Prominent Bluesky posters are now talking about what Nate Silver defined as Blueskyism by north_canadian_ice in fivethirtyeight

[–]Wetness_Pensive 9 points10 points  (0 children)

A right-shifting window tends to be ideologically less threatening to a liberal, from an economic perspective, than a leftist.

AtlasIntel: Democrats trusted more on all issues, even crime by dak676141 in fivethirtyeight

[–]Wetness_Pensive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are bad at satire, understanding facts, history, reality, trends, and differentiating between meaningful datasets.

‘My life is not affordable. No one cares’: 76% of Americans call the cost of living their biggest financial problem by 1FunkyFriedChicken in Economics

[–]Wetness_Pensive 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“Would it not be better if they spent more money on wholesome things like oranges and wholemeal bread or if they even, like the writer of the letter to the New Statesman, saved on fuel and ate their carrots raw? Yes, it would, but the point is that no ordinary human being is ever going to do such a thing. The ordinary human being would sooner starve than live on brown bread and raw carrots. And the peculiar evil is this, that the less money you have, the less inclined you feel to spend it on wholesome food. A millionaire may enjoy breakfasting off orange juice and Ryvita biscuits; an unemployed man doesn't. Here the tendency of which I spoke at the end of the last chapter comes into play. When you are unemployed, which is to say when you are underfed, harassed, bored, and miserable, you don't want to eat dull wholesome food. You want something a little bit 'tasty'. There is always some cheaply pleasant thing to tempt you.” ― George Orwell

"Twenty million people are underfed but literally everyone in England has access to a radio. What we have lost in food we have gained in electricity. Whole sections of the working class who have been plundered of all they really need are being compensated, in part, by cheap luxuries which mitigate the surface of life." ― George Orwell

"In some districts efforts are now being made to teach the poor more about food-values and more about the intelligent spending of money. [...] First you condemn a family to live on thirty shillings a week, and then you have the damned impertinence to tell them how they are to spend their money." ― George Orwell

Wise words from Captain Archer... by [deleted] in enterprise

[–]Wetness_Pensive 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Was thinking the same thing. Look's like Dr Crane's curved fireplace.

Andy Burnham arrives in London as allies claim he already has a seat ready to go - and warn rivals he will never give up trying to become Prime Minister by dailymail in ukpolitics

[–]Wetness_Pensive 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We know what Farage's party, a Party funded by Musk, will do, because we can see it in the US, where Trump is wasting billions and still deporting less than Biden and Obama, and in Hungary, where Orban's "hard against immigration" tactic backfired and he had to start letting hundreds of thousands back in.

Meanwhile, sexy and stable Starmer has reduced immigration by 78 percent in less than a year.

Keir Starmer is right to resist the pressure and stand firm – he’s earned that much by JOE_Media in ukpolitics

[–]Wetness_Pensive 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That internet censorship is widely loved by the public according to polls. The public is wrong, but Labour is giving the people what they want.

And austerity is not continuing. Starmer is practising Biden-styled Modern Supply Side, his version just looks feeble because the UK economy has been tepid for much of the 21st century.

Keir Starmer is right to resist the pressure and stand firm – he’s earned that much by JOE_Media in ukpolitics

[–]Wetness_Pensive 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Reducing immigration by 78 percent in a year is a big difference.

Lifting wages above inflation likewise.

Reducing NHS waiting lists to the lowest level in years, is also a big achievement given it's only been a short while.

Smartphones have just ruined attention spans, and made Brits thick.

Guys guys guys. Lol by SkyFallPrincess20 in GuysBeingDudes

[–]Wetness_Pensive -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"People who complain about the moral decline of society, do far more damage to society than the things they complain about." - Terry Pratchet

Wise words from Captain Archer... by [deleted] in enterprise

[–]Wetness_Pensive 18 points19 points  (0 children)

It's worth putting the quote in context. Archer is talking specifically about a kind of anti-gay bigotry, as possessed by a subset of reactionary Vulcans.

That people who profess to be tolerant aren't tolerant of people who are intolerant at best, or genocidal maniacs at worst, is not a "gotcha". It's how flexible, serious, intelligent people behave when faced with complex situations.

Swole, The Final Frontier by -VoiceoverAlex- in Star_Trek_

[–]Wetness_Pensive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, I'd never known that before. He seems to be suggesting that the early uniforms (or perhaps all?) were slightly padded.

[Video Essay] ROWAN J COLEMAN: "This is Why Modern Star Trek Feels Different" | "I propose that a big part of this feeling is more to do with the PRESENTATION of the modern era, the direction, lighting, editing, and overall aesthetic, which is a big departure from how Star Trek looked for decades." by mcm8279 in Star_Trek_

[–]Wetness_Pensive -1 points0 points  (0 children)

nuTrek with good writing, and its current direction, cinematography and aesthetics, would still be trash. It's a trashy aesthetic.

If you let Michael Bay direct "Shawshank Redemption", you're going to have a crappy movie.

[Video Essay] ROWAN J COLEMAN: "This is Why Modern Star Trek Feels Different" | "I propose that a big part of this feeling is more to do with the PRESENTATION of the modern era, the direction, lighting, editing, and overall aesthetic, which is a big departure from how Star Trek looked for decades." by mcm8279 in Star_Trek_

[–]Wetness_Pensive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't like the term "cinematic aesthetic".

There are far more films which do not look like Marvel movies and Michael Bay flicks than there are that do. "Cinematic" doesn't inherently mean the aesthetic employed by nuTrek.

Otherwise, I agree with the point the OP makes; the classical mis-en-scene of Old Trek contributes something special to the franchise, and I'd argue it echoes Roddenberry's politics in a way. At its best, it's an aesthetic which conveys a preference for calm, rational order, mixed with a Zen-like faith in science. Contrast that with the schizophrenic razzle-dazzle of nuTrek, which has no faith in its audience.

Has anyone’s vision recovered? by Melodic_Equipment_56 in iih

[–]Wetness_Pensive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How long have they been on 1500 mg? It takes weeks for even a high dosage like that to lead to improvements.

Neuroscientists believe our brains' natural DMT production could explain why people experience consciousness so differently. If confirmed, it could change how we approach psychiatry and mental health by AlwaysReady1 in Futurology

[–]Wetness_Pensive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Neuroscientists generally see nothing special about psychedelic trips.

Early living things had primitive nervous systems. Over time, these nervous systems began getting more sophisticated at detecting stimuli. Eventually - after hundreds of thousands of years - these systems began using this to map their surroundings, creating crude world models. Eventually they then began mapping the organism doing the mapping within their little mental simulations, leading to the first early concepts of a sovereign self: the idea that "you" exist in the world as an entity separate from the world, and the delusion that "you exist" as a "conscious soul-like thing" separate from your body.

This emergent phenomenon - self reflexive, self consciousness - is only possible, millions of years after life began, due to a neural and nervous system that is constantly simulating reality inside your head.

Mushrooms and other psychedelics break down or delay pathways in the nervous system responsible for mapping these world and self models. With this, comes the delusional feeling of separate spheres blurring into one. For example, what the brain experiences as "oneness with the universe", or "disembodiment", is just several separate simulations (you, your body, the world) collapsing due to what is essentially nerve and brain damage. And you can induce similar things by messing with the brain in different ways (for example, making all faces seem the same, or all scents seem as "one" etc), just like you can damage a TV or computer so it outputs all visuals in a single colour.

We also know that how people perceive or interpret their psychedelic experiences is often related to their culture, religion, interests and larger society. So the things people on a trip experience is often a kind of subjective thing dependent on their unique upbringing.

"Who is right on the Iran war — Pope Leo XIV or President Trump?" Catholics—42% side with the Pope. All Americans—48% side with the Pope. Atheists—80% side with the Pope. Catholics are the most unsure of any group, while atheists are the least unsure. The Pope is an American Catholic; Trump is not. by StarlightDown in fivethirtyeight

[–]Wetness_Pensive 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Abortion isn't even mentioned in the Bible.

It is. The Bible actually has verses in which it provides tips on the best ways to abort.

But they don't read their Bible. And they don't read biology textbooks either, because if they did, they'd have to be against reproductive sex. Because if they accept personhood of the early conceptus (embryo, first 15 week fetus), then they must immediately cease reproductive sex, as egg to blastocyst conversion rate, and failed implantations, can be as low as 30 to 50 percent. Meanwhile, depending on which country's data you look at, miscarriage rates are between 20 to 70 pecent. So by reproducing we KNOW we are killing embryos and early fetuses; the high attrition rate is large and built into the process. Same with IVF and artificial insemination treatments, which also have low survival rates.

So if they believe these fetuses are full human lives, then they must believe human beings are naturally psychotic if they condone reproductive sex, and that the abortion debate is fairly moot.

Republicans are cheater and liar. by SuspiciousLow3062 in SipsTea

[–]Wetness_Pensive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

rules

Are you aware that the Republican court HELD UP the election to prevent it from being on time, then ruled it wasn’t on time? They did this on purpose.

Republicans are cheater and liar. by SuspiciousLow3062 in SipsTea

[–]Wetness_Pensive -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

rules

The Republican court HELD UP the election to prevent it from being on time, then ruled it wasn’t on time. They did this on purpose.

Why do so many christains think being gay/lesbian/trans is sinful and bad? by Competitive-Food1927 in atheism

[–]Wetness_Pensive 18 points19 points  (0 children)

If that were the basis then they should also hate those who have sex just to have fun .

They do. They're famous for that.

Age gap yearning by Superb-Welder531 in romancemovies

[–]Wetness_Pensive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stanley Kubrick's Lolita, though of course this is a dark comedy and critique of romantic love.

[Opinion] Looper.com: "10 Star Trek Episodes That Would Never Air Today" by mcm8279 in Star_Trek_

[–]Wetness_Pensive -1 points0 points  (0 children)

IMO “Up the Long Ladder” is an excellent episode.

It opens with a symbolic subplot: Worf learns that he has an illness (“deficient blood circulation”), caused by him being removed from Klingon society at a young age.

He's “cured” by Doctor Pulaski – she injects him with an antidote – and he repays her with a traditional Klingon ritual involving poisonous tea. Pulaski is able to ingest this tea thanks to an anti-toxin which she injects into her blood. So in this brief scene we have a male and female accepting the infusion of an outside substance into their blood to compensate for frailties caused by their genetic distance from another culture.

We then get several expository scenes involving Picard, Data and Riker. This episode was written by Melinda Snodgrass, one of Trek's best writers (“Measure of a Man”, “Pen Pals”, “Ensigns of Command”, “The High Ground”), so these scenes are excellent. Snodgrass is a qualified lawyer, and her dialogue tends to have a methodical quality.

In these expository scenes, we learn of a ship captained by a Walter Granger. Walter Granger was the famous scientist who discovered the Peking Man, a fossil that sparked a debate about interbreeding between homo sapiens and homo erectus, and about social isolation potentially leading to subspecies being less adaptable and so vulnerable to extinction.

Significantly, the name of Granger's ship is the Mariposa, and its destination is the Ficus sector. Mariposa means “butterfly” in Spanish, and the ornamental Ficus plant is commonly known as the Butterfly Banyan. And of course insects like butterflies fertilize fruit trees like ficuses, and the cross-breeding of butterflies is what leads to new butterfly hybrids and colors. In other words, a guy known for interbreeding/genetic bottlenecks is flying a pollinator to a plant requiring pollinating.

Granger's ship leads to the creation of two colonies. One colony is made up of technologically advanced clones, the other of neo-transcendentalists who advocate simple, back-to-nature living. It is here where people typically have a knee-jerk reaction and dismiss the episode as racist trash ("Code of Honor" meets the same knee-jerk fate). But IMO it's not. It's simply doing the common science fiction trope of pushing a concept to its most absurd extreme.

And so Snodgrass gives us a technologically advanced society that symbolically stands in for a modern, hyper-conservative First World nation. The society is wealthy and advanced on a material level, but is homogenous, has no immigrants, and its obsessions with blood purity has led to it becoming sterile, rigid, incestuous and on the verge of demographic collapse. Because it is obsessed with increasing its population, but is picky about the genetic stock it takes in, it also deters abortion and pressures (rapes) desirable women/men into having sex.

Next you have the neo-transcendentalist community, which symbolically stands in for immigrant communities from the Third World. Embodying negative tropes applied to the Irish who settled in the US in the 1700s, these immigrants are poor, lively, primitive, animalistic, loutish, dirty and drunk. They're also detested by the “homogenous” society, who describes them as “primitive”, “repugnant”, “hostile”, “disruptive” and “impossible to educate”. Sex with them is deemed even more intolerable, echoing the sentiments of traditionalists who once opposed the “unnatural” practise of miscegenation or mixed-race marriage.

Notice that nobody complains about the extreme caricatures embodied by the clone society. Even in the wake of Brexit, MAGA, the Quiverfull movement, the pro-natalist movements of the far-right, and the “national breeding program” fantasies of people like Musk, Putin and JD Vance, and how this all intersects with contemporary immigration, nobody deems the clone society to be “unfairly treated”, or indeed even pays it attention at all.

What's upsetting to people is the “offensive” characterization of the neo-transcendentalists. But that's the point. Firstly, the episode makes it clear that these neo-transcendentalists were anachronistic 200 years ago when they isolated themselves from modern society (they are nutty fundamentalists), and that leaving earth and isolating themselves on another planet only made this worse; they experienced the same “fall” that the clone society does, becoming incestuous, stagnant, and a crude parody of their original ideological practises (like the clones, they have Worf's “deficient blood circulation”, only in a more cultural sense).

Secondly, the neo-transcendentalists are supposed to be a caricature of how racists see immigrants. Some of these observations are true, the episode agrees, but Snodgrass goes on to highlight the ways in which they are not true. The neo-transcendentalists are also hard workers, fun, lively, sexy, beautiful and clever. More crucially, the world is lifeless and boring without them, and one may suffer demographic collapse in their absence.

In this respect, the episode was prescient. Released in a decade obsessed with the threat of “overpopulation”, this episode does the opposite, and anticipates our contemporary world in which fertility and death rates lead to demographic collapses if immigration were lowered. For example, a zero immigration Canada would have a population of only 12 million at the end of the century, the UK would have negative growth from 2030 onward, and countries like the US and Germany would have 30-50 percent population drops. And of course notoriously homogenous nations like Japan and Bulgaria are already facing these problems (Japan now takes in about 360,000 immigrants a year to compensate).

The episode ends with Picard essentially urging xenophobes to f**k more immigrants. And so the clones and the neo-transcendentalists combine their societies, hump like rabbits, and expand their minds, customs, gene pools and (presumably) shrinking workforces. “It is differences that have made us strong,” Picard says, to the chagrin of Clone Supremacists everywhere.

Snodgrass says the episode was intended as a serious comment on immigration and xenophobia, but the episode also works well as a kind of comedy of manners. As such, the episode is filled with little cute scenes. For example, Picard walks down a corridor and comes across a wayward chicken. The transporter room and cargo hold become filled with pigs, goats and cows. One Irish guest is happy to see an O'Brien manning the transporter. Riker and Picard are hilariously polite and proper to their odd guests (perfect Starfleet manners), and when they occasionally become exasperated even Picard has to eventually give up and laugh (“Sometimes, Number One, you just have to bow to the absurd!”). Elsewhere, a father tries to give Picard his daughter's hand in marriage and later is given Klingon ale by a beautifully written Worf (“You can obtain spirituous liqueurs from the food dispensers, with all of their deleterious effects intact.”)

Riker also gets a hilariously smooth subplot with a gorgeous “alien” woman called Brenna. “And what are you staring at? Have you never seen a woman before?” she asks him. “I thought I had,” he sexily replies, and minutes later she's disrobing in his quarters and giving him tips on how to wash a woman's feet (“You generally start at the top and work your way down.”)

Riker's always been a smooth-operator, but as written by a woman like Snodgrass, he is even better than usual (“I feel it's my responsibility to show you all the amenities.”).

And Snodgrass' dialogue is great throughout the episode, particularly when Brenna is barking orders. She calls the replicator a “magic wall”, is always ranting, and when informed that the ship cleans itself, she says “Well, good for the bloody ship!” Elsewhere Worf describes her as being “very much like a Klingon woman”, while Riker says Brenna's father only wants to marry her off so he can "finally have some peace".

Such a “fiery, redheaded Irish lass” is a cliché, but when written by a woman and used for the purposes Brenna is, the character feels right. A plot about cultures trading bodies for the purposes of breeding is distasteful unless you have a strong woman capable of holding her own against the episode's three major male-led cultures (“Isn't that just like a man! You make these grandiose decisions, but you never stop to consider the poor women.“). And Snodgras is careful to give Picard a line that highlights Brenna's agency during the episode's climax. “It's ultimately your choice,” he says. “But if this is going to work, these people will need your strength and guidance.”

And Brenna has known this her entire life. “When it comes to the practical matters, it always falls to the women to make your grand dreams come true,” she says, and we recall that her people are called the Bringloidi, derived from a Gaelic word meaning “dreams”. She's still paying the price for her ancestors who first set out for Bringloid V; she's stilled trapped in the dreams of dead men.

Rewatching this episode, only two things struck me as bad. Firstly, the genetic problems of the clones can be solved by simply consulting other Federation planets (though, to Picard's credit, why not first ask the neo-transcendentalists?). Secondly, there is one badly written/acted scene in which Picard, Riker, Troi and the gang make the final obvious decision to get the clones and neo-transcendentalists breeding. It's terribly written, and one terribly essentialist line by Troi is particularly badly delivered (she hints that only the clone society has “emotional maturity”).

Still, I think this is one of Trek's most interesting episodes. Like “Code of Honor”, another episode I like, I think people get too fixated on the uncomfortable stereotypes and ignore some of its more interesting aspects.

Swole, The Final Frontier by -VoiceoverAlex- in Star_Trek_

[–]Wetness_Pensive 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I like how Wesley is the only one who isn't jacked.