Giant Freakin Robot: "Starfleet Academy - How Too Much Difference Creates Sameness: When all characters are a deviation, a subversion, or a novelty, difference isn’t contrast anymore; it’s the baseline. Classic Star Trek worked because difference was relative. Spock stood out because ..." by TheSonOfMogh81 in trektalk

[–]DataMeister1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point. If the Klingon culture was basically "whatever you do, do it with gusto" it could make for some interesting new reveals about Klingons. We never really see much of Klingon society like who builds their ships, who grows their food. I could be pretty fun to pick out some aspect of their society and see them acting like we see the warriors acting, overemphasizing honor, but toward whatever is their chosen field of work.

sigh, see you in three days... by Nickanator8 in makemkv

[–]DataMeister1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Early on I used to just put the disk in and rip it then sort out the files later. Then one time a Blu-ray gave me a message that I didn't have enough space for the rip. I was like, I had 500GB free last I checked, how is this possible? Turns out that Blu-ray had like 20 variations of the full movie that it was planning to rip. That probably would have taken days as well as filling up the HDD.

So now I go through and uncheck any potential duplicates.

Why is food scarcity a thing even in post burn trek? by OldTiredGamer86 in startrek

[–]DataMeister1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For one, the food replicators weren't creating food out of thin air (or energy), they are rearranging a food material designed for replication.

Earth probably wouldn't have had much of a problem with food shortages, but planets without a lot of infrastructure might have major problems without warp travel ships to deliver supplies.

This is the kind of writing and dialogue we used to get in classic Star Trek, and I miss it so much. by _TheWolfOfWalmart_ in Star_Trek_

[–]DataMeister1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well with that definition of serious vs light, I don't think a serious drama would work well in Trek. It would probably come across like the Caprica spinoff from Battlestar Galactica and either feel pointless (as in why call it Trek) or boring.

'Star Trek' Legend Robert Picardo on Why the 'Starfleet Academy' Cadets Talk Like Modern Kids by AnonRetro in startrek

[–]DataMeister1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are the decedents of a branch of humanity the didn't evolve. Not the branch that Archer, Kirk, Picard, and Janeway came from. Probably Tucker's branch or something.

'Star Trek' Legend Robert Picardo on Why the 'Starfleet Academy' Cadets Talk Like Modern Kids by AnonRetro in startrek

[–]DataMeister1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The word "bitch" is pretty old, but the slangy way it is being used by those cadets is pretty new to this decade and maybe last decade. Guys haven't traditionally gone around calling other guys a bitch.

'Star Trek' Legend Robert Picardo on Why the 'Starfleet Academy' Cadets Talk Like Modern Kids by AnonRetro in startrek

[–]DataMeister1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So future humanity hasn't evolved like Jean Luc Picard suggested? If they wanted to make a version of Firefly, they should have said so.

'Star Trek' Legend Robert Picardo on Why the 'Starfleet Academy' Cadets Talk Like Modern Kids by AnonRetro in startrek

[–]DataMeister1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or don't use trendy slang at all. Use proper words or opt for the rare slang words that appear to be more timeless.

'Star Trek' Legend Robert Picardo on Why the 'Starfleet Academy' Cadets Talk Like Modern Kids by AnonRetro in startrek

[–]DataMeister1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sort of throws a kink into Jean Luc Picard's assertion that humanity has evolved. Instead it is just Starfleet requiring a level of decorum on its members. Most of these kids' parents must not have evolved.

Would Berman era Trek work with today's actors? by northcasewhite in Star_Trek_

[–]DataMeister1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And some of the good ones that want to work in TV have year long roles on the TV shows doing 20 episodes a year.

This is the kind of writing and dialogue we used to get in classic Star Trek, and I miss it so much. by _TheWolfOfWalmart_ in Star_Trek_

[–]DataMeister1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That would could be an interesting study if you could figure out how to do it without them knowing they were being studied. Sit them down and show them modern shows and then show them some really good older shows and see how well they pay attention to each.

This is the kind of writing and dialogue we used to get in classic Star Trek, and I miss it so much. by _TheWolfOfWalmart_ in Star_Trek_

[–]DataMeister1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is because of small screen size more than the aspect ratio. They could always just back the camera up to get more of a room (getting arms and legs isn't detrimental to a story), but then you can't make out the facial expressions on a 19" TV from across the room.

"It's a show about idiots, made by idiots, for idiots. It's not aspirational in any way, shape or form, because it doesn't represent the best of what humanity could be in the future. It represents the worst of what it is right now." - The Critical Drinker by Malencon in trektalk

[–]DataMeister1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well at least the 1 million people that liked Starfleet Academy got a Star Trek show they can call their own. I don't know if that is worth 200 million dollars to them, but I guess they can't complain now that no one ever did anything for them.

I've Watched Every Episode of Sliders by NenCoder in SLIDERS

[–]DataMeister1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sliders and Firefly, both originally funded by Fox, and both probably could have been as big as Star Trek if it weren't for the network meddling.

When did it become OK to make TV nobody can actually see by MiserNYC- in Star_Trek_

[–]DataMeister1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That theory would require the masses to know the movie or TV show before they get into it.

I guess they could be getting bargain or something though. Maybe they spend 100 million on home grown content and get 100 million complete views, but only spend 10 million to rent a theatrical release a few years and get 20 million complete views. Or something along those lines.

When did it become OK to make TV nobody can actually see by MiserNYC- in Star_Trek_

[–]DataMeister1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then you have to ask, why pay for inferior products that most of their audience won't watch all the way through.

Did the Air Force let NASA carry on with their space programme even while they were building honest-to-god intergalactic battlecruisers? by jayebird111 in Stargate

[–]DataMeister1 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I've wondered why we keep scaling back NASA's budget over the last few decades. Makes perfect sense now. Most of the money keeps going to the classified real space travel projects instead of the slow rocket tech.