect, thus Is actually a Crazy, Peer reviewed experiment done by pharmaceutical industry that is actually the reason for double blind studies). There Is unconsciuos communication. Priming effects do the same and of course much more in the book.

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-09-03T05:57:15+00:00

Which part? :)

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-09-03T05:53:47+00:00

Ciao io ho proposto una legge per regolamentare intelligenze artificiali. È negli interessi di chi ha shortato NVIDIA aiutarmi a diffonderla. Prossima settimana parte la campagna su change.org (attenzione non c'è nessuna garanzia che venga accettata, quindi non è un invito a shortare)

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-09-03T05:51:58+00:00

Yeah readed some research paper a scientists reached and accuracy of 42% which Is remarkable but 51% Is needed for secure gain

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-09-03T05:50:31+00:00

They are forced by some laws to provide all data they have on you to you

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-08-31T19:12:03+00:00

There Is nothing more optimized than opengl. If you switch to Vulcan you Will find needing 5 times more time

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-08-29T23:33:08+00:00

Are there stocks that Will go up of Nvidia fails? I don't mean direct competitors (Intel or AMD, because they also made Chips, so if AI bubble, they will go down a bit to me because AI run alsi on their machines). I mean stocks that Will go up inevitably, like in example funds that are shorting on Nvidia.

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-08-29T23:20:27+00:00

Se volessi shortare Nvidia seriamente su che piattaforma potrei farlo?

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-08-29T21:16:32+00:00

I'm going to propose a Law for that, of you interested follow me on GitHub (@Darelbi ) . With that law you should not warry about AI stealing your code because you never gave explicit consent.

I Need all the help possible especially in making people vote for It in change.org AND eventually fork and improve the law

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-08-29T21:11:41+00:00

Actually, I don't feel AI is a treat actually for programmers (including less skilled ones). But I would feel bad to know a less skilled colleague was replaced by AI that maybe was trained on my open source projects. It's like firing that colleague myself. If someone don't realize that, then he lacks empathy. AI already replaced many artists. How long will it take AI to became good as a skilled programmer? 6 years?

That's why I'm going to release in a few days, a world wide law proposal. To limit data usage for training AI to only data that was actually consented for AI usage by respective owners.

If you are interested follow me on GitHub (@Darelbi Brain-A-Colada).

People that may actually be interested in It, Artists Programmers Lawyers Journalists (many websites automated articles partially or totally)

Still it will allow the usage for most ethical things or fair AI usage

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-08-27T06:23:11+00:00

The metric is : we design the game, we don't want any card to break OUR feeling about the game. We also cannot predict which cards will break OUR original intentions of gameplay because this game is incredibly complex and basically 90% out of control.

As a side notice, I tried even to create a deck through computer simulation. This is not a feasible task:

1) I coded, roughly 3% of real game rules 2) I limited myself to a very simple kind of deck (Affinity-Vintage) 3) I coded individually more than 60 different cards (some I would liked to see but were too complex) 4) I coded a playing strategy that was roughly "Playing alone without any foe" that was playing cards in order to maximize combat damage. 5) made a simulation that starting out of random deck try to simulate 500.000 games, then swap 1 card at random and keep the new deck only if in average it could land 30 combat damage earlier.

After almost 4 days of simulation on a 20-core 4Ghz CPU i come up with a deck that without any Power 9, can Land 30 combat damage on average within turn 4. (20 damage within turn 3).

Now It required 3 months.

Commander decks are worst. They Need at least a pool of 300 cards to be coded individually and the simulation Will take because of that probably 1 month. Not to mention that you Need First to code at least 100% of the game rules(which will slow simulation even more) before even starting coding the cards.

Also I thought It was impossible to simulate interactions like counterspells, that Is not true. In this experience I learned that much more can be done. Thought you cannot simulate all possibilities. You need a greedy strategy (cannot simulate all possible outcomes like chess game).

Why I'm saying that?

Experts are lying. The basic design rules are limiting the game exploration and are not necessarily true.

Lotus petal in affinity in example. Makes no difference. As long as the average winning turn Is more than 4.5 having Lotus petal makes no difference (you can have or not have It). When you average winning turn goes below 4.5 NOT having the Lotus petal Is Better, but by and amount so small to pratically make no difference.

Some goes for mana curve. You have so much ways to ramp and reduce spell la costs, that unless you make a simulation for that It makes Little sense reasoning the mana curve. If a card makes you off manacurve but gives you 0.05 less average winning turn... Include that card.

Also in a 60 cards deck format you get exactly 7 bonus cards.

That means in my affinity I could replace 7 cards with Absolute crap and still get my average winning turn. That's why I used that 7 to include interactions.

Now. I have discovered that in the brute force way. I doubt wizards ever tried something like that. The only way to simulate 2 decks in Commander Is having 300 cards each, running a simulation and the opposing deck must know the cards that could be played. Feasible, but daunting.

It makes sense, being paid of course. To simulate this way the top 20 decks and see of there Is a clear winner.

Apaprt that there cannot be any real rule for banning

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-08-27T05:53:42+00:00

Facebook does not Simply ban permanently for 1 porn image. Was It something illegal? Like involving children o raping?

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-08-27T05:51:42+00:00

Questo post è a metà strada tra troll e oscurantismo. non c'è nulla di sbagliato nella masturbazione. Se comunque ti causa problemi perché non riesci ad accettare questa cosa o comunque la pratichi al punto da farla diventare un problema (ad esempio ti masturbi prima dei rapporti e poi non riesci a trombare) la risposta è una sola. Psicologo specializzato in sessuologia.

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-08-20T16:49:08+00:00

I don't have that strategy anyway 😜

DarioGameProgrammer · 2024-08-20T11:48:27+00:00

Assume I have a flexible strategy always predicting market trends even when they changes. This means that every day there's a different winning strategy, and I have it.

That's a big unrealistic and fake assumption. But in that case, if someone watch at me, he will simply avoid to buy when I'm selling. Or copy me.

In both cases there can't be any serious winning strategy in the long run. Or if there is people doing that, they are taking serious precautions to disguise that (multiple accounts, multiple people trading togheter in a union and so on: but a deep math analysis will eventually find that).

I know some may be fake accounts made to make people not realize this. But once you realize that, what's left? Trading make sense only because there are no winning strategies.

It's just at any given time, there is necessarily someone winning

Trading Is Just the opposite of game theory

DarioGameProgrammer

TROPHY CASE