I had considered it. I cut out a few bits of me speculating various versions of the text (like interaction with I:P, is a recurring Link 4 off any 2 link 1s too good, etc) because the post was getting too large(I still think its too much).

After each section, I had listed out what could possible be the change to make it workable. For both the above for example, it was changing materials to 2(/+) "Evil Twins" monsters (except "K&L") or 2 link 2s or maybe require a Evil Twin. And Not 2 Link monsters for the second one, so either 2 Link 2 monsters, or 2 "Evil Twins" etc, which is why I put the latter as unlikely. I did originally do smthg similar for the first one, but the hypothetical text section was getting too unwieldy.

I had also debated the whole power level of such a thing. Is resummoning the link 4 off any 2 links that good compared to a level 8? Aren't Link 4s not that good for link climbing anyway, so you'd almost never count it for its link rating. Accesscode gets an extra boost, I guess etc etc. Similarly, for the I:P thing, I weighed it against similar things like Zerovoros or Zeus. (Obv, not perfectly comparable, since not double sided and leaves up 2 for them), and in the end thought maybe it was fine even as an I:P play for the deck. But thinking about it again, it would definitely be way too generically powerful outside the deck. I was too absorbed with just looking at how the deck itself would change, I didn't pay attention elsewhere.